On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:53:06AM +0200, Luca Risolia wrote:
> On Friday 14 September 2007 02:09:01 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Luca Risolia wrote:
> > > Hacked-by: Luca Risolia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > On Friday 14 September 2007 00:27:17 Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 03:53:06AM +0200, Luca Risolia wrote:
On Friday 14 September 2007 02:09:01 Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Luca Risolia wrote:
Hacked-by: Luca Risolia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday 14 September 2007 00:27:17 Andreas Herrmann wrote:
This fixes a
Due to commit 02a5e0acb3cb85d80d0fe834e366d38a92bbaa22
kernel build is broken if (CONFIG_COMPAT && ! CONFIG_BLOCK):
CC fs/compat_ioctl.o
In file included from include/linux/raid/md_k.h:19,
from include/linux/raid/md.h:54,
from fs/compat_ioctl.c:25:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 05:07:16PM +0200, Luca Risolia wrote:
> On Thursday 13 September 2007 14:36:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > With current git tree I get an build error
> > for et61x251, if V4L1_COMPAT is not selected:
> >
> > drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c: In et61x251_show_:
With current git tree I get an build error
for et61x251, if V4L1_COMPAT is not selected:
drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c: In et61x251_show_:
drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c:718: error: implicit declaration
of to_video_device
Fix: add VIDEO_V4L1_COMPAT as a dependency
With current git tree I get an build error
for et61x251, if V4L1_COMPAT is not selected:
drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c: In et61x251_show_:
drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c:718: error: implicit declaration
of to_video_device
Fix: add VIDEO_V4L1_COMPAT as a dependency
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 05:07:16PM +0200, Luca Risolia wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2007 14:36:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With current git tree I get an build error
for et61x251, if V4L1_COMPAT is not selected:
drivers/media/video/et61x251/et61x251_core.c: In et61x251_show_:
Due to commit 02a5e0acb3cb85d80d0fe834e366d38a92bbaa22
kernel build is broken if (CONFIG_COMPAT ! CONFIG_BLOCK):
CC fs/compat_ioctl.o
In file included from include/linux/raid/md_k.h:19,
from include/linux/raid/md.h:54,
from fs/compat_ioctl.c:25:
I think this is 2.6.23 material. Please apply.
Thanks.
Regards,
Andreas
--
radeonfb: fix chip definition for Radeon Xpress 200M 0x5975
This fixes a problem introduced with commit
b5f2f4d1a6d7efde39cfb5e1d034981c69f2214c
The commit added a wrong chip definition to radeonfb which causes
a blank
IMHO this is 2.6.23 material. Please apply.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Andreas
--
radeonfb: fix setting of PPLL_REF_DIV for RV370 5B60.
As observed with various Radeon X300 cards console goes blank
without that fix.
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andreas
IMHO this is 2.6.23 material. Please apply.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Andreas
--
radeonfb: fix setting of PPLL_REF_DIV for RV370 5B60.
As observed with various Radeon X300 cards console goes blank
without that fix.
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Andreas
I think this is 2.6.23 material. Please apply.
Thanks.
Regards,
Andreas
--
radeonfb: fix chip definition for Radeon Xpress 200M 0x5975
This fixes a problem introduced with commit
b5f2f4d1a6d7efde39cfb5e1d034981c69f2214c
The commit added a wrong chip definition to radeonfb which causes
a blank
Commit b5f2f4d1a6d7efde39cfb5e1d034981c69f2214c adds PCI ID 0x5975
to radeonfb. But the chip family is wrong. Instead of R300 it should
be RS480.
With 2.6.23-rc5 and radeonfb enabled my Laptop hangs and console
blanks. My ATI Radeon is the following model:
ATI Technologies Inc RS482 [Radeon
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 03:45:12PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 12:58 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > .. which can be found in Acer Aspire 5100.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[EMAIL
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 03:46:29PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> I don't like those tunables. First we should get a look at what values
> we obtain from the BIOS. Could be something with the parsing of ATOM
> BIOS. In any case, we might be able to detect we got wrong values or use
>
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 03:48:07PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Well... ATI used to have printable characters and those were commonly
> used to identify the cards. I'm not sure we want to unilateraly switch
> to hex here...
I see.
How about the following patch?
As an illustration this
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 03:48:07PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Well... ATI used to have printable characters and those were commonly
used to identify the cards. I'm not sure we want to unilateraly switch
to hex here...
I see.
How about the following patch?
As an illustration this
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 03:46:29PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
I don't like those tunables. First we should get a look at what values
we obtain from the BIOS. Could be something with the parsing of ATOM
BIOS. In any case, we might be able to detect we got wrong values or use
subsystem
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 03:45:12PM +0200, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 12:58 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. which can be found in Acer Aspire 5100.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, I
Commit b5f2f4d1a6d7efde39cfb5e1d034981c69f2214c adds PCI ID 0x5975
to radeonfb. But the chip family is wrong. Instead of R300 it should
be RS480.
With 2.6.23-rc5 and radeonfb enabled my Laptop hangs and console
blanks. My ATI Radeon is the following model:
ATI Technologies Inc RS482 [Radeon
.. instead of potentially using nonprintable characters.
I guess the former (odd) concatenation was used to construct name strings
that match the "*_ATI_RADEON_??" macros in include/linux/pci_ids.h
The PCI Id in hex is much more convenient to use. E.g. it can easily be
verified against "lspci
On my Acer Aspire 5100 (with 0x5975) I need to force PLL caclulation.
Most probably the BIOS dividers are incorrect/insufficient. Without pll
calculation console goes blank.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6
As observed with various Radeon X300: console goes blank
without fixing setting of PPLL_REF_DIV.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c
.. which can be found in Acer Aspire 5100.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/video/aty/ati_ids.h |1 +
drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c |1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/aty/ati_ids.h
Hi,
Following some minor changes for radeonfb.
Main purpose is to get it working on my own Radeon cards.
Patches are against current git.
Regards,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
Hi,
Following some minor changes for radeonfb.
Main purpose is to get it working on my own Radeon cards.
Patches are against current git.
Regards,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
.. which can be found in Acer Aspire 5100.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/video/aty/ati_ids.h |1 +
drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c |1 +
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/aty/ati_ids.h
On my Acer Aspire 5100 (with 0x5975) I need to force PLL caclulation.
Most probably the BIOS dividers are incorrect/insufficient. Without pll
calculation console goes blank.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6
As observed with various Radeon X300: console goes blank
without fixing setting of PPLL_REF_DIV.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/aty/radeon_base.c
.. instead of potentially using nonprintable characters.
I guess the former (odd) concatenation was used to construct name strings
that match the *_ATI_RADEON_?? macros in include/linux/pci_ids.h
The PCI Id in hex is much more convenient to use. E.g. it can easily be
verified against lspci -nn
Peter Anvin wrote:
> Andreas Herrmann wrote:
> >
> > It is not equivalent. Usually users check /proc/cpuinfo for their
> > CPU features. Deleting that flag is kind of obfuscation.
> >
> > I guess some time ago people did not care about their "svm" or "vmx"
> > flags. Nowadays (e.g. with kvm)
Peter Anvin wrote:
Andreas Herrmann wrote:
It is not equivalent. Usually users check /proc/cpuinfo for their
CPU features. Deleting that flag is kind of obfuscation.
I guess some time ago people did not care about their svm or vmx
flags. Nowadays (e.g. with kvm) some people are
32 matches
Mail list logo
