Re: Proposal: Linux Kernel Patch Management System

2000-09-14 Thread almesber
Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote: >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rogier Wolff) >So under a "good" patch maintenance system, I'd have liked to generate >the patch, and have it wait until I approve it. > > We talked about doing something like that, but at that point you need > PGP signatures of the

Debugger (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Withdrawl of Open Source NDS Project/NTFS/M2FS for Linu)

2000-09-11 Thread almesber
Kai Henningsen wrote: > A classical memory corruption bug, and like most late-effect bugs hell to > find without some sort of support for poking around in the actual program > state. Agreed. My usual debugging procedure is as follows: 1. try to reproduce the problem 2. make an educated gue

Re: Notebook disk spindown

2000-09-11 Thread almesber
Andre Hedrick wrote: > On Sat, 9 Sep 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Would it be possible to detect when the disk spins up, and do the flush then? > Yes if you had a continuious polling of power status wrt standby. I think the following flushing policy would work almost as well, while remaining

Re: zero-copy TCP

2000-09-03 Thread almesber
Ingo Molnar wrote: > On 2 Sep 2000, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > Besides that you need to do copy-on-write if you want to be able to do > > zero copy on write() from user space [...] > > i agree that this is hard - i'm not sure wether we want to go the pain to > enable anonymous-buffer write()s do zer

Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

2000-09-01 Thread almesber
Andi Kleen wrote: > I'm not sure I understand the question. It would basically work like > booting in BSD or most other Unixes: the bootloader knows ext2 and > reads a filename that you pass as a command line option or a default > from /. That file name would be available in the environment that i

Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

2000-09-01 Thread almesber
Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2000 at 04:26:55PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > But what about GRUB, LOADLIN, SILO, MILO, ... ?) > > I've written scripts do copy any useful piece of (debug) info to > /boot. To cope with MILO, you can use: Actually, this was a trick question, so

Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

2000-09-01 Thread almesber
Andi Kleen wrote: > What you need is a bootloader than can read uncompressed vmlinux directly, > and use that for booting. Then you can always directly extract the System.map > out of the vmlinux using nm or gdb. And then pass this information to the soon to be running system via e.g. an initrd

Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

2000-08-31 Thread almesber
Alan Cox wrote: > Use that argument 50 times and your kernel has grown 100K. Unfortunately > everyone keeps using the argument and forgetting the cumulative effect :-) The thing is that this information is something you access when something is already going wrong. So avoiding a few possible fai

Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

2000-08-31 Thread almesber
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: >> So cat it with a magic lead in after the bzImage gzip block into the bzImage. > Granted, all those are borderline cases, but then 1-2 kB doesn't look > like too high a price to pay for a solution that is inherently robust. Ah, sorry, I first mis-read

Re: [PATCH] 2.2: /proc/config.gz

2000-08-31 Thread almesber
Alan Cox wrote: > > /lib/modules//.config is a big step up from the current situation > > and I'm grateful. But I do want /proc/config.gz in the kernel. > > So cat it with a magic lead in after the bzImage gzip block into the bzImage. > If you dont even know what file you are running for kernel