Re: [PATCH 04/19] sched, numa, mm: Describe the NUMA scheduling problem formally

2012-11-24 Thread abhishek agarwal
as per 4) move towards where "most" memory. If we have a large shared memory than private memnory. Why not we just move the process towrds the memory.. instead of the memory moving towards the node. This will i guess be less cumbersome, then moving all the shared memory On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at

Re: [PATCH 04/19] sched, numa, mm: Describe the NUMA scheduling problem formally

2012-11-24 Thread abhishek agarwal
as per 4) move towards where most memory. If we have a large shared memory than private memnory. Why not we just move the process towrds the memory.. instead of the memory moving towards the node. This will i guess be less cumbersome, then moving all the shared memory On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 9:55

Re: [Perf] Adding timeout option

2012-10-20 Thread abhishek agarwal
sleep does not offer a good timeout resolution and it is not a good option (according to me) either. perfmon had "timeout" option and i guess, same do oprofile. On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 10/13/2012 08:54 AM, abhishek agarwal wrote: >> &g

Re: [Perf] Adding timeout option

2012-10-20 Thread abhishek agarwal
sleep does not offer a good timeout resolution and it is not a good option (according to me) either. perfmon had timeout option and i guess, same do oprofile. On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com wrote: On 10/13/2012 08:54 AM, abhishek agarwal wrote: Hi folks