Ok, i will modify it in v2 patch.
On 2020/6/16 14:50, Christian König wrote:
Probably better to remove the duplication of result and r here and
then use "goto err".
Fix the following warning:
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c:585:6: warning:
symbol 'ufs_mtk_fixup_dev_quirks' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: ChenTao
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
Fix the following warning:
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena.c:951:14: warning:
symbol 'siena_check_caps' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: ChenTao
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/siena.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
Fix the following warning:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl818x/rtl8187/rtl8225.c:609:17: warning:
‘rtl8225z2_tx_power_ofdm’ defined but not used
static const u8 rtl8225z2_tx_power_ofdm[] = {
Acked-by: Hin-Tak Leung
Acked-by: Larry Finger
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: ChenTao
Fix the following warning:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl818x/rtl8187/rtl8225.c:609:17: warning:
‘rtl8225z2_tx_power_ofdm’ defined but not used
static const u8 rtl8225z2_tx_power_ofdm[] = {
Acked-by: Hin-Tak Leung
Acked-by: Larry Finger
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: ChenTao
Thanks, i will change it in v2.
On 2020/5/12 23:24, Larry Finger wrote:
On 5/12/20 6:14 AM, ChenTao wrote:
Fix the following warning:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl818x/rtl8187/rtl8225.c:609:17: warning:
‘rtl8225z2_tx_power_ofdm’ defined but not used
static const u8
Fix the following warning:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl818x/rtl8187/rtl8225.c:609:17: warning:
‘rtl8225z2_tx_power_ofdm’ defined but not used
static const u8 rtl8225z2_tx_power_ofdm[] = {
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: ChenTao
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl818x/rtl8187
u/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/gpio/hw_generic.c:109:10: warning:
comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
if ((en < GPIO_DDC_LINE_MIN) || (en > GPIO_DDC_LINE_MAX)) {
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: ChenTao
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/gpi
ics->mode < DRV260X_LRA_MODE ||
drivers/input/misc/drv260x.c:490:23: warning:
comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
if (haptics->library < DRV260X_LIB_EMPTY ||
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: ChenTao
---
drivers/input/misc/drv260x.c | 6 ++--
Fix the following warning:
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c:157:5: warning:
symbol 'fsl_asrc_request_pair' was not declared. Should it be static?
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_asrc.c:200:6: warning:
symbol 'fsl_asrc_release_pair' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: ChenTao
Fix the following warning:
drivers/power/supply/cw2015_battery.c:96:5: warning:
'cw_update_profile' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/power/supply/cw2015_battery.c:712:1: warning:
'cw_bat_pm_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: ChenTao
?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: ChenTao
---
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
index 48e589e9d0f7
Fixes warning because num is u32 and can never be negtative
drivers/input/keyboard/qt1050.c:371:18: warning:
comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
if (button.num < 0 || button.num > QT1050_MAX_KEYS - 1)
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by
Fixes warning because size is uint32_t and can never be negtative
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../powerplay/navi10_ppt.c:1296:12: warning:
comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
if (size < 0)
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: ChenTao
---
drivers/g
:11: warning:
comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
if (pipe < 0 || pipe >= rdev->num_crtc) {
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: ChenTao
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Thank you for your review and modification!
On 2020/4/29 18:19, Georgi Djakov wrote:
From: ChenTao
Fix the following warning:
Move the static keyword to the front of declaration of sdm845_icc_osm_l3
sdm845_aggre1_noc sc7180_icc_osm_l3 sdm845_aggre2_noc sdm845_config_noc
sdm845_dc_noc
Fix the following warning:
sound/soc/sof/imx/imx8m.c:95:20: warning:
symbol 'imx8m_dsp_ops' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot
Signed-off-by: ChenTao
Acked-by: Kai Vehmanen
Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta
---
v1->v2:
- add recipient broo...@kernel.org alsa-de...@a
Thanks a lot, i will resend v2 and add Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org
alsa-de...@alsa-project.org
On 2020/4/29 0:42, Daniel Baluta wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 11:03 AM ChenTao wrote:
Fix the following warning:
sound/soc/sof/imx/imx8m.c:95:20: warning:
symbol 'imx8m_dsp_ops
On 2015/4/1 23:04, Tao Chen wrote:
Define pr_fmt macro with {xen-blkback: } prefix, then remove all use
of DRV_PFX in the pr sentences. Replace all DPRINTK with pr sentences,
and get rid of DPRINTK macro. It will simplify the code.
And if the pr sentences miss a \n, add it in the end. If the
Thanks roger and joe.
I will adopt your suggestions in my v2 patch.
On 2015/3/31 22:57, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 31/03/15 a les 23.14, Tao Chen ha escrit:
Define pr_fmt macro with {xen-blkback: } prefix, then remove all use
of DRV_PFX in the pr and DPRINTK sentences. It will simplify the
Thanks roger and joe.
I will adopt your suggestions in my v2 patch.
On 2015/3/31 22:57, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 31/03/15 a les 23.14, Tao Chen ha escrit:
Define pr_fmt macro with {xen-blkback: } prefix, then remove all use
of DRV_PFX in the pr and DPRINTK sentences. It will simplify the
On 2015/4/1 23:04, Tao Chen wrote:
Define pr_fmt macro with {xen-blkback: } prefix, then remove all use
of DRV_PFX in the pr sentences. Replace all DPRINTK with pr sentences,
and get rid of DPRINTK macro. It will simplify the code.
And if the pr sentences miss a \n, add it in the end. If the
You are right, roger. Thanks.
domid is a u16, it will occupy 5 characters at most. So the biggest
length of blkback name is 8+5+5=18.
At this situation, define BLKBACK_NAME_LEN macro to be 20 is safe.
On 2015/3/26 19:23, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 13/03/15 a les 16.52, Tao Chen ha escrit:
You are right, roger. Thanks.
domid is a u16, it will occupy 5 characters at most. So the biggest
length of blkback name is 8+5+5=18.
At this situation, define BLKBACK_NAME_LEN macro to be 20 is safe.
On 2015/3/26 19:23, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
El 13/03/15 a les 16.52, Tao Chen ha escrit:
On 2015/3/6 20:50, Joe Perches wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 17:33 +0800, Chentao (Boby) wrote:
#ifdef pr_fmt
#undef pr_fmt
#endif
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "xen-pvscsi: " fmt
No, just use add
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "xen-pvscsi: " fmt
before the first #include.
The #ifdef
On 2015/3/6 20:53, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 03/06/2015 09:34 PM, Tao Chen wrote:
Add the {xen-pvscsi: } prefix in pr_fmt and remove DPRINTK, then
replace all DPRINTK with pr_debug.
Also fixed up some comments just as eliminate redundant whitespace
and format the code.
These will make the
On 2015/3/6 20:53, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 03/06/2015 09:34 PM, Tao Chen wrote:
Add the {xen-pvscsi: } prefix in pr_fmt and remove DPRINTK, then
replace all DPRINTK with pr_debug.
Also fixed up some comments just as eliminate redundant whitespace
and format the code.
These will make the
On 2015/3/6 20:50, Joe Perches wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 17:33 +0800, Chentao (Boby) wrote:
#ifdef pr_fmt
#undef pr_fmt
#endif
#define pr_fmt(fmt) xen-pvscsi: fmt
No, just use add
#define pr_fmt(fmt) xen-pvscsi: fmt
before the first #include.
The #ifdef/#undef/#endif isn't necessary
On 2015/3/4 18:34, David Vrabel wrote:
On 04/03/15 18:32, Tao Chen wrote:
Defined the string of {xen-pvscsi: } as DRV_PFX, then use it in the pr
sentences and DPRINTK.
Also fixed up some comments just as eliminate redundant white spaces and format
the code.
These will make the code easier to
On 2015/3/5 0:32, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 18:32 +, Tao Chen wrote:
Defined the string of {xen-pvscsi: } as DRV_PFX, then use it in the pr
sentences and DPRINTK.
Also fixed up some comments just as eliminate redundant white spaces and format
the code.
These will make the
On 2015/3/5 0:32, Joe Perches wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 18:32 +, Tao Chen wrote:
Defined the string of {xen-pvscsi: } as DRV_PFX, then use it in the pr
sentences and DPRINTK.
Also fixed up some comments just as eliminate redundant white spaces and format
the code.
These will make the
On 2015/3/4 18:34, David Vrabel wrote:
On 04/03/15 18:32, Tao Chen wrote:
Defined the string of {xen-pvscsi: } as DRV_PFX, then use it in the pr
sentences and DPRINTK.
Also fixed up some comments just as eliminate redundant white spaces and format
the code.
These will make the code easier to
Hi, Juergen.
Thanks for your advice. I will send a v2 patch based on your suggested
modifications.
On 2015/3/3 17:52, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 03/03/2015 09:37 AM, Tao Chen wrote:
Replace the string of {xen-pvscsi:} in the pr sentences with DRV_PFX,
it makes the code easier to read.
I'm
Hi, Juergen.
Thanks for your advice. I will send a v2 patch based on your suggested
modifications.
On 2015/3/3 17:52, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 03/03/2015 09:37 AM, Tao Chen wrote:
Replace the string of {xen-pvscsi:} in the pr sentences with DRV_PFX,
it makes the code easier to read.
I'm
34 matches
Mail list logo
