On Sunday 17 February 2013 04:08 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
[...]
>
> "supplied nodes" sounds confusing (doesn't reflect direction), IMO. I'd
> rather call it power-supply,supplied-to = <&some_battery>;
>
> But... I'm recalling there was a similar discussion not that long ago, and
> Arnd came up
On 19 November 2012 12:00, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Firstly you tried square braces [ ], I am not sure if that is allowed.
> Can you point me to the specification?
http://www.devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage
"
a-byte-data-property = [0x01 0x23 0x34 0x56];
"
>
> And simply passing 0x50, 0x60 etc.. wil
On 19 November 2012 09:24, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12 November 2012 09:03, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 12 November 2012 01:12, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> I don't think the size is stored in the dtb. It is only in the dts. You
>>> need to define the size in the binding definitions and use '/bits/'
>>>
> On 19 November 2012 09:16, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> (But I'm bouncing the patches to Samuel and Mark anyway, jfyi.)
>
> p.s.
>
> FWIW, I fixed these warnings.
>
> CHECK drivers/power/ab8500_bmdata.c
> drivers/power/ab8500_bmdata.c:146:23: warning: symbol
> 'temp_to_batres_tbl_thermistor' wa
On Saturday 10 November 2012 10:23 PM, Francesco Lavra wrote:
>>> I don't get the point of declaring the char array and copying the string
>>> in it, when you could simply use just the pointer returned by
>>> of_get_property().
>>
>> I am considering a corner case where in 'battery-type' property
On 27 October 2012 20:37, Francesco Lavra wrote:
> On 10/25/2012 08:30 AM, Rajanikanth H.V wrote:
>> From: "Rajanikanth H.V"
>> + bat_tech = of_get_property(np_bat_supply,
>> + "stericsson,battery-type", NULL);
>> + if (!bat_tech)
>> + dev_warn(dev, "missin
did you have a look at arnd and anton comments regarding
'supplied-to' and boolean property
On Monday 01 October 2012 03:19 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2012, Rajanikanth H.V wrote:
>
>> From: "Rajanikanth H.V"
>>
>> - This patch adds device tree support for fuelguage driver
>> - optimi
On Thursday 13 September 2012 08:07 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 13 September 2012, Rajanikanth HV wrote:
>> On Wednesday 12 September 2012 09:06 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:> >
>>> If this is true, I don't understand what makes the 'supplied-to'
>
On Friday 14 September 2012 01:39 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 14 September 2012, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> Power supply subsystem's supplied_to describes not just how driver
>> should notify other devices, supplied_to is more generic stuff, in terms
>> that it describes power supply hiera
On Wednesday 12 September 2012 09:06 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 September 2012, Rajanikanth HV wrote:
>> On Tuesday 11 September 2012 04:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 11 September 2012, Rajanikanth HV wrote:
>
>
On Tuesday 11 September 2012 04:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 September 2012, Rajanikanth HV wrote:
>>>> +Supplied-to:
>>>> + This shall be power supply class dependency where in the
>> runtime battery
>>>> + properties
This patch adds device tree support for
battery temperature monitor driver
Signed-off-by: Rajanikanth H.V
---
.../bindings/power_supply/ab8500/btemp.txt | 52 ++
arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi |8 +
drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c |1 +
This patch adds device tree support for
fuel guage driver
Signed-off-by: Rajanikanth H.V
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ab8500.txt |8 +-
.../devicetree/bindings/power_supply/ab8500/fg.txt | 61 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/dbx5x0.dtsi |8 +
drivers/mfd/ab850
> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:12:01 +
> From: Arnd Bergmann
> To: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linaro-...@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> "Rajanikanth H.V" ,
patc...@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Implement devicetree support for AB8500
> B
> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 18:20:13 +0200
> From: Lee Jones
> To: "Rajanikanth H.V"
> Cc: STEricsson_nomadik_linux ,
> linaro-...@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org, patc...@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: Implement devicetr
B of
memory" would be in the area (1855k kernel code, 135136k reserved, 702k
data, 164k init, 15335296k highmem).Is this right?
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Turcotte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "hv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, March 24,
The other dell6650 with 16G ram under kernel 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 is more oddness.
Memory: 16116752k/16777216k available (1855k kernel code, 135136k reserved,
702k data, 164k init, 15335296k highmem)
- Original Message -
From: "hv" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, Mar
Hi,all:
This is my memory status from "dmesg":
Memory: 4673020k/5242880k available (1334k kernel code, 44532k reserved,
672k data, 156k init, 3800960k highmem)
But I found that available memory size is much less than physical memory
size.My server is Dell6650 with P4 Xeon*4 and 5G Ram.
My kernel
Herbal V: An Incredible All-Natural Healthy Alternative To Va
Herbal V is the All Natural Approach to Male Virility,
Vitality and Pleasure.
Available N o w !
Welcome to the New Sexual Revolution.
It's the all natural male potency and pleasure pill that men
everywhere are buzzing
19 matches
Mail list logo