On 04/05/15 16:33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[snip]
>
> Queued up as a fix for 4.1, thanks!
Thanks!
>
> But your e-mail client mangles whitespace.
I used "git send-email"; and after quick look at the file I sent
out I realized that the whitespace errors were already in the
mail source and mus
-v -h -E -e "^(LNX|PNP|ACPI)" $hids | sort -u)
do
grep -q \"$hid\" drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c || echo $hid
done
Signed-off-by: Witold Szczeponik
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c
index b193f84..ff6d8ad 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pnp.c
On 15/12/12 01:17, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[snip]
> Both patches queued up for submission as v3.8 material later in the cycle.
Thanks!
--- Witold
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
[snip]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@
7 as well as linux-pm.git/master
as of 2012-12-12.
Signed-off-by: Witold Szczeponik
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas
Index: linux/drivers/pnp/manager.c
===
--- linux.orig/drivers/pnp/manager.c
+++ linux/drivers/pnp/manager.c
@@ -18,11
as linux-pm.git/master
as of 2012-12-12.
Signed-off-by: Witold Szczeponik
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas
Index: linux/drivers/pnp/interface.c
===
--- linux.orig/drivers/pnp/interface.c
+++ linux/drivers/pnp/interface.c
@@ -2
Hi Rafael,
please consider the inclusion of the two patches from
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/29/87 and https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/29/86, as
discussed in our e-mail conversation on Oct 19 and 20. The patches apply
without modification against 3.7 as well. (Since there is no change since 3.
On 18/09/12 23:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday, September 16, 2012, Witold Szczeponik wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> what about the patches 1 and 3 which do not make any changes to the ABI?
>> The first patch simplifies the code, while the third pa
On 03/10/12 17:57, Witold Szczeponik wrote:
[...]
>
> Len and Bjorn,
>
> any chances to include the patches in 3.7? I checked them
> against 3.6 and they applied without any change. Or should
> I resend them individually?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --- Witold
On 18/09/12 23:42, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sunday, September 16, 2012, Witold Szczeponik wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> what about the patches 1 and 3 which do not make any changes to the ABI?
>> The first patch simplifies the code, while the third pa
Hi Rafael,
what about the patches 1 and 3 which do not make any changes to the ABI? The
first patch simplifies the code, while the third patch fixes a problem in the
PNP resource allocation. Any chances to have them included in 3.7?
--- Witold
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On 02/08/12 23:40, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, August 02, 2012, Witold Szczeponik wrote:
>> On 02/08/12 22:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Monday, July 30, 2012, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 09:31:53PM +0200, Witol
On 02/08/12 22:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, July 30, 2012, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 09:31:53PM +0200, Witold Szczeponik wrote:
>>> the aim is to select a PNP ACPI option where resources can be disabled
>>> (or are not needed). E.g
Hi all,
the original mail should have been sent out as a reply to
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/29/85, but it seems as if I clicked the
wrong button.
Apologies for any inconvenience.
--- Witold
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a messag
Hi Len and Bjorn,
is there anything that needs to be done in order for the patch series
to be included in either 3.6 or 3.7? Except for the (viable) question
as to whether or not a sysfs interface should accept complex inputs
(as it currently does and which is not introduced by this patch series
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 09:31:53PM +0200, Witold Szczeponik wrote:
> > the aim is to select a PNP ACPI option where resources can be disabled
> > (or are not needed). E.g., the parallel port of the 600E can be used
> > with and without IRQ lines. The means to allow f
On 29/07/12 21:22, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
[... long snip ...]
>
> Do I understand correctly that you want to disable those things through
> sysfs?
>
> Rafael
>
Hi Rafael,
the aim is to select a PNP ACPI option where resources can be disabled
(or are not needed). E.g., the paral
ct, they should not
be set by the user as the resource templates define the proper settings.)
If the patch is not applied, the resource flags are not initialized properly
and obscure messages in the kernel log have been seen ("invalid flags").
The patch is applied against Linux 3.5.x
g of "disabled" IRQs like
described in the commit 29df8d8f8702f0f53c1375015f09f04bc8d023c1, i.e., with
this patch applied, some vintage IBM ThinkPads like the 600E can allocate the
resources such that all devices can be used simultaneously.
The patch is applied against Linux 3.5.x.
Signed-off-by: Witold Sz
s. Placeholders for these patches
can be found in the comment lines that contain the "TBD" marker.
As the code does not make any changes to the ABI, no regressions are expected.
NB: While at it, support for bus type resources is added.
The patch is applied against Linux 3.5.x.
Si
Hello everybody,
this simple patch series continues the work begun in commit
18fd470a48396c8795ba7256c5973e92ffa25cb3 where ACPI PNP resource templates
with empty/disabled resources are handled.
The aim of this patch series is to allow to set resources as "disabled" using
the "/sys/bus/pnp/
20 matches
Mail list logo
