On 2 March 2014 21:19, Levente Kurusa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2014-03-02 16:40 GMT+01:00 Joe Perches :
>> On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 16:20 +0100, Levente Kurusa wrote:
>>> IMHO, this message is too big. The one we already have is nice and clean.
>>> I would simply do: s/netdev/[subsystem]/ or something among
/checkpatch.pl to give more detailed
warning message in case printk is used in any patch.
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Chaudhari
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 464dcef..526f33aa 100755
Hello,
I recently ran "scripts/checkpatch.pl" after adding the simplest form
of "hello world" module to the source tree. I used the old "printk"s
in this module and got this warning message:
WARNING: Prefer netdev_dbg(netdev, ... then dev_dbg(dev, ... then
pr_debug(... to printk(KERN_DEBUG ...
Hello,
I recently ran scripts/checkpatch.pl after adding the simplest form
of hello world module to the source tree. I used the old printks
in this module and got this warning message:
WARNING: Prefer netdev_dbg(netdev, ... then dev_dbg(dev, ... then
pr_debug(... to printk(KERN_DEBUG ...
It
/checkpatch.pl to give more detailed
warning message in case printk is used in any patch.
Signed-off-by: Yogesh Chaudhari mr.yog...@gmail.com
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 464dcef
On 2 March 2014 21:19, Levente Kurusa le...@linux.com wrote:
Hi,
2014-03-02 16:40 GMT+01:00 Joe Perches j...@perches.com:
On Sun, 2014-03-02 at 16:20 +0100, Levente Kurusa wrote:
IMHO, this message is too big. The one we already have is nice and clean.
I would simply do:
6 matches
Mail list logo
