hello

2014-05-08 Thread Johan Wiktor
you have won $300,000.00 contact aluy...@yahoo.com for winning claims call our customer service on this number:+44 702-409-9031 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

hello

2014-05-08 Thread Johan Wiktor
you have won $300,000.00 contact aluy...@yahoo.com for winning claims call our customer service on this number:+44 702-409-9031 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

Kernel 2.6.20+ and rt2500/rt2570 problem

2007-04-21 Thread Wiktor Wandachowicz
of the driver into mainline kernel, so users won't have to be forced to do a hardware upgrade. Additionally, this problem prevents my machines from being upgraded from Ubuntu 6.10 (kernel 2.6.17) to Ubuntu 7.04 (kernel 2.6.20 I believe). With kind regards, Wiktor Wandachowicz [1] http://rt2x00

Kernel 2.6.20+ and rt2500/rt2570 problem

2007-04-21 Thread Wiktor Wandachowicz
of the driver into mainline kernel, so users won't have to be forced to do a hardware upgrade. Additionally, this problem prevents my machines from being upgraded from Ubuntu 6.10 (kernel 2.6.17) to Ubuntu 7.04 (kernel 2.6.20 I believe). With kind regards, Wiktor Wandachowicz [1] http://rt2x00

Re: crypting filesystems

2005-04-04 Thread Wiktor
Hi, I'm using the following method and it seems to be working fine (involving crypto-loop): i have normal ext3 /boot partition, where i store kernel image & initrd. after lilo boots the kernel, initrd sets up /dev/loop0 to be crypto-loop/blowfish for /dev/hda1 (losetup /dev/loop0 /dev/hda1 -e

Re: crypting filesystems

2005-04-04 Thread Wiktor
Hi, I'm using the following method and it seems to be working fine (involving crypto-loop): i have normal ext3 /boot partition, where i store kernel image initrd. after lilo boots the kernel, initrd sets up /dev/loop0 to be crypto-loop/blowfish for /dev/hda1 (losetup /dev/loop0 /dev/hda1 -e

Re: [RFD] 'nice' attribute for executable files

2005-04-01 Thread Wiktor
Horst von Brand wrote: Even better: Write a C wrapper for each affected program that just renices it as needed. I suggest to implement scalable solution, so the final user wont't have to write separate wrapper for *each* program. universal wrapper is better solution, but (now i know, that

Re: [RFD] 'nice' attribute for executable files

2005-04-01 Thread Wiktor
Måns Rullgård wrote: So you are proposing the addition of a per-file attribute, with restricted access, and potentially dangerous effects if set incorrectly. This, combined with the fact that is unlikely to receive much testing, all speaks against it. Almost every attribute can be dangerous if

Re: [RFD] 'nice' attribute for executable files

2005-04-01 Thread Wiktor
Måns Rullgård wrote: So you are proposing the addition of a per-file attribute, with restricted access, and potentially dangerous effects if set incorrectly. This, combined with the fact that is unlikely to receive much testing, all speaks against it. Almost every attribute can be dangerous if

Re: [RFD] 'nice' attribute for executable files

2005-04-01 Thread Wiktor
Horst von Brand wrote: Even better: Write a C wrapper for each affected program that just renices it as needed. I suggest to implement scalable solution, so the final user wont't have to write separate wrapper for *each* program. universal wrapper is better solution, but (now i know, that

Re: [RFD] 'nice' attribute for executable files

2005-03-30 Thread Wiktor
Måns Rullgård wrote: You could wrap /lib/ld-linux.so, and get all dynamically linked programs done in one sweep. That's mad idea - keep similar things in one place! starting programs is done in kernel and nice-value-support is also done in kernel!! Using a shell to run external programs is quite

Re: [RFD] 'nice' attribute for executable files

2005-03-30 Thread Wiktor
Måns Rullgård wrote: It can be done entirely in userspace, if you want it. Just hack your shell to examine some extended attribute of your choice, and adjust the nice value before executing files. Then arrange to have the shell run with a negative nice value. This can be easily accomplished

Re: [RFD] 'nice' attribute for executable files

2005-03-30 Thread Wiktor
Bodo Eggert wrote: Wiktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: so i thought that it would be nice to add an attribute to file (changable only for root) that would modify nice value of process when it starts. if there is one byte free in ext2/3 file metadata, maybe it could be used for that? i

Re: [RFD] 'nice' attribute for executable files

2005-03-30 Thread Wiktor
Bodo Eggert wrote: Wiktor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so i thought that it would be nice to add an attribute to file (changable only for root) that would modify nice value of process when it starts. if there is one byte free in ext2/3 file metadata, maybe it could be used for that? i think

Re: [RFD] 'nice' attribute for executable files

2005-03-30 Thread Wiktor
Måns Rullgård wrote: It can be done entirely in userspace, if you want it. Just hack your shell to examine some extended attribute of your choice, and adjust the nice value before executing files. Then arrange to have the shell run with a negative nice value. This can be easily accomplished

Re: [RFD] 'nice' attribute for executable files

2005-03-30 Thread Wiktor
Måns Rullgård wrote: You could wrap /lib/ld-linux.so, and get all dynamically linked programs done in one sweep. That's mad idea - keep similar things in one place! starting programs is done in kernel and nice-value-support is also done in kernel!! Using a shell to run external programs is quite

[RFD] 'nice' attribute for executable files

2005-03-29 Thread Wiktor
Hi all, recently i had to run some program (xmms) with lowered nice value as normal user. to do that i had to su to the root account and then execute nice --5 xmms. but, then xmms was run as root and X server refused connection, so i had to do second su from root account. (total: su nice --5

Re: Building server-farm

2005-03-15 Thread Wiktor
, where i could set up everything sane. but now i need only links to some solutions, so i can test them. thanks for your help -- May the Source be with you Wiktor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More

Re: Building server-farm

2005-03-15 Thread Wiktor
, where i could set up everything sane. but now i need only links to some solutions, so i can test them. thanks for your help -- May the Source be with you Wiktor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info

Building server-farm

2005-03-14 Thread Wiktor
and network interface). Thanks for replies. -- May the Source be with you Wiktor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FA

Building server-farm

2005-03-14 Thread Wiktor
and network interface). Thanks for replies. -- May the Source be with you Wiktor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-29 Thread Wiktor
Do you still need atkbd.reset=1? No, i don't. i've just tried it, because when keyboard was not working, the only error report was produced by this option. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-29 Thread Wiktor
Wiktor, can you try atkbd.dumbkbd=1? Here you are full dmesg (see attachment). i've been typing alphabet after kernel boot. atkbd.dumpkbd.gz Description: application/gzip

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-29 Thread Wiktor
It still looks OK. It seems to be a very ancient keyboard. Can you try with a newer one? That'd tell us whether it's the controller or the keyboard that is giving problems. What keyboard model is it? What machine? Machine info attached as a part of /dev/proc. i've tried with another AT keyboard

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-29 Thread Wiktor
It still looks OK. It seems to be a very ancient keyboard. Can you try with a newer one? That'd tell us whether it's the controller or the keyboard that is giving problems. What keyboard model is it? What machine? Machine info attached as a part of /dev/proc. i've tried with another AT keyboard

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-29 Thread Wiktor
Wiktor, can you try atkbd.dumbkbd=1? Here you are full dmesg (see attachment). i've been typing alphabet after kernel boot. atkbd.dumpkbd.gz Description: application/gzip

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-29 Thread Wiktor
Do you still need atkbd.reset=1? No, i don't. i've just tried it, because when keyboard was not working, the only error report was produced by this option. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-28 Thread Wiktor
Hi, We do test AUX port and your port appears to be perfectly functional from the kernel point of view - it porperly responds to AUX_LOOP commands, does not claim to support MUX mode and KBC properly sets status register when asked to disable interface... ok, but how AUX block KBD port? if

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-28 Thread Wiktor
Hi, Could you please try editing drivers/input/serio/i8042.c and add udelay(20) before and after calls to i8042_write_data() in i8042_kbd_write() and i8042_command(). of course i could, will it make kernel not detect smoked AUX port? (problem is solved by i8042.noaux=1 cause my hardware has

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-28 Thread Wiktor
Hi, IT WORKED! Please try i8042.noaux=1. You say you're using a serial mouse in your other e-mail, so the system may not have an AUX port yet the kernel thinks it does. This may cause the keyboard to stop responding. command line "linux-new init=/bin/bash i8042.noaux=1 atkbd.reset=1" booted

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-28 Thread Wiktor
Hi, This dmesg looks like the keyboard works perfectly OK. Do new lines appear in dmesg when you press keys while the system is running? .no? no, they don't. i've new dmesg for you - it reports timeouts while trying to perform keyboard reset (by atkbd.reset=1). after detection

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-28 Thread Wiktor
Hi, This dmesg looks like the keyboard works perfectly OK. Do new lines appear in dmesg when you press keys while the system is running? .no? no, they don't. i've new dmesg for you - it reports timeouts while trying to perform keyboard reset (by atkbd.reset=1). after detection

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-28 Thread Wiktor
Hi, IT WORKED! Please try i8042.noaux=1. You say you're using a serial mouse in your other e-mail, so the system may not have an AUX port yet the kernel thinks it does. This may cause the keyboard to stop responding. command line linux-new init=/bin/bash i8042.noaux=1 atkbd.reset=1 booted 2.6.8.1

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-28 Thread Wiktor
Hi, Could you please try editing drivers/input/serio/i8042.c and add udelay(20) before and after calls to i8042_write_data() in i8042_kbd_write() and i8042_command(). of course i could, will it make kernel not detect smoked AUX port? (problem is solved by i8042.noaux=1 cause my hardware has

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-28 Thread Wiktor
Hi, We do test AUX port and your port appears to be perfectly functional from the kernel point of view - it porperly responds to AUX_LOOP commands, does not claim to support MUX mode and KBC properly sets status register when asked to disable interface... ok, but how AUX block KBD port? if

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-25 Thread Wiktor
Hi, here you are gzip-ed dmesg from booting 2.6.8.1 - i've been playing keyboard while booting, maybe interrupt reports will help you. also my .config part follows: CONFIG_INPUT=y CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=y CONFIG_SOUND_GAMEPORT=y CONFIG_SERIO=y CONFIG_SERIO_I8042=y CONFIG_INPUT_KEYBOARD=y

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-25 Thread Wiktor
Hi, here you are gzip-ed dmesg from booting 2.6.8.1 - i've been playing keyboard while booting, maybe interrupt reports will help you. also my .config part follows: CONFIG_INPUT=y CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=y CONFIG_SOUND_GAMEPORT=y CONFIG_SERIO=y CONFIG_SERIO_I8042=y CONFIG_INPUT_KEYBOARD=y

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-21 Thread Wiktor
Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi, What kernel version are you using? Have you tried 2.6.8.1? - it looks like changes in 2.6.9-rc2-bk3 caused problems on some hardware. Hi, it looks like 2.6.10 (which I was using) - serio ports are detected ok (both on 0x60,0x64, keyboard irq 1, aux irq 12), keyboard

AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-21 Thread Wiktor
to tell him (eg. atkbd.reset preforms keyboard reset but reports error). Were any hadrware-handling changes made since 2.4? If so, how to undo them and make keyboard alive? I'm grateful for any help. --- May the Source be with you. Wiktor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-21 Thread Wiktor
to tell him (eg. atkbd.reset preforms keyboard reset but reports error). Were any hadrware-handling changes made since 2.4? If so, how to undo them and make keyboard alive? I'm grateful for any help. --- May the Source be with you. Wiktor - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: AT keyboard dead on 2.6

2005-01-21 Thread Wiktor
Dmitry Torokhov wrote: Hi, What kernel version are you using? Have you tried 2.6.8.1? - it looks like changes in 2.6.9-rc2-bk3 caused problems on some hardware. Hi, it looks like 2.6.10 (which I was using) - serio ports are detected ok (both on 0x60,0x64, keyboard irq 1, aux irq 12), keyboard

2.6.10 - dead keyboard

2005-01-16 Thread Wiktor
Hi, my AT keyboard is dead on 2.6.10. .config was produced by "make defconfig" (procesor changed to i586) - attached as gz. System works ok, all programs run but keyboard is like unplugged (but it is plugged of course). Here is kernel bootup: Jan 15 20:11:02 wiktor kernel: Linux vers

2.6.10 - dead keyboard

2005-01-16 Thread Wiktor
Hi, my AT keyboard is dead on 2.6.10. .config was produced by make defconfig (procesor changed to i586) - attached as gz. System works ok, all programs run but keyboard is like unplugged (but it is plugged of course). Here is kernel bootup: Jan 15 20:11:02 wiktor kernel: Linux version 2.6.10