Liebe Brüder in Christus

2018-06-12 Thread Evangelist Faith
Dear Beloved. Greetings through our Lord Jesus Christ. I bring you good news from Africa. Evangelist Faith Yakubu is my name. Please contact me on my personal email ate.yakub...@yahoo.com I would love to share it with you thank you. Hope to read from you soon.

Liebe Brüder in Christus

2018-06-12 Thread Evangelist Faith
Dear Beloved. Greetings through our Lord Jesus Christ. I bring you good news from Africa. Evangelist Faith Yakubu is my name. Please contact me on my personal email ate.yakub...@yahoo.com I would love to share it with you thank you. Hope to read from you soon.

FROM Ms Faith Titi Attah

2014-10-09 Thread Ms Faith Titi Atth
faithatta...@cantv.net FROM Ms Faith Titi Attah Dearest one I wish you and your family happy moments of life now and forever more amen.Please, I do not have formal relationship with you but because of my present predicament and circumstances I am made to contact you.I have been suffering from

FROM Ms Faith Titi Attah

2014-10-09 Thread Ms Faith Titi Atth
faithatta...@cantv.net FROM Ms Faith Titi Attah Dearest one I wish you and your family happy moments of life now and forever more amen.Please, I do not have formal relationship with you but because of my present predicament and circumstances I am made to contact you.I have been suffering from

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM patch for Linux 2.4.0-prerelease

2001-01-04 Thread Rik Faith
On Thu 4 Jan 2001 14:27:22 -0700, Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It looks like this patch goes further than syncing with xfree 4.0.2, > but syncs with the dri trunk instead. There has been a version bump > in the mga drm module on the dri trunk to add a 'blit' ioctl. XFree >

Re: [Dri-devel] DRM patch for Linux 2.4.0-prerelease

2001-01-04 Thread Rik Faith
On Thu 4 Jan 2001 14:27:22 -0700, Keith Whitwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It looks like this patch goes further than syncing with xfree 4.0.2, but syncs with the dri trunk instead. There has been a version bump in the mga drm module on the dri trunk to add a 'blit' ioctl. XFree 4.0.2

Re: Happy new year^H^H^H^Hkernel..

2001-01-02 Thread Rik Faith
On Tue 2 Jan 2001 08:32:45 +1100, Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 09:39:38 -0800 (PST), > Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On 1 Jan 2001, Adam Sampson wrote: > >> > >> It appears to work (even with the reiserfs patch with the obvious > >> Makefile

Re: Happy new year^H^H^H^Hkernel..

2001-01-02 Thread Rik Faith
On Tue 2 Jan 2001 08:32:45 +1100, Keith Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 09:39:38 -0800 (PST), Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1 Jan 2001, Adam Sampson wrote: It appears to work (even with the reiserfs patch with the obvious Makefile tweak), but the drm

Re: mapping user space buffer to kernel address space

2000-10-20 Thread faith
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you write: > > >On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> >> I stole the last two lines from drivers/char/drm/vm.c, which might need >> to be fixed up also.. He uses the vm_flags above and nevers calls >> get_page, at the very least. > >The DRM code does > >

Re: mapping user space buffer to kernel address space

2000-10-20 Thread faith
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], you write: On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote: I stole the last two lines from drivers/char/drm/vm.c, which might need to be fixed up also.. He uses the vm_flags above and nevers calls get_page, at the very least. The DRM code does

Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modversions

2000-10-18 Thread Rik Faith
On Wed 18 Oct 2000 19:23:54 +0100, David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't you need to deal with the !CONFIG_AGP case correctly? This should already be dealt with in the Makefile -- if !CONFIG_AGP, then the file that we've been talking about (agpsupport.c) isn't compiled. (So,

Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modversions

2000-10-18 Thread Rik Faith
On Wed 18 Oct 2000 10:49:24 -0700, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you >wrote: > > > > > I have no idea what the get_module_symbol() code in question is trying to > > > do, but this should

Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modversions

2000-10-18 Thread Rik Faith
On Wed 18 Oct 2000 10:49:24 -0700, Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: I have no idea what the get_module_symbol() code in question is trying to do, but this should be _fixed_ and not

Re: [PATCH] Make agpsupport work with modversions

2000-10-18 Thread Rik Faith
On Wed 18 Oct 2000 19:23:54 +0100, David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't you need to deal with the !CONFIG_AGP case correctly? This should already be dealt with in the Makefile -- if !CONFIG_AGP, then the file that we've been talking about (agpsupport.c) isn't compiled. (So, yes,

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [2.4.0test10-pre3]drm_proc_init incorrect when multiple device

2000-10-17 Thread Rik Faith
On Sun 15 Oct 2000 23:37:21 +0100, Tigran Aivazian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > or to write a "drmfs" (Al Viro's suggestion) or to abandon the original > > > design of not-sharing the code and do share it (my suggestion but of > > > course it's up

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [2.4.0test10-pre3]drm_proc_init incorrect when multiple device

2000-10-17 Thread Rik Faith
On Sun 15 Oct 2000 23:37:21 +0100, Tigran Aivazian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 15 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote: or to write a "drmfs" (Al Viro's suggestion) or to abandon the original design of not-sharing the code and do share it (my suggestion but of course it's up to Rick and