Burning multiple CD/DVDs at one time is slow (3.4.55 x86_64)

2013-10-10 Thread William Thompson
Please keep me in the CC. I tried burning 2 DVDs at the same time. Both processes completed however there were buffer underruns and the speed was no more than 4x. Each burner individually can do upto 16x and I have seen the burn end at 16-17x. The parallel burns ended no higher than 6x. Why is

Re: Error in syslog on 2.6.20

2007-07-03 Thread William Thompson
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 04:26:31PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > William Thompson wrote: > > I'm not on either list, keep me in CC. > > > > I noticed the following error on a cdrom device: > > ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen > > a

Error in syslog on 2.6.20

2007-06-22 Thread William Thompson
I'm not on either list, keep me in CC. I noticed the following error on a cdrom device: ata2.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen ata2.00: cmd a0/00:00:00:00:20/00:00:00:00:00/a0 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 0 res 40/00:03:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/a0 Emask 0x4 (timeout) ata2:

Re: [PATCH] libata: fallback to the other IDENTIFY on device error

2007-05-07 Thread William Thompson
t shouldn't cause too much problem. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: William Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > Willam, please verify this fixes your problem. Jeff, after all, we > seem to need this. :-( Even though you have a diffe

Re: [PATCH] libata: fallback to the other IDENTIFY on device error

2007-05-07 Thread William Thompson
t shouldn't cause too much problem. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: William Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > Willam, please verify this fixes your problem. Jeff, after all, we > seem to need this. :-( Seems that I have a different vers

Re: 2.6.20 libata cdrom

2007-05-01 Thread William Thompson
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 03:40:36PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > >> Tejun, don't we have a fallback for when IDENTIFY fails? > >> If the drive rejects it (err=0x04), then this can mean only one thing: > >> unsupported command, so we next must try PACKET_IDENTIFY. > > Up until now, we've been depending

Re: 2.6.20 libata cdrom

2007-05-01 Thread William Thompson
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:04:46AM -0400, Mark Lord wrote: > William Thompson wrote: > > > >+scsi2 : ata_piix > >+ata_port_schedule_eh: port EH scheduled > >+ata_scsi_error: ENTER > >+ata_port_flush_task: ENTER > >+ata_port_flush_task: flush #1 > >

Re: 2.6.20 libata cdrom

2007-05-01 Thread William Thompson
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 06:32:07AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > [cc'ing linux-ide and Albert, Hi!] And be sure to keep me in CC, I'm not on any of these lists. > William Thompson wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:22:21PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > >> William

Re: 2.6.20 libata cdrom

2007-04-30 Thread William Thompson
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:22:21PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > William Thompson wrote: > > I've been playing with libata on a few machines and I found that this > > machine > > (An old Dell Dimension L866r) gives me this when it loads and does not give > > me >

2.6.20 libata cdrom

2007-04-27 Thread William Thompson
I've been playing with libata on a few machines and I found that this machine (An old Dell Dimension L866r) gives me this when it loads and does not give me access to the cdrom. This is the only machine that I've tested that I know for a fact cannot do DMA on the cdrom. I searched and noticed a s

M68K mac 2.2.18 doesn't compile

2001-01-23 Thread William Thompson
First few things I noticed were things left out. I'm not sure about any of these. The last thing is vmlinux doesn't link. Tons of missing symbols. This is what I did to compile: ---cut--- diff -rux*.o arch/m68k/kernel/setup.c /mnt2/usr/src/linux/arch/m68k/kernel/setup.c --- arch/m68k/kernel/s