Because chained_irq_enter() has already called chip->irq_mask() and
chip->irq_ack(), also chained_irq_exit() will call chip->irq_unmask(),
so it's not necessary to call chip->irq_*() here.
Signed-off-by: Perr Zhang
Acked-by: Tomasz Figa
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
---
drivers/pinc
Because chained_irq_enter() has already called chip->irq_mask() and
chip->irq_ack(), also chained_irq_exit() will call chip->irq_unmask(),
so it's not necessary to call chip->irq_*() here.
Signed-off-by: Perr Zhang
---
drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 6 +-
1 file changed,
Sent using Zoho Mail
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 09:59:41 -0700 Krzysztof Kozlowski
wrote
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 06:17:07PM +0800, perr wrote:
> > Because chained_irq_enter() has already called chip->irq_mask() and
> > chip->irq_ack(), also chained_irq_exit() will call chip->irq_u
Because chained_irq_enter() has already called chip->irq_mask() and
chip->irq_ack(), also chained_irq_exit() will call chip->irq_unmask(),
so it's not necessary to call chip->irq_*() here.
Signed-off-by: Perr Zhang
---
drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 6 +-
1 file changed,
4 matches
Mail list logo