On 10/31/07, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> ...does not seem to work too well :-(. It connects with the AP
> (good!), and survives some "normal" use, but it died at first big
> tcpspray (bd!).
>
> Oct 31 01:05:07 amd kernel: phy4: Selected rate control algorithm
> 'simple'
Jens Axboe wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08 2007, dragoran wrote:
so there is no real reason not to allow it for non root users?
removing the check is easy (3 lines)
or are there any other issues/problems?
Andi already explained to you why it can't be enabled for non-root
users. I m
so there is no real reason not to allow it for non root users?
removing the check is easy (3 lines)
or are there any other issues/problems?
(resend sorry for the top post stupid gmail ;) )
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [E
so there is no real reason not to allow it for non root users?
removing the check is easy (3 lines)
or are there any other issues/problems?
On 8/7/07, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > couldn't this be fixed by bumping idle tasks to middle wh
Andi Kleen wrote:
couldn't this be fixed by bumping idle tasks to middle while they hold a
Usually to high.
But it's all complicated and hasn't been done consistently
(there are real time mutexes in the -rt kernel for example,
but there are lots of other locks and they have higher overhe
Andi Kleen wrote:
dragoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Its possible to set the io priority using tools like ionice and syscalls.
But this works only as root.
Why can't a non root user change the priority of his processes to idle?
I understand that realtime priority requires r
Its possible to set the io priority using tools like ionice and syscalls.
But this works only as root.
Why can't a non root user change the priority of his processes to idle?
I understand that realtime priority requires root but why idle?
For instance the beagle trys to set its priority to idle bu
Hello,
I tested cfs v11 on 2.6.20.10 and here are my results:
I started 6 md5sum /dev/urandom and 3 glxgears
with 2 glxgears X was still very responsive...but after starting the
third one there where noticeable lags when using X... so I reniced it
to -10 and its very smooth again.
I am now writing
Hesse, Christian wrote:
On Saturday 10 February 2007 14:23, Hesse, Christian wrote:
On Friday 09 February 2007 22:12, James Ketrenos wrote:
We are pleased to announce the availability of a new driver for the
Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG Network Connection adapter.
Wow, great news
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
dragoran wrote:
Niko Nitsche wrote:
dragoran wrote:
Hello.
I am running FC4 and compiled a vanilla linux 2.6.13.
After booting the kernel I see an error messages that says that it was
unable to load snd-emu10k1 (see dmesg).
In dmesg I got this:
Sep 4 10:09
Niko Nitsche wrote:
dragoran wrote:
Hello.
I am running FC4 and compiled a vanilla linux 2.6.13.
After booting the kernel I see an error messages that says that it was
unable to load snd-emu10k1 (see dmesg).
In dmesg I got this:
Sep 4 10:09:47 chello062178124144 kernel: snd_emu10k1
Hello.
I am running FC4 and compiled a vanilla linux 2.6.13.
After booting the kernel I see an error messages that says that it was
unable to load snd-emu10k1 (see dmesg).
In dmesg I got this:
Sep 4 10:09:47 chello062178124144 kernel: snd_emu10k1: Unknown parameter `'
Sep 4 10:09:47 chello0621
12 matches
Mail list logo
