/proc/pmu/battery_0, like this.
--
flags : 0011
charge : 907
max_charge : 2863
current: -987
voltage: 10950
time rem. : 3600
--
I only intresting with current, that show the system power load.
When I enable dynamic, The current can low at -900.
So, It works. :>
2.
max_charge : 2863
current: -987
voltage: 10950
time rem. : 3600
--
I only intresting with current, that show the system power load.
When I enable dynamic, The current can low at -900.
So, It works. :
2.6.12 + suspend2 + ck3 + dynamic
http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/kernel/linux-2.6.12
[204016]
GPG Key ID ^^-^^ http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/hugang.asc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^^-^^ http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/hugang.asc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:19:46PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> > rjw and hugang did (pretty neccessary) changes to base swsusp (pagedir
> > table -> pagedir linklist), that unfortunately needed update to all
> > the assembly parts. It was series 1/3 upda
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 01:19:46PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
rjw and hugang did (pretty neccessary) changes to base swsusp (pagedir
table - pagedir linklist), that unfortunately needed update to all
the assembly parts. It was series 1/3 update core, i386 and x86-64,
2/3 update
list instead of an array of page backup entries
> during resume.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Hu Gang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...
--
Hu Gang .-.
/v\
// \\
Linux User /( )\ [204016]
GPG Key ID ^
backup entries
during resume.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Hu Gang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
--
Hu Gang .-.
/v\
// \\
Linux User /( )\ [204016]
GPG Key ID ^^-^^ http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/hugang.asc
-
To unsubscribe
xt, offsetof(struct pbe, next));
+
DEFINE(NUM_USER_SEGMENTS, TASK_SIZE>>28);
return 0;
}
--
Hu Gang .-.
/v\
// \\
Linux User /( )\ [204016]
GPG Key ID ^^-^^ http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/hugang.asc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
ume-v4-ppc/include/linux/suspend.h
2005-02-13 12:22:06.0 +0800
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
#ifndef _LINUX_SWSUSP_H
#define _LINUX_SWSUSP_H
-#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_FRV)
+#if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_FRV) || defined(CONFIG_PPC32)
#include
#endif
#include
--
://soulinfo.com/~hugang/hugang.asc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
// \\
Linux User /( )\ [204016]
GPG Key ID ^^-^^ http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/hugang.asc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ
/v\
// \\
Linux User /( )\ [204016]
GPG Key ID ^^-^^ http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/hugang.asc
--- 2.6.10-mm1-axg-swap_mem/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.c~hang2005-02-07
18:17:12.0 +0800
+++ 2.6.10-mm1-axg-swap_mem/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.c 2005-02-07
18:17:2
sbp2 rmmod
hang, But not tested.
--
Hu Gang .-.
/v\
// \\
Linux User /( )\ [204016]
GPG Key ID ^^-^^ http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/hugang.asc
--- 2.6.10-mm1-axg-swap_mem/drivers/ieee1394/sbp2.c~hang2005-02-07
18:17:12.0 +0800
+++ 2.6.10-mm1
tive swap space, then do suspend.
3: after system resume, the sh will crash like.
that can 100% reproduce it my in X86, X86_64, PPC32.
The Software suspend2 has not that problem.
--
Hu Gang .-.
/v\
// \\
Linux User /( )\ [204016]
GPG Key ID ^^-^^ http:
.
that can 100% reproduce it my in X86, X86_64, PPC32.
The Software suspend2 has not that problem.
--
Hu Gang .-.
/v\
// \\
Linux User /( )\ [204016]
GPG Key ID ^^-^^ http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/hugang.asc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
using it here).
>
> > I think this should be "rep movsl".
>
> Yes, it should.
>
I'll change my code.
>
> I have a suggestion.
>
> hugang, you are currently replacing an array of pbes with a list of arrays
> of pbes contained within individual pages.
be rep movsl.
Yes, it should.
I'll change my code.
I have a suggestion.
hugang, you are currently replacing an array of pbes with a list of arrays
of pbes contained within individual pages.
I would go further and replace it with a single one-directional list
of pbes. Namely, I would
applied.
>
> I am aware of that, but you are not going to merge the hugang's patches soon,
> are you?
> If necessary, I can change the patch to work with his code (hugang, what do
> you think?).
>
I like this patch, And I change my code with this, Please have a look,
It pass in qemu
are not going to merge the hugang's patches soon,
are you?
If necessary, I can change the patch to work with his code (hugang, what do
you think?).
I like this patch, And I change my code with this, Please have a look,
It pass in qemu X86_64. :)
Full patch still can get from
http
e from prev version.
2005-1-16.x86_64.diff 18-Jan-2005 09:37 2k
no change from prev version.
2005-1-18.core.eatmem.diff 18-Jan-2005 09:37 1k
Pavel Machek's patch, that's useful fix memory allocation problems.
http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/swsusp/2005-1-18/
Signed-off
18-Jan-2005 09:37 2k
no change from prev version.
2005-1-18.core.eatmem.diff 18-Jan-2005 09:37 1k
Pavel Machek's patch, that's useful fix memory allocation problems.
http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/swsusp/2005-1-18/
Signed-off-by: Hu Gang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hu Gang
with your previous patch
> applied? It would be much easier to apply. :-)
>
http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/swsusp/2005-1-16/
--
Hu Gang .-.
/v\
// \\
Linux User /( )\ [204016]
GPG Key ID ^^-^^ http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/hugang.asc
-
To unsubscribe
? It would be much easier to apply. :-)
http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/swsusp/2005-1-16/
--
Hu Gang .-.
/v\
// \\
Linux User /( )\ [204016]
GPG Key ID ^^-^^ http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/hugang.asc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
u, Can someone owner x86_64 test it.
I disable Flush TLB after copy page, It speedup the in qemu, But I can't
sure the right thing in real machine, can someone give me point.
--
Hu Gang .-.
/v\
// \\
Linux User /( )\ [204016]
GPG Key ID ^^-^^ http:/
^^-^^ http://soulinfo.com/~hugang/hugang.asc
2005-1-16.x86_64.diff
--- 2.6.11-rc1-mm1/arch/x86_64/kernel/suspend_asm.S 2004-12-30
14:56:35.0 +0800
+++ 2.6.11-rc1-mm1-swsusp-x86_64/arch/x86_64/kernel/suspend_asm.S
2005-01-16 13:38:25.0 +0800
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ ENTRY
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:34:37 +0800 (HKT)
Wan Hing Wah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm doing a project which port a component testing program in DOS which
> use GPIB to linux
> Does the Linux kernel support GPIB?
>
>
> I find a linux gpib driver in the linux lab project
>
On 23 Jun 2001 17:49:39 +0200
Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > " " == Jan Hudec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Both seem to have pros and cons. RPC should be easier to write
> > (especialy the server side), but it performs bad with UDP on
> > slow
On 23 Jun 2001 17:49:39 +0200
Trond Myklebust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
== Jan Hudec [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Both seem to have pros and cons. RPC should be easier to write
(especialy the server side), but it performs bad with UDP on
slow links. (NFS did not
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:34:37 +0800 (HKT)
Wan Hing Wah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm doing a project which port a component testing program in DOS which
use GPIB to linux
Does the Linux kernel support GPIB?
I find a linux gpib driver in the linux lab project
http://www.llp.fu-berlin.de/
Hello:
I try to write a kernel modules with RPC (SUN Remote Procedure Call)
,Someone know where can find documents for it.
thanks
--
Best Regard!
Àñ£¡
--
mail from: hugang [ºú¸Õ]
mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello:
I try to write a kernel modules with RPC (SUN Remote Procedure Call)
,Someone know where can find documents for it.
thanks
--
Best Regard!
Àñ£¡
--
mail from: hugang [ºú¸Õ]
mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED
hello all:
--
Best Regard!
Àñ£¡
--
mail from: hugang [ºú¸Õ]
mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
company : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
China Beijing Soul [±±¾©ÖÚÖ¾ºÏ´ï]
--
sd_2.4.4
hello all:
--
Best Regard!
Àñ£¡
--
mail from: hugang [ºú¸Õ]
mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
company : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
China Beijing Soul [±±¾©ÖÚÖ¾ºÏ´ï]
--
sd_2.4.4
Hello all:
---
OPEN: 10.0.0.2 -> 202.99.16.1 UDP, port: 1024 -> 53
ippp0: dialing 1 86310163...
isdn: HiSax,ch0 cause: E001B<--- error !!
isdn_net: local hangup ippp0
ippp0: Chargesum is 0
---
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:46:42 +0200
Cedric Lienart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how can I send a signal like 'kill (pid_t pid, int sig);' from a driver
> module to a user program. When I include signal.h in my module I have
Try use force_sig(int sig, struct task_struct *p), Can read
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:46:42 +0200
Cedric Lienart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how can I send a signal like 'kill (pid_t pid, int sig);' from a driver
module to a user program. When I include signal.h in my module I have
Try use force_sig(int sig, struct task_struct *p), Can read
Hello all:
---
OPEN: 10.0.0.2 - 202.99.16.1 UDP, port: 1024 - 53
ippp0: dialing 1 86310163...
isdn: HiSax,ch0 cause: E001B--- error !!
isdn_net: local hangup ippp0
ippp0: Chargesum is 0
---
Patrick Mackinlay :
If your use redhat 7.0 ;Your will check the kernel "Makefile" ,change the gcc
to kgcc , Try again !
Update the gcc from http://www.redhat.com/
> <_EIP>:
>Code; d2cf9db8 <[reiserfs]create_virtual_node+298/490> <=
> 0: 8b 40 14
Patrick Mackinlay :
If your use redhat 7.0 ;Your will check the kernel "Makefile" ,change the gcc
to kgcc , Try again !
Update the gcc from http://www.redhat.com/
_EIP:
Code; d2cf9db8 [reiserfs]create_virtual_node+298/490 =
0: 8b 40 14 mov
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 22:01:41 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
upgrade the ppp to 2.4.0.
>I have successfully compiled and used 2.4.0 on pentium 133
>system. However because I wanted to try reiserfs I installed
>2.4.1-pre10. ppp is now broken. I get the following error
>
>-
>
>Jan
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 22:01:41 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
upgrade the ppp to 2.4.0.
I have successfully compiled and used 2.4.0 on pentium 133
system. However because I wanted to try reiserfs I installed
2.4.1-pre10. ppp is now broken. I get the following error
-
Jan 23
--- reiserfs_fs.h Sat Jan 13 22:46:42 2001
+++ reiserfs_fs.h.old Sat Jan 13 22:17:45 2001
@@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@
#define op_is_left_mergeable(key,bsize) item_ops[le_key_k_type
(le_key_version (key), key)]->is_left_mergeable (key, bsize)
#define op_print_item(ih,item)
--- reiserfs_fs.h.old Sat Jan 13 22:17:45 2001
+++ reiserfs_fs.h Sat Jan 13 22:46:42 2001
@@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@
#define op_is_left_mergeable(key,bsize) item_ops[le_key_k_type
(le_key_version (key), key)]->is_left_mergeable (key, bsize)
#define op_print_item(ih,item)
--- reiserfs_fs.h.old Sat Jan 13 22:17:45 2001
+++ reiserfs_fs.h Sat Jan 13 22:46:42 2001
@@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@
#define op_is_left_mergeable(key,bsize) item_ops[le_key_k_type
(le_key_version (key), key)]-is_left_mergeable (key, bsize)
#define op_print_item(ih,item)
--- reiserfs_fs.h Sat Jan 13 22:46:42 2001
+++ reiserfs_fs.h.old Sat Jan 13 22:17:45 2001
@@ -1420,7 +1420,7 @@
#define op_is_left_mergeable(key,bsize) item_ops[le_key_k_type
(le_key_version (key), key)]-is_left_mergeable (key, bsize)
#define op_print_item(ih,item)
hello all.
-
ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.0-prerelease. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.0-prerelease/ (default)
-m
hello all.
-
ksymoops 2.3.4 on i686 2.4.0-prerelease. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
-l /proc/modules (default)
-o /lib/modules/2.4.0-prerelease/ (default)
-m
Hello all
I have following code ,and I can not understand the mark line,who can tell
me.thanks.
--
0eb8 movb (%ebx),%al <>
0eba incl %ebx
0ebb movl %edi,%ecx
0ebd shrl $0x8,%ecx
0ec0
Hello all
I have following code ,and I can not understand the mark line,who can tell
me.thanks.
--
0eb8 movb (%ebx),%al IMPORTANT 1-4
0eba incl %ebx
0ebb movl %edi,%ecx
0ebd shrl $0x8,%ecx
Hello all:
old> points = p->mm->total_vm;
change to ---> points = p->pid;
I write a shell to test it,
cat > bin/hello
hello
^D
hello
before change it ,kernel will kill some pid, to change it kernel will kill hello(bash).
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Hello all:
old points = p-mm-total_vm;
change to --- points = p-pid;
I write a shell to test it,
cat bin/hello
hello
^D
hello
before change it ,kernel will kill some pid, to change it kernel will kill hello(bash).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000 11:58:48 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> Hello.
>
> When attempting to boot Linux kernel v2.2.17 from a Compact Flash (CF) device I
> am getting the errors shown below. This CF device is in a PCMCIA form factor
> and is the Master device on the secondary IDE
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000 11:58:48 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
When attempting to boot Linux kernel v2.2.17 from a Compact Flash (CF) device I
am getting the errors shown below. This CF device is in a PCMCIA form factor
and is the Master device on the secondary IDE controller
54 matches
Mail list logo
