Hi,
just for the records, as I saw some reports about fs corruption:
I had a case of e2fs corruption under 2.4.0-ac12 on an IDE drive
(Intel BX chipset) yesterday.
I was not able to reproduce it, all I can say it seemed to be related
to a single file on a 1GB partition, filled about 70%. I
Hi,
just for the records, as I saw some reports about fs corruption:
I had a case of e2fs corruption under 2.4.0-ac12 on an IDE drive
(Intel BX chipset) yesterday.
I was not able to reproduce it, all I can say it seemed to be related
to a single file on a 1GB partition, filled about 70%. I
Hi,
> Given two host adapters each with 1 disk of ID 0, how do I tell Linux which
> is sda and which sdb?
[...]
which leads me to the question:
Is there any reason for the (IMHO stupid) "dynamic" naming of
SCSI devices (in contrast to e.g. IDE devices or the "physical"
device naming used in
Hi,
Given two host adapters each with 1 disk of ID 0, how do I tell Linux which
is sda and which sdb?
[...]
which leads me to the question:
Is there any reason for the (IMHO stupid) "dynamic" naming of
SCSI devices (in contrast to e.g. IDE devices or the "physical"
device naming used in
4 matches
Mail list logo
