Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix test for self-signed certificate

2016-02-11 21:34 GMT+08:00 Michal Marek : > If either the Subject + subjectKeyId or the Issuer + Serial number > differs between the certificate and the CA, the certificate is not > self-signed. In practice, both will be equal for self-signed > certificates and both will differ

Re: [PATCH] X.509: Fix test for self-signed certificate

2016-02-11 21:34 GMT+08:00 Michal Marek : > If either the Subject + subjectKeyId or the Issuer + Serial number > differs between the certificate and the CA, the certificate is not > self-signed. In practice, both will be equal for self-signed > certificates and both will differ for CA-signed

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Add firmware signature file check

2012/11/6 Ming Lei : > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote: >> >> To be noted, it doesn't support the firmwares via udev but only the >> direct loading, and the check for built-in firmware is missing, too. > > Generally, both direct loading and udev may request one same firmware >

Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Add firmware signature file check

2012/11/6 Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com: On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de wrote: To be noted, it doesn't support the firmwares via udev but only the direct loading, and the check for built-in firmware is missing, too. Generally, both direct loading and udev may