Re: piix.c and tuning question

2001-02-14 Thread dilinger
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 02:51:03AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: > > hmmm this is my chipset: > > Which motherboard do you have? No clue, it's an old p166, and I'm not about to open up the case.. > > 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 430HX - 82439HX TXC [Triton II] (rev 03) > 00:07.0 ISA

Re: piix.c and tuning question

2001-02-14 Thread dilinger
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 02:51:03AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote: hmmm this is my chipset: Which motherboard do you have? No clue, it's an old p166, and I'm not about to open up the case.. 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 430HX - 82439HX TXC [Triton II] (rev 03) 00:07.0 ISA bridge:

piix.c and tuning question

2001-02-13 Thread dilinger
I have a box w/ the following controllers: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 430HX - 82439HX TXC [Triton II] (rev 03) 00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton II] (rev 01) 00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 IDE [Natoma/Triton II] I

piix.c and tuning question

2001-02-13 Thread dilinger
I have a box w/ the following controllers: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 430HX - 82439HX TXC [Triton II] (rev 03) 00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton II] (rev 01) 00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82371SB PIIX3 IDE [Natoma/Triton II] I

processes drop into uninterruptible sleeps during heavy i/o on 2.4.2-pre3

2001-02-10 Thread dilinger
As the subject states, w/ 2.4.2-pre3, whenever something starts doing heavy i/o (most notably mozilla during startup, diff, recursive greps, etc), it drops into 'D' state: 343 ?S 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/local/src/mozilla/dist/bin/run-mozilla.sh

processes drop into uninterruptible sleeps during heavy i/o on 2.4.2-pre3

2001-02-10 Thread dilinger
As the subject states, w/ 2.4.2-pre3, whenever something starts doing heavy i/o (most notably mozilla during startup, diff, recursive greps, etc), it drops into 'D' state: 343 ?S 0:00 /bin/sh /usr/local/src/mozilla/dist/bin/run-mozilla.sh

Re: [PATCH] maestro3 still oopses?

2001-02-09 Thread dilinger
I'm running it now, looks good. :) On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 11:51:48AM -0500, Zach Brown wrote: > > > The maestro3 driver, included in 2.4.2-pre2 (which I assume is the > > same as maestro3-2.4-20010204.tar.gz, I haven't bothered to try it; > > I'm perfectly happy w/ my patch), oopses upon

Re: [PATCH] maestro3 still oopses?

2001-02-09 Thread dilinger
I'm running it now, looks good. :) On Fri, Feb 09, 2001 at 11:51:48AM -0500, Zach Brown wrote: The maestro3 driver, included in 2.4.2-pre2 (which I assume is the same as maestro3-2.4-20010204.tar.gz, I haven't bothered to try it; I'm perfectly happy w/ my patch), oopses upon shutdown.

[PATCH] maestro3 still oopses?

2001-02-08 Thread dilinger
The maestro3 driver, included in 2.4.2-pre2 (which I assume is the same as maestro3-2.4-20010204.tar.gz, I haven't bothered to try it; I'm perfectly happy w/ my patch), oopses upon shutdown. I'm submitting my patch again, both to the maestro3 maintainer, and to lk this time; please see fit to

[PATCH] maestro3 still oopses?

2001-02-08 Thread dilinger
The maestro3 driver, included in 2.4.2-pre2 (which I assume is the same as maestro3-2.4-20010204.tar.gz, I haven't bothered to try it; I'm perfectly happy w/ my patch), oopses upon shutdown. I'm submitting my patch again, both to the maestro3 maintainer, and to lk this time; please see fit to

Re: xirc2ps_cs driver timeouts/errors

2001-02-03 Thread dilinger
A few minutes ago, I got the following: Feb 3 13:09:10 pea kernel: UDP: short packet: 0/58 .. and the driver hung. I had to reinsert the card to get networking back. This is after 10 hours of uptime, using the patch i sent previously against 2.4.1's xirc2ps_cs. So the answer is, yes, it

Re: xirc2ps_cs driver timeouts/errors

2001-02-03 Thread dilinger
A few minutes ago, I got the following: Feb 3 13:09:10 pea kernel: UDP: short packet: 0/58 .. and the driver hung. I had to reinsert the card to get networking back. This is after 10 hours of uptime, using the patch i sent previously against 2.4.1's xirc2ps_cs. So the answer is, yes, it

Re: xirc2ps_cs driver timeouts/errors

2001-02-02 Thread dilinger
I downloaded the pcmcia-cs 3.1.24 package and hand-merged the bugfix(es?) into 2.4.1's xirc2ps_cs.c. A(n attempt at a) patch to bring 2.4.1 up to pcmcia-cs's version is attached to this email. So far, no problems, but it'll be at least 48 hours before I can say whether it happens or not.. This

xirc2ps_cs driver timeouts/errors

2001-02-02 Thread dilinger
My logs show the following: xirc2ps_cs.c 1.31 1998/12/09 19:32:55 (dd9jn+kvh) eth0: Xircom: port 0x300, irq 3, hwaddr 00:80:C7:1E:28:2A eth0: MII link partner: 0021 eth0: MII selected eth0: media 10BaseT, silicon revision 4 UDP: short packet: 137/58 NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out

xirc2ps_cs driver timeouts/errors

2001-02-02 Thread dilinger
My logs show the following: xirc2ps_cs.c 1.31 1998/12/09 19:32:55 (dd9jn+kvh) eth0: Xircom: port 0x300, irq 3, hwaddr 00:80:C7:1E:28:2A eth0: MII link partner: 0021 eth0: MII selected eth0: media 10BaseT, silicon revision 4 UDP: short packet: 137/58 NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out

Re: xirc2ps_cs driver timeouts/errors

2001-02-02 Thread dilinger
I downloaded the pcmcia-cs 3.1.24 package and hand-merged the bugfix(es?) into 2.4.1's xirc2ps_cs.c. A(n attempt at a) patch to bring 2.4.1 up to pcmcia-cs's version is attached to this email. So far, no problems, but it'll be at least 48 hours before I can say whether it happens or not.. This