The frags_q is not properly initialized, it may result in illegal memory
access when conn_info is NULL.
The "goto free_exit" should be replaced by "goto exit".
Signed-off-by: Yang Wei
---
net/nfc/nci/data.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
The frags_q is used before __skb_queue_head_init when conn_info is
NULL. It may result in illegal memory access.
Signed-off-by: Yang Wei
---
net/nfc/nci/data.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/data.c b/net/nfc/nci/data.c
index 0a0c265..b5f16cb
Commit-ID: a53837a5458c5b84588dfa3fa510c6a29b7bd4d7
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/a53837a5458c5b84588dfa3fa510c6a29b7bd4d7
Author: Yang Wei
AuthorDate: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 22:36:14 +0800
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
CommitDate: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 09:47:48 -0300
perf clang: Remove
From: Yang Wei
Delete a superfluous semicolon in getBPFObjectFromModule().
Signed-off-by: Yang Wei
---
tools/perf/util/c++/clang.cpp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/c++/clang.cpp b/tools/perf/util/c++/clang.cpp
index 39c0004..fc361c3 100644
From: Yang Wei
Delete superfluous semicolons.
Signed-off-by: Yang Wei
---
arch/nds32/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 2 +-
arch/nds32/mm/init.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/nds32/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/nds32/kernel/cacheinfo.c
index 0a7bc69
dev_consume_skb_irq() should be called in cpmac_end_xmit() when
xmit done. It makes drop profiles more friendly.
Signed-off-by: Yang Wei
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpmac.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpmac.c b/drivers/net/ethernet
dev_consume_skb_irq() should be called in bmac_txdma_intr() when
xmit done. It makes drop profiles more friendly.
Signed-off-by: Yang Wei
---
drivers/net/ethernet/apple/bmac.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/apple/bmac.c
b/drivers/net
Hi all,
When I review ion code in linux-3.18.y, I find a design that may cause a
problem in our product. In the design, cma mem is allocated via the interface
of dma_alloc_coherent ,
and this function will create a map to cpu. Sometimes, we just need cma phys
addr, do not need cpu address.
Hi all,
When I review ion code in linux-3.18.y, I find a design that may cause a
problem in our product. In the design, cma mem is allocated via the interface
of dma_alloc_coherent ,
and this function will create a map to cpu. Sometimes, we just need cma phys
addr, do not need cpu address.
Ralf,
What do you think of this patch?
Thanks
Wei
On 08/04/2014 11:46 AM, Yang,Wei wrote:
ping.
BR,
Wei
On 07/31/2014 07:42 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei
Since there is not indirection page in crash type, so the vaule of
the head
field of kimage structure is not equal
Ralf,
What do you think of this patch?
Thanks
Wei
On 08/04/2014 11:46 AM, Yang,Wei wrote:
ping.
BR,
Wei
On 07/31/2014 07:42 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei wei.y...@windriver.com
Since there is not indirection page in crash type, so the vaule of
the head
field of kimage
ping.
BR,
Wei
On 07/31/2014 07:42 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei
Since there is not indirection page in crash type, so the vaule of the head
field of kimage structure is not equal to the address of indirection page but
IND_DONE. so we have to set kexec_indirection_page
ping.
BR,
Wei
On 07/31/2014 07:42 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei wei.y...@windriver.com
Since there is not indirection page in crash type, so the vaule of the head
field of kimage structure is not equal to the address of indirection page but
IND_DONE. so we have to set
On 07/02/2014 06:19 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 05:19:40PM +0800, Yang,Wei wrote:
Hi Guys,
What about this patch?
The only concern on the face of it is that it removes mutual exclusion
from the pci config write path, where a read-modifiy-write operation
Hi Guys,
What about this patch?
Thanks
Wei
On 07/01/2014 03:41 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei
The pair read/write of accessing pci confiuration space function
has already protected by pci_lock. so remove nano_lock.
Signed-off-by: Yang Wei
---
arch/arm/mach-sa1100/pci
Hi Guys,
What about this patch?
Thanks
Wei
On 07/01/2014 03:41 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei wei.y...@windriver.com
The pair read/write of accessing pci confiuration space function
has already protected by pci_lock. so remove nano_lock.
Signed-off-by: Yang Wei wei.y
On 07/02/2014 06:19 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 05:19:40PM +0800, Yang,Wei wrote:
Hi Guys,
What about this patch?
The only concern on the face of it is that it removes mutual exclusion
from the pci config write path, where a read-modifiy-write operation
On 06/18/2014 07:44 PM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18 2014, Yang,Wei wrote:
On 06/17/2014 10:18 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
That is a strange question to ask. If you did not know that I approved
the patch, why did you insert my Acked-By:?
I added your Acked-By, as when you reviewed V3
On 06/18/2014 07:44 PM, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18 2014, Yang,Wei wrote:
On 06/17/2014 10:18 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
That is a strange question to ask. If you did not know that I approved
the patch, why did you insert my Acked-By:?
I added your Acked-By, as when you reviewed V3
On 06/17/2014 10:18 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
That is a strange question to ask. If you did not know that I approved
the patch, why did you insert my Acked-By:?
I added your Acked-By, as when you reviewed V3, you mentioned that I
*may* add your Acked-by in this patch. If I misunderstood your
Simon, I missed "kexec" string in subject, so please ignore this
version. I would resend it with adding "kexec" in subject.
Thanks
Wei
On 06/17/2014 02:01 PM, Yang,Wei wrote:
Hi Simon,
How about this patch?
Thanks
Wei
On 06/12/2014 01:16 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wr
Hi Simon,
How about this patch?
Thanks
Wei
On 06/12/2014 01:16 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei
The commit b02d735bf was to rearrange the device-tree entries, and
assumed that these entries are sorted in the ascending order. but
acctually when I was validating kexec and kdump
On 06/15/2014 10:42 AM, Yang,Wei wrote:
Its v4, sorry for missing it in subject.
Alan, How about this version?
Cheers
Wei
Regards
Wei
On 06/15/2014 10:40 AM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei
While loading g_mass_storage module, the following warning
is triggered.
WARNING
On 06/15/2014 10:42 AM, Yang,Wei wrote:
Its v4, sorry for missing it in subject.
Alan, How about this version?
Cheers
Wei
Regards
Wei
On 06/15/2014 10:40 AM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei wei.y...@windriver.com
While loading g_mass_storage module, the following warning
Hi Simon,
How about this patch?
Thanks
Wei
On 06/12/2014 01:16 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei wei.y...@windriver.com
The commit b02d735bf was to rearrange the device-tree entries, and
assumed that these entries are sorted in the ascending order. but
acctually when I
Simon, I missed kexec string in subject, so please ignore this
version. I would resend it with adding kexec in subject.
Thanks
Wei
On 06/17/2014 02:01 PM, Yang,Wei wrote:
Hi Simon,
How about this patch?
Thanks
Wei
On 06/12/2014 01:16 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei wei.y
On 06/17/2014 10:18 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
That is a strange question to ask. If you did not know that I approved
the patch, why did you insert my Acked-By:?
I added your Acked-By, as when you reviewed V3, you mentioned that I
*may* add your Acked-by in this patch. If I misunderstood your
Its v4, sorry for missing it in subject.
Regards
Wei
On 06/15/2014 10:40 AM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei
While loading g_mass_storage module, the following warning
is triggered.
WARNING: at drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c:
usb_composite_setup_continue: Unexpected call
Modules
On 06/13/2014 09:39 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Yang,Wei wrote:
On 06/09/2014 02:19 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei
While loading g_mass_storage module, the following warning
is triggered.
WARNING: at drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
On 06/13/2014 09:39 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Yang,Wei wrote:
On 06/09/2014 02:19 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei wei.y...@windriver.com
While loading g_mass_storage module, the following warning
is triggered.
WARNING: at drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
Its v4, sorry for missing it in subject.
Regards
Wei
On 06/15/2014 10:40 AM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei wei.y...@windriver.com
While loading g_mass_storage module, the following warning
is triggered.
WARNING: at drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c:
usb_composite_setup_continue
On 06/09/2014 02:19 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei
While loading g_mass_storage module, the following warning
is triggered.
WARNING: at drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c:
usb_composite_setup_continue: Unexpected call
Modules linked in: fat vfat minix nls_cp437 nls_iso8859_1
On 06/09/2014 02:19 PM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei wei.y...@windriver.com
While loading g_mass_storage module, the following warning
is triggered.
WARNING: at drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c:
usb_composite_setup_continue: Unexpected call
Modules linked in: fat vfat minix
Hi Alan,
Sorry for my late response, as I was 000, Additionally, I am very
grateful for your review.
On 06/06/2014 02:08 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei
While loading g_mass_storage module, the following warning is triggered.
WARNING
Hi Alan,
Sorry for my late response, as I was 000, Additionally, I am very
grateful for your review.
On 06/06/2014 02:08 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014 wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei wei.y...@windriver.com
While loading g_mass_storage module, the following warning
On 06/04/2014 09:45 AM, Peter Chen wrote:
commit d18f7116a5ddb8263fe62b05ad63e5ceb5875791
Author: Robert Baldyga
Date: Thu Nov 21 13:49:18 2013 +0100
usb: gadget: s3c-hsotg: fix disconnect handling
This patch moves s3c_hsotg_disconnect function call from USBSusp
interrupt
ently the
usb_composite_setup_continue
|-> is executed again. It would fininally results in the
warning.
Thanks
Wei
On 06/04/2014 09:20 AM, Yang,Wei wrote:
On 06/03/2014 10:48 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei
While loadin
On 06/03/2014 10:48 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei
While loading g_mass_storage module, the following warning is triggered.
In fact, it is more easy to reproduce it with RT kernel.
WARNING: at drivers/usb/gadget/composite.c
On 06/03/2014 10:48 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei wei.y...@windriver.com
While loading g_mass_storage module, the following warning is triggered.
In fact, it is more easy to reproduce it with RT kernel.
WARNING: at drivers/usb/gadget
.
Thanks
Wei
On 06/04/2014 09:20 AM, Yang,Wei wrote:
On 06/03/2014 10:48 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei wei.y...@windriver.com
While loading g_mass_storage module, the following warning is
triggered.
In fact, it is more easy to reproduce
On 06/04/2014 09:45 AM, Peter Chen wrote:
commit d18f7116a5ddb8263fe62b05ad63e5ceb5875791
Author: Robert Baldyga r.bald...@samsung.com
Date: Thu Nov 21 13:49:18 2013 +0100
usb: gadget: s3c-hsotg: fix disconnect handling
This patch moves s3c_hsotg_disconnect function call from
On 05/22/2014 08:03 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 05/22/2014 03:50 AM, Yang,Wei wrote:
Hi Daniel,
What do you think of it?
Regards
Wei
On 05/13/2014 11:10 AM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei
We do not need to trace read_sched_clock function,
so add notrace attribute
On 05/22/2014 08:03 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 05/22/2014 03:50 AM, Yang,Wei wrote:
Hi Daniel,
What do you think of it?
Regards
Wei
On 05/13/2014 11:10 AM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei wei.y...@windriver.com
We do not need to trace read_sched_clock function,
so add notrace
Hi Daniel,
What do you think of it?
Regards
Wei
On 05/13/2014 11:10 AM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei
We do not need to trace read_sched_clock function,
so add notrace attribute for this function.
Signed-off-by: Yang Wei
---
drivers/clocksource/dw_apb_timer_of.c |2
Hi Daniel,
What do you think of it?
Regards
Wei
On 05/13/2014 11:10 AM, wei.y...@windriver.com wrote:
From: Yang Wei wei.y...@windriver.com
We do not need to trace read_sched_clock function,
so add notrace attribute for this function.
Signed-off-by: Yang Wei wei.y...@windriver.com
On 08/31/2013 05:12 PM, Yu Chen wrote:
>From 1ccf579b871dfd5938ce958f729361a203485c74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yu Chen
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 23:52:31 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Wakeup kexec smp slave cpus in second kernel
In current 85xx smp kexec implementation,master cpu
On 08/31/2013 05:12 PM, Yu Chen wrote:
From 1ccf579b871dfd5938ce958f729361a203485c74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yu Chen chenyu...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 23:52:31 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Wakeup kexec smp slave cpus in second kernel
In current 85xx smp kexec
47 matches
Mail list logo
