On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
bbee wrote:
Yeap, I have major issues with SDB FISes which contains spurious
completions but most other spurious interrupts shouldn't be dangerous
and I haven't seen spurious completions for quite some time, so I was
thinking either removing the message
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
bbee wrote:
Yeap, I have major issues with SDB FISes which contains spurious
completions but most other spurious interrupts shouldn't be dangerous
and I haven't seen spurious completions for quite some time, so I was
thinking either removing the message
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
bbee wrote:
Tejun Heo gmail.com> writes:
Andrew Lyon wrote:
ata1: spurious interrupt (irq_stat 0x8 active_tag -84148995 sactive 0x0)
Is this condition dangerous?
Not usually. Might indicate something is going wrong in some really
rare cases. I th
rmance, but it would be
nice if we could resolve this so I can re-enable NCQ and stop patching my
kernels ;)
Thanks for reading and please CC,
bbee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordom
patching my
kernels ;)
Thanks for reading and please CC,
bbee
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Tejun Heo wrote:
bbee wrote:
Tejun Heo htejun at gmail.com writes:
Andrew Lyon wrote:
ata1: spurious interrupt (irq_stat 0x8 active_tag -84148995 sactive 0x0)
Is this condition dangerous?
Not usually. Might indicate something is going wrong in some really
rare cases. I
6 matches
Mail list logo
