Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.

A /proc/credits maybe? Vipin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Linux NET4.0 for Linux 2.4 > > > Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039 > > > > The later line is not something of interest to most people, and if it > > happens to be they can research it rather than being

Re: Missing cache flush.

Bjorn Wesen wrote: > > I'd agree that to be really certain, a "flush_dcache()" function > should be implemented and used when an erase finishes. Like David Miller > wrote somewhere in the thread, one way is to use your knowledge of the > arch's cache and do suitable dummy accesses to flush it,

Re: Missing cache flush.

Bjorn Wesen wrote: I'd agree that to be really certain, a flush_dcache() function should be implemented and used when an erase finishes. Like David Miller wrote somewhere in the thread, one way is to use your knowledge of the arch's cache and do suitable dummy accesses to flush it, if there