Larry, thanks for being so patient so far. Tomorrow I plan to take my
laptop to somewhere with coffee and a wireless network. For now
though, can you tell me if these messages could be related:
PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 7 of bridge :00:05.0
PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 8 of
Larry, thanks for being so patient so far. Tomorrow I plan to take my
laptop to somewhere with coffee and a wireless network. For now
though, can you tell me if these messages could be related:
PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 7 of bridge :00:05.0
PCI: Cannot allocate resource region 8 of
On Dec 17, 2007 8:16 PM, Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I hope that you have now convinced yourself that you should be using b43 and
> not messing around
> forcing b43legacy to use a device for which it was not intended.
>
I was convinced the moment I realized it worked exactly the
On Dec 17, 2007 6:18 PM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 18 December 2007 00:12:30 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Well, I'm not sure what you mean by "requires" b43, but I did say that
> > the device uses the b43 driver.
>
> Requires means requires.
>
Ok, noted.
> >
On Dec 17, 2007 5:45 PM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ehm, excuse me.
> What are you doing exactly? In this thread you told me you have
> a device which requires b43:
>
Well, I'm not sure what you mean by "requires" b43, but I did say that
the device uses the b43 driver.
> > I
On Dec 17, 2007 5:35 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this is a mac80211 related problem, then other systems connecting
> to the same ap and using mac80211 would also be affected? Like I said
> earlier, there are five machines connecting to this ap, and I just
> realized one of them has a
If this is a mac80211 related problem, then other systems connecting
to the same ap and using mac80211 would also be affected? Like I said
earlier, there are five machines connecting to this ap, and I just
realized one of them has a ralink card that uses the rt2x00 driver,
which I believe is
On Dec 17, 2007 4:49 AM, Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are you working with wireless-2.6's #everything branch?
I've been working with vanilla wireless-2.6, but I've also tried the
everything branch as well as other trees. Just for good measure, I
just rebuilt the everything branch
On Dec 17, 2007 4:49 AM, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you working with wireless-2.6's #everything branch?
I've been working with vanilla wireless-2.6, but I've also tried the
everything branch as well as other trees. Just for good measure, I
just rebuilt the everything branch and
If this is a mac80211 related problem, then other systems connecting
to the same ap and using mac80211 would also be affected? Like I said
earlier, there are five machines connecting to this ap, and I just
realized one of them has a ralink card that uses the rt2x00 driver,
which I believe is
On Dec 17, 2007 5:35 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this is a mac80211 related problem, then other systems connecting
to the same ap and using mac80211 would also be affected? Like I said
earlier, there are five machines connecting to this ap, and I just
realized one of them has a ralink
On Dec 17, 2007 5:45 PM, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ehm, excuse me.
What are you doing exactly? In this thread you told me you have
a device which requires b43:
Well, I'm not sure what you mean by requires b43, but I did say that
the device uses the b43 driver.
I don't know
On Dec 17, 2007 6:18 PM, Michael Buesch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 18 December 2007 00:12:30 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I'm not sure what you mean by requires b43, but I did say that
the device uses the b43 driver.
Requires means requires.
Ok, noted.
Sorry, I should have
On Dec 17, 2007 8:16 PM, Larry Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope that you have now convinced yourself that you should be using b43 and
not messing around
forcing b43legacy to use a device for which it was not intended.
I was convinced the moment I realized it worked exactly the same as
On Dec 17, 2007 1:52 AM, Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One major difference between bcm43xx-SoftMAC and b43-mac80211 is that the
> former always used a fixed
> rate; whereas mac80211 tries to adjust the bit rate according to the
> transmission conditions.
> Perhaps it isn't working
On Dec 15, 2007 7:38 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'll build latest wireless git without ipv6 late tonight.
Ok, built and tested, and it's actually faster! Although still not as
fast as bcm43xx or softmac or whatever the problem is, I was getting a
steady 200 kB/s (as opposed to 500 kB/s
On Dec 15, 2007 7:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll build latest wireless git without ipv6 late tonight.
Ok, built and tested, and it's actually faster! Although still not as
fast as bcm43xx or softmac or whatever the problem is, I was getting a
steady 200 kB/s (as opposed to 500 kB/s for
On Dec 17, 2007 1:52 AM, Larry Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One major difference between bcm43xx-SoftMAC and b43-mac80211 is that the
former always used a fixed
rate; whereas mac80211 tries to adjust the bit rate according to the
transmission conditions.
Perhaps it isn't working quite
On Dec 15, 2007 2:18 AM, Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It will take a while to finish looking over those logs, but are you using
> ipv6? If not, please
> blacklist the ipv6 module to prevent it from loading - add the line
> 'blacklist ipv6' to file
> /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist. In
On Dec 15, 2007 2:18 AM, Larry Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It will take a while to finish looking over those logs, but are you using
ipv6? If not, please
blacklist the ipv6 module to prevent it from loading - add the line
'blacklist ipv6' to file
/etc/modprobe.d/blacklist. In some
On Dec 14, 2007 9:27 PM, Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I suspect that mac80211 is doing something that your router does not like. Do
> you have any chance to
> capture the traffic between your computer and the router by using a second
> wireless computer running
> kismet or
On Dec 14, 2007 7:58 PM, Larry Finger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Actually, can you explain why, from the technical point of view, the
> > version 4
> > firware is better than version 3, please?
>
> I will be very interested in Michael's answer to this question;
On Dec 14, 2007 7:58 PM, Larry Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Actually, can you explain why, from the technical point of view, the
version 4
firware is better than version 3, please?
I will be very interested in Michael's answer to this question; however, my
On Dec 14, 2007 9:27 PM, Larry Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect that mac80211 is doing something that your router does not like. Do
you have any chance to
capture the traffic between your computer and the router by using a second
wireless computer running
kismet or wireshark? A
24 matches
Mail list logo
