ecific(if any)
ntb_structs/variables/logic with the 'intc'(Intel ticker or pick your
string) keyword.
Chetan Loke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.ke
+ ntb_list_add_tail(&qp->ntb_tx_free_q_lock, &entry->entry,
> + &qp->tx_free_q);
> +}
I know you talked about a fixed array. But it's not here yet. So at
all the call-sites, for [r/t]x_free_q , add the 'entry' t
review this design?
Just thinking if this could sit in staging for some time(so that
others get a chance to review/suggest changes as well) and then get
promoted out of staging.
Chetan Loke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a messag
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Paul Clements
wrote:
> Makes sense. Looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: paul.cleme...@steeleye.com
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Chetan Loke wrote:
>>
>> Add in-flight cmds to the tail. That way while searching(during request
>&g
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:49:39PM -0400, chetan loke wrote:
>> Is it ok to rename the following vars for convenience sake?
>>
>> > + struct list_head txq;
>> tx_pend_q - (pending_queue) or tx_ou
gt;txc_lock, &entry->entry, &qp->txc);
> +
> + if (qp->tx_handler)
> + qp->tx_handler(qp);
> +
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + ntb_tx_copy_task(qp, entry, offset);
> +
> + qp->tx_offset =
> +
header);
> +
> + qp->tx_pkts++;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void *ntb_transport_tx_dequeue(struct ntb_transport_qp *qp, unsigned int
> *len)
> +{
> + struct ntb_queue_entry *entry;
> + void *buf;
> +
> + if (!q
7 matches
Mail list logo
