(sorry to send this e-mail again, last mail is rejected by server due to
non-acceptable content)
Florian Westphal [mailto:f...@strlen.de] wrote:
>Correct. This is broken since the central spin lock removal, since
>nf_conntrack_lock no longer protects both get_next_corpse and
>conntrack_confirm.
Hi, all:
sorry for sending this mail again, the last mail doesn't show text
clearly.
In function __nf_conntrack_confirm, we check the conntrack if it was
alreay dead, before insert it into hash-table.
we do this because if we insert an already 'dead' hash, it will
block fu
Hi, all:
In function __nf_conntrack_confirm, we check the conntrack if it was
alreay dead, before insert it into hash-table.
we do this because if we insert an already 'dead' hash, it will
block further use of that particular connection.
but we don't do that right.
let
Hi all:
In function nf_nat_setup_info, we need to get the current tuple
which is supposed to send to destination.
If we haven't done any NAT (SNAT or DNAT) for the tuple, then the
current tuple is equal to original tuple,
otherwise, we should get current tuple by invoking
nf_ct_inv
4 matches
Mail list logo