Re: Per route MTU settings are broken in linux kernel 3.2

2013-06-24 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 13:45 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 15:44 +0700, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote: > > Hello Ben, > > > > Looks like setting per route MTU (as described in [1]) is broken in > > Linux kernel 3.2. I tested with newer Ubuntu kernels 3.5 an

Per route MTU settings are broken in linux kernel 3.2

2013-06-24 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
Hello Ben, Looks like setting per route MTU (as described in [1]) is broken in Linux kernel 3.2. I tested with newer Ubuntu kernels 3.5 and 3.8 and it looks like problem is fixed there. I filled Ubuntu bug report [2] with more details and sample script which illustrates problem. But since this

Per route MTU settings are broken in linux kernel 3.2

2013-06-24 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
Hello Ben, Looks like setting per route MTU (as described in [1]) is broken in Linux kernel 3.2. I tested with newer Ubuntu kernels 3.5 and 3.8 and it looks like problem is fixed there. I filled Ubuntu bug report [2] with more details and sample script which illustrates problem. But since this

Re: Per route MTU settings are broken in linux kernel 3.2

2013-06-24 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 13:45 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 15:44 +0700, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote: Hello Ben, Looks like setting per route MTU (as described in [1]) is broken in Linux kernel 3.2. I tested with newer Ubuntu kernels 3.5 and 3.8 and it looks like problem

Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686

2005-07-14 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
2005/7/14, Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:50:01PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote: > > 2005/7/14, Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 06:22:28PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote: > > > > I found

Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686

2005-07-14 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
2005/7/14, Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 06:22:28PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote: > > I found patch by Greg Ungreger to fix this problem, but why it's still > > not in mainline? Or it's a gcc problem and should be fixed by gcc folks? >

Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686

2005-07-14 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
2005/7/14, Nathan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 06:22:28PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote: I found patch by Greg Ungreger to fix this problem, but why it's still not in mainline? Or it's a gcc problem and should be fixed by gcc folks? Yes, IIRC the patch was incorrect

Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686

2005-07-14 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
2005/7/14, Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 04:50:01PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote: 2005/7/14, Nathan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 06:22:28PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote: I found patch by Greg Ungreger to fix this problem, but why it's

Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686

2005-07-13 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
2005/7/8, Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:15:52PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm creadted XFS volume on 2.6.10 linux xscale/iq31244 box, then I > > copyied files on it and moved this hard drive to i686 machine. When

Re: XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686

2005-07-13 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
2005/7/8, Nathan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:15:52PM +0300, Yura Pakhuchiy wrote: Hi, I'm creadted XFS volume on 2.6.10 linux xscale/iq31244 box, then I copyied files on it and moved this hard drive to i686 machine. When I mounted it on i686, I found no files

XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686

2005-07-07 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
Hi, I'm creadted XFS volume on 2.6.10 linux xscale/iq31244 box, then I copyied files on it and moved this hard drive to i686 machine. When I mounted it on i686, I found no files on it. I runned xfs_check, here is output: pc299:/home/yura# xfs_check /dev/sda5 dir 128 size is 31, should be 13 dir

XFS corruption on move from xscale to i686

2005-07-07 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
Hi, I'm creadted XFS volume on 2.6.10 linux xscale/iq31244 box, then I copyied files on it and moved this hard drive to i686 machine. When I mounted it on i686, I found no files on it. I runned xfs_check, here is output: pc299:/home/yura# xfs_check /dev/sda5 dir 128 size is 31, should be 13 dir

Re: /dev/random problem on 2.6.12-rc1

2005-04-07 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 14:40 +0200, Patrice Martinez wrote: > When using a machine with a 2612-rc 1kernel, I encounter problems > reading /dev/random: > it simply nevers returns anything, and the process is blocked in the > read... > The easiest way to see it is to type: > od < /dev/random >

Re: /dev/random problem on 2.6.12-rc1

2005-04-07 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 14:40 +0200, Patrice Martinez wrote: > When using a machine with a 2612-rc 1kernel, I encounter problems > reading /dev/random: > it simply nevers returns anything, and the process is blocked in the > read... > The easiest way to see it is to type: > od < /dev/random >

Re: /dev/random problem on 2.6.12-rc1

2005-04-07 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 14:40 +0200, Patrice Martinez wrote: When using a machine with a 2612-rc 1kernel, I encounter problems reading /dev/random: it simply nevers returns anything, and the process is blocked in the read... The easiest way to see it is to type: od /dev/random Any

Re: /dev/random problem on 2.6.12-rc1

2005-04-07 Thread Yura Pakhuchiy
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 14:40 +0200, Patrice Martinez wrote: When using a machine with a 2612-rc 1kernel, I encounter problems reading /dev/random: it simply nevers returns anything, and the process is blocked in the read... The easiest way to see it is to type: od /dev/random Any