On 2007.06.23 11:50:49 +, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:42:21 -0400 Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I probably _could_ work this out, and kinda did with a bit of
> > list-trolling
> > > (verdict: needed in 2.6.22) but please, take care to describe the
> > >
On 2007.06.23 11:50:49 +, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 14:42:21 -0400 Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I probably _could_ work this out, and kinda did with a bit of
list-trolling
(verdict: needed in 2.6.22) but please, take care to describe the
importance of a
On 2007.06.21 18:10:50 +, Carlo Wood wrote:
>
> I am glad to see that you found a real reason for why it might have
> gone wrong. Just not initializing because it's not needed, but not
> understanding WHY it went wrong would have been rather unsatisfactory.
>
yes, I understand, but it looks
On 2007.06.21 18:10:50 +, Carlo Wood wrote:
I am glad to see that you found a real reason for why it might have
gone wrong. Just not initializing because it's not needed, but not
understanding WHY it went wrong would have been rather unsatisfactory.
yes, I understand, but it looks we
. This
may cause problem.
So mark them as NULL in the table, we won't load if no IGD got detect
and bridge has no AGP port.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c | 35 +++
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 del
On 2007.06.20 16:02:37 +, Carlo Wood wrote:
>
> and I am not sure if you will consider the:
>
> agpgart: Failed to find bridge device (chip_id: 29a2)
>
> a bug.
yeah, the error message needs to be fixed only if AGP cap
exists. I was checking with other GMCH data sheets, we'd better
On 2007.06.20 16:02:37 +, Carlo Wood wrote:
and I am not sure if you will consider the:
agpgart: Failed to find bridge device (chip_id: 29a2)
a bug.
yeah, the error message needs to be fixed only if AGP cap
exists. I was checking with other GMCH data sheets, we'd better
disable AGP
. This
may cause problem.
So mark them as NULL in the table, we won't load if no IGD got detect
and bridge has no AGP port.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c | 35 +++
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 16 deletions
On 2007.06.20 09:15:21 +, Wang Zhenyu wrote:
>
> I think for i965 we could have following patch to fix this, we may
> fail if no IGD device got detected.
>
oops, missing 946G, what a name...
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char
imilar issue also happen
like https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228683
I think for i965 we could have following patch to fix this, we may
fail if no IGD device got detected.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c b/drivers/ch
://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228683
I think for i965 we could have following patch to fix this, we may
fail if no IGD device got detected.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
index 0439ee9..5a54a9c 100644
On 2007.06.20 09:15:21 +, Wang Zhenyu wrote:
I think for i965 we could have following patch to fix this, we may
fail if no IGD device got detected.
oops, missing 946G, what a name...
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c b/drivers
On 2007.06.18 03:56:36 +, Carlo Wood wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:57:38AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > >Right now, I'm at a loss to explain the corruption, so it's
> > >difficult to suggest what to try.
> >
> > The thing is here, this is PCIE, so if there is a GPU plugged into the
> >
On 2007.06.18 03:56:36 +, Carlo Wood wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:57:38AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
Right now, I'm at a loss to explain the corruption, so it's
difficult to suggest what to try.
The thing is here, this is PCIE, so if there is a GPU plugged into the
PCIE 16x
On 2007.06.14 09:34:12 +, Wang Zhenyu wrote:
>
> Dave, after rethinking about this, I think we mixed two cases
> need to be fixed here. This is the patch for this, sorry for mess
> it up. Meelis, could you help to test by replace my last patch with this?
>
oop, for 945GM
ts, like an add-in card is plugged. Second on some type of intel
GMCH, it might have multiple graphic chip models, like 945GME case, so
we should be sure the detect works through the whole table.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/char/a
On 2007.06.13 12:15:13 +, Dave Jones wrote:
> > [AGPGART] intel_agp: use table for device probe
> >
> Oh, we have this check in find_gmch ..
>
> if (gmch_device && PCI_FUNC(gmch_device->devfn) != 0) {
> ^
>
>
On 2007.06.13 12:15:13 +, Dave Jones wrote:
[AGPGART] intel_agp: use table for device probe
Oh, we have this check in find_gmch ..
if (gmch_device PCI_FUNC(gmch_device-devfn) != 0) {
^
Which isn't going
is plugged. Second on some type of intel
GMCH, it might have multiple graphic chip models, like 945GME case, so
we should be sure the detect works through the whole table.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c | 97
On 2007.06.14 09:34:12 +, Wang Zhenyu wrote:
Dave, after rethinking about this, I think we mixed two cases
need to be fixed here. This is the patch for this, sorry for mess
it up. Meelis, could you help to test by replace my last patch with this?
oop, for 945GME like case, we should
On 2007.06.11 22:23:21 +, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> I'd feel much safer if we only did this on chipsets where we know we
> have to do it. Doing this for *every* Intel chipset ever made _will_
> bite us. There are some early chipsets (440BX era iirc) that would just
> hang the box when you
on agpgart.git
tip.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davej/agpgart.git;a=summary
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c | 44 +-
1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp
on agpgart.git
tip.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davej/agpgart.git;a=summary
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c | 44 +-
1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel
On 2007.06.11 22:23:21 +, Dave Jones wrote:
I'd feel much safer if we only did this on chipsets where we know we
have to do it. Doing this for *every* Intel chipset ever made _will_
bite us. There are some early chipsets (440BX era iirc) that would just
hang the box when you tried to
On 2007.06.06 09:01:57 +, Wang Zhenyu wrote:
>
> This patch adds pci ids for G33, Q33 and Q35 chips
>
> It bases on below intel-agp patches currently in -mm tree:
> intel_agp-cleanup-intel-private-data.patch
> intel_agp-cleanup-intel-private-data-update.patch
> intel_agp
intel_agp-use-table-for-device-probe.patch
intel_agp-use-table-for-device-probe-update.patch
intel_agp-add-support-for-965gme-gle.patch
intel_agp-add-support-for-945gme.patch
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/char/agp/agp.h |6 +++-
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
intel_agp-use-table-for-device-probe.patch
intel_agp-use-table-for-device-probe-update.patch
intel_agp-add-support-for-965gme-gle.patch
intel_agp-add-support-for-945gme.patch
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/char/agp/agp.h |6 +++-
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c | 78
On 2007.06.06 09:01:57 +, Wang Zhenyu wrote:
This patch adds pci ids for G33, Q33 and Q35 chips
It bases on below intel-agp patches currently in -mm tree:
intel_agp-cleanup-intel-private-data.patch
intel_agp-cleanup-intel-private-data-update.patch
intel_agp-use-table-for-device
[AGPGART] intel_agp: add support for 945GME
Add pci id info for 945GME.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
Dave,
Here's the patch to add pci ids for 965GME/GLE chip. It is
based on latest git and with these two applied.
+ intel_agp-cleanup-intel-private-data.patch
+ intel_agp-use-table-for-device-probe.patch
Add pci id info for 965GME/GLE support.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTEC
Dave,
Here's the patch to add pci ids for 965GME/GLE chip. It is
based on latest git and with these two applied.
+ intel_agp-cleanup-intel-private-data.patch
+ intel_agp-use-table-for-device-probe.patch
Add pci id info for 965GME/GLE support.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED
[AGPGART] intel_agp: add support for 945GME
Add pci id info for 945GME.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
index
.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c | 300 ++
1 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 202 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
index e12f579..dcb6d4f 100644
--- a/d
Remove volatile type declare for IO mem variables.
A single private gart data is used by all drivers, this
makes it clean. Eric Anholt wrote the original patch.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c | 195 ---
On 2007.05.29 10:18:48 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:21:25PM +0800, Wang Zhenyu wrote:
> > +static const struct intel_driver_description {
> > + unsigned int chip_id;
> > + unsigned int gmch_chip_id;
> > + char *name;
> > +
[PATCH 2/2] [AGPGART] intel_agp: use table for device probe
Remove big switch to make things clear. Eric Anholt
was the original author.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c | 324 --
1 files change
[AGPGART] intel_agp: cleanup intel private data
A single private gart data is used by all drivers, this
makes it clean. Eric Anholt wrote the original patch.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c | 193 ---
[AGPGART] intel_agp: cleanup intel private data
A single private gart data is used by all drivers, this
makes it clean. Eric Anholt wrote the original patch.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c | 193 --
1 files
[PATCH 2/2] [AGPGART] intel_agp: use table for device probe
Remove big switch to make things clear. Eric Anholt
was the original author.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c | 324 --
1 files changed, 122
On 2007.05.29 10:18:48 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 02:21:25PM +0800, Wang Zhenyu wrote:
+static const struct intel_driver_description {
+ unsigned int chip_id;
+ unsigned int gmch_chip_id;
+ char *name;
+ struct agp_bridge_driver *driver;
+ struct
Remove volatile type declare for IO mem variables.
A single private gart data is used by all drivers, this
makes it clean. Eric Anholt wrote the original patch.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c | 195 --
1
.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c | 300 ++
1 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 202 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
index e12f579..dcb6d4f 100644
--- a/drivers
On 2007.04.10 11:12:17 +, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:55:57PM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
> > > > Most GFX drivers don't call standard PCI DMA APIs to allocate DMA
> > > > buffer,
> > > > Such drivers will be broken with IOMMU enabled. To workaround this
> > > > issue,
>
On 2007.04.10 11:12:17 +, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 02:55:57PM -0700, Ashok Raj wrote:
Most GFX drivers don't call standard PCI DMA APIs to allocate DMA
buffer,
Such drivers will be broken with IOMMU enabled. To workaround this
issue,
we added two
Dave,
On G965, I810_PGETBL_CTL is a mmio offset, but we wrongly take it
as pci config space offset in detecting GTT size. This one line patch
fixs this.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
index a
Dave,
On G965, I810_PGETBL_CTL is a mmio offset, but we wrongly take it
as pci config space offset in detecting GTT size. This one line patch
fixs this.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
index a9fdbf9
[AGPGART] intel: Add 965GM chipset support
Update PCI id info for Intel 965GM chipset.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
index e542a62..a9fdbf9 100644
--- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
+++ b/driver
[AGPGART] intel: Add 965GM chipset support
Update PCI id info for Intel 965GM chipset.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
index e542a62..a9fdbf9 100644
--- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
+++ b/drivers/char
On 2007.01.29 22:30:53 +, Andreas Mohr wrote:
> > I've post a patch which trys to resolve pci config restore issue, see
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/16/297. It resolves s3 issue with my 965G
> > machine,
> > that my X can come back to live after s3, but I wasn't aware of the issues
> >
On 2007.01.29 22:30:53 +, Andreas Mohr wrote:
I've post a patch which trys to resolve pci config restore issue, see
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/1/16/297. It resolves s3 issue with my 965G
machine,
that my X can come back to live after s3, but I wasn't aware of the issues
Andreas
On 2007.01.18 23:16:51 +, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > Especially the PCI video_state trick finally got me a working resume on
> > > > 2.6.19-ck2 r128 Rage Mobility M4 AGP *WITH*(!) fully enabled and working
> > > > (and keeping working!) DRI (3D).
> > >
> > > Can we get whitelist
On 2007.01.18 23:16:51 +, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Especially the PCI video_state trick finally got me a working resume on
2.6.19-ck2 r128 Rage Mobility M4 AGP *WITH*(!) fully enabled and working
(and keeping working!) DRI (3D).
Can we get whitelist entry for
against 2.6.20-rc5.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
index ab0a9c0..7af734b 100644
--- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
+++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
@@ -1955,6 +1955,15 @@ static int agp_intel_
against 2.6.20-rc5.
Signed-off-by: Wang Zhenyu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
index ab0a9c0..7af734b 100644
--- a/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
+++ b/drivers/char/agp/intel-agp.c
@@ -1955,6 +1955,15 @@ static int agp_intel_resume(struct
On 2005.08.01 13:03:34 +, Roger Heflin wrote:
>
> On the newer Intels I have not found any useable ECC support
> is there any in the kernels?
For ia32, not in kernel now, see http://bluesmoke.sf.net
For ia64, kernel already have support.
>
> I can test a variety of hardware if someone
On 2005.08.01 13:03:34 +, Roger Heflin wrote:
On the newer Intels I have not found any useable ECC support
is there any in the kernels?
For ia32, not in kernel now, see http://bluesmoke.sf.net
For ia64, kernel already have support.
I can test a variety of hardware if someone needs
56 matches
Mail list logo
