Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL

2007-03-31 Thread Xenofon Antidides
--- Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 22:41 -0700, Xenofon Antidides > wrote: > > > Patch makes X yuck with any load. I stick with SD. > > Shrug. My milage is different, but hey, it's a work > in progress. If SD > e

Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL

2007-03-30 Thread Xenofon Antidides
--- Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 19:36 -0700, Xenofon Antidides > wrote: > > > Something different on many cpus? Sorry I was > thinking > > something other. I try 50% run + 50% sleep on one > cpu > > and mainlin

Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL

2007-03-30 Thread Xenofon Antidides
--- Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 15:05 +, Xenofon Antidides > wrote: > > - Original Message > > From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: linux

Re: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus SD/RSDL

2007-03-30 Thread Xenofon Antidides
- Original Message From: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Con Kolivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: linux list ; Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:22:49 PM Subject: [test] hackbench.c interactivity results: vanilla versus S