Please ignore the previous mail, i messed it up bad.
On 9/12/07, Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > fresh back from the Kernel Summit, Peter Zijlstra and me are pleased to
> > announce the latest iteration of the CFS scheduler
-- Forwarded message --
From: Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sep 12, 2007 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements
To: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Galbraith <[EMAIL
-- Forwarded message --
From: Roman Zippel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 12, 2007 6:17 PM
Subject: Re: [announce] CFS-devel, performance improvements
To: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please ignore the previous mail, i messed it up bad.
On 9/12/07, Roman Zippel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
fresh back from the Kernel Summit, Peter Zijlstra and me are pleased to
announce the latest iteration of the CFS scheduler development tree.
On 8/3/07, T. J. Brumfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off, I am an avid reader of the LKML but I'm not a developer.
> Admittedly I am a piss-poor C developer who likes to poke around the
> code, play with patches and attempt to learn, but in reality at best I
> pretend I understand it, and
On 8/3/07, T. J. Brumfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First off, I am an avid reader of the LKML but I'm not a developer.
Admittedly I am a piss-poor C developer who likes to poke around the
code, play with patches and attempt to learn, but in reality at best I
pretend I understand it, and I
On 8/1/07, Andev Debi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Im getting the following error while booting the kernel 2.6.22.1-cfs
>
> Aug 1 09:14:09 localhost kernel: [ 30.272161] EXT3 FS on hda8, internal
> journal
> Aug 1 09:14:09 localhost kernel: [ 33.572083] device-mapper: ioctl:
>
On 8/1/07, Andev Debi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Im getting the following error while booting the kernel 2.6.22.1-cfs
Aug 1 09:14:09 localhost kernel: [ 30.272161] EXT3 FS on hda8, internal
journal
Aug 1 09:14:09 localhost kernel: [ 33.572083] device-mapper: ioctl:
4.11.0-ioctl
On 6/15/07, Bernd Petrovitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Says the one without real name who is full quoting including even the
mailing list footers.
hmm. including footers was a mistake. sigh!
but i really dont understand why the real name is needed unless im
submitting some patches!
"What's
On 6/15/07, Kevin Bowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/14/07, Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/15/07, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate
> > and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is
> >
On 6/15/07, dave young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The Documentation/CodingStyle says:
Outside of comments, documentation and except in Kconfig, spaces are never
used for indentation, and the above example is deliberately broken.
Regards
dave
2007/6/15, Kok, Auke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
On 6/15/07, dave young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The Documentation/CodingStyle says:
Outside of comments, documentation and except in Kconfig, spaces are never
used for indentation, and the above example is deliberately broken.
Regards
dave
2007/6/15, Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Willy
On 6/15/07, Kevin Bowling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/07, Glauber de Oliveira Costa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/15/07, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate
and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is
nothing like GPL2
On 6/15/07, Bernd Petrovitsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Says the one without real name who is full quoting including even the
mailing list footers.
hmm. including footers was a mistake. sigh!
but i really dont understand why the real name is needed unless im
submitting some patches!
What's in
On 6/10/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 04:25:55PM +0530, debian developer wrote:
> On 6/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Tarkan Erimer wrote:
> >
> > >> > And maybe another
Please look into http://kernelnewbies.org
On 6/12/07, Federico Paparoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
i'm trying to create a simple system call in a kernel 2.4 distribution.
I read guide/articles like this
http://irfanhabib.wordpress.com/2006/10/01/adding-a-system-call-linux-24x/
All the
What exactly is being copyright'ed here?
On 6/12/07, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- update the copyright notices
- use the default hash function
- fix a thinko in a BUILD_BUG_ON
- add a WARN_ON to spot inconsitent naming
- fix a termination issue in /proc/lock_stat
What exactly is being copyright'ed here?
On 6/12/07, Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- update the copyright notices
- use the default hash function
- fix a thinko in a BUILD_BUG_ON
- add a WARN_ON to spot inconsitent naming
- fix a termination issue in /proc/lock_stat
Please look into http://kernelnewbies.org
On 6/12/07, Federico Paparoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
i'm trying to create a simple system call in a kernel 2.4 distribution.
I read guide/articles like this
http://irfanhabib.wordpress.com/2006/10/01/adding-a-system-call-linux-24x/
All the
On 6/10/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 04:25:55PM +0530, debian developer wrote:
On 6/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Tarkan Erimer wrote:
And maybe another questions should be : How long a copyright owner
can
On 6/10/07, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> licensing under the GPLv3, though. All I've heard are shrill voices about
> "tivoization" (which I expressly think is ok) and panicked worries about
GPLv2 probably forbids Tivoisation anyway. Which is good IMHO even if not
On 6/10/07, Tarkan Erimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
debian developer wrote:
> On 6/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Tarkan Erimer wrote:
>>
>> >> > And maybe another questions should be : How long a copyrigh
On 6/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Tarkan Erimer wrote:
>> > And maybe another questions should be : How long a copyright owner can
>> > hold the copyright, if died or lost for sometime ? if died, the
>> > copyright still should be valid or not ? If
On 6/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Tarkan Erimer wrote:
And maybe another questions should be : How long a copyright owner can
hold the copyright, if died or lost for sometime ? if died, the
copyright still should be valid or not ? If lost, what
On 6/10/07, Tarkan Erimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
debian developer wrote:
On 6/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jun 2007, Tarkan Erimer wrote:
And maybe another questions should be : How long a copyright
owner can
hold the copyright, if died or lost
On 6/10/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
licensing under the GPLv3, though. All I've heard are shrill voices about
tivoization (which I expressly think is ok) and panicked worries about
GPLv2 probably forbids Tivoisation anyway. Which is good IMHO even if not
Now
On 6/2/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's quite common for experienced kernel developers to ack completely broken
patches.
common!!
is'nt that a bit too ...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 6/2/07, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's quite common for experienced kernel developers to ack completely broken
patches.
common!!
is'nt that a bit too ...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
sept. 2006! its been there since quite a long time.
now what happens to my patch submitted to Greg???
On 5/24/07, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El Thu, 24 May 2007 17:45:04 +0800, "Qi Yong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> D'oh, it
sept. 2006! its been there since quite a long time.
now what happens to my patch submitted to Greg???
On 5/24/07, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Diego Calleja wrote:
El Thu, 24 May 2007 17:45:04 +0800, Qi Yong [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
D'oh, it seems the
Heres a patch. It's my first. so any mistakes to be pardoned. :)
--- linux-2.6.21.1/Documentation/HOWTO.orig 2007-05-18 18:54:18.0
+0530
+++ linux-2.6.21.1/Documentation/HOWTO 2007-05-18 18:55:03.0 +0530
@@ -383,26 +383,6 @@ One of the best ways to put into practic
bugs
There is a repetition of the below para in the HOWTO. :)
sorry, me being newbie( thts y i was goin thru the HOWTO) cannot write
the PATCH for this.
Please correct it.
378 Managing bug reports
379
380
381 One of the best ways to put into practice your hacking skills is by
-- Forwarded message --
From: debian developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: May 18, 2007 4:24 PM
Subject: [BUG] HOWTO
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
There is a repetition of the below para in the HOWTO. :)
sorry, me being newbie( thts y i was goi
-- Forwarded message --
From: debian developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 18, 2007 4:24 PM
Subject: [BUG] HOWTO
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
There is a repetition of the below para in the HOWTO. :)
sorry, me being newbie( thts y i was goin thru the HOWTO
There is a repetition of the below para in the HOWTO. :)
sorry, me being newbie( thts y i was goin thru the HOWTO) cannot write
the PATCH for this.
Please correct it.
378 Managing bug reports
379
380
381 One of the best ways to put into practice your hacking skills is by
Heres a patch. It's my first. so any mistakes to be pardoned. :)
--- linux-2.6.21.1/Documentation/HOWTO.orig 2007-05-18 18:54:18.0
+0530
+++ linux-2.6.21.1/Documentation/HOWTO 2007-05-18 18:55:03.0 +0530
@@ -383,26 +383,6 @@ One of the best ways to put into practic
bugs
The feature is not supported most prolly cos of lack of volunteers
pushing it into mainline, or it might be deprecated(is it??).
You are right in pointing out tht this could really save some ppl lots
of trouble.
am ready to help. pls contact for further queries
On 3/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The feature is not supported most prolly cos of lack of volunteers
pushing it into mainline, or it might be deprecated(is it??).
You are right in pointing out tht this could really save some ppl lots
of trouble.
am ready to help. pls contact for further queries
On 3/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
38 matches
Mail list logo
