On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 8:14 PM, wrote:
> From: Elad Wexler
>
> Driver doesn't do anything special in 'module_init'.
>
> 'module_platform_init' makes the code more readable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Elad Wexler
NAK.
By moving to module_platform_init() you make this module unloadable.
Currently it i
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Rob Landley wrote:
>> Some of us can't ship GPLv3 binaries and are looking forward to the day LLVM
>> or some such provides a complete solution.
>
> Sorry, I didn't have a coffee yet, but whi
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 25.09.2013, 08:59 -0500 schrieb Rob Landley:
>> On 09/24/2013 01:36:56 PM, Thomas Meyer wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Is there such a thing?
>>
>> In the kernel's vfs layer?
>
> Yes, that would be a nice feature!
You mean reflink
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Markus Elfring wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I became interested in an use case where I want to pass customised data from
> the
> boot command-line to other user processes. I have read the available
> documentation in the way that kernel modules provide such a means to get
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 26.08.2013 12:08, schrieb Richard Weinberger:
>> If no free PEBs are available refill_wl_user_pool() must not
>> return with -ENOSPC immediately.
>> It has to block till produce_free_peb() produced a free PEB.
>>
>> Reported-and-Teste
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> Today I run latest git tree with a patched UML (this patch + one for xterm
> issues) and got 2 times a core dump
> when I fuzzy test an UML machine with a nearly identical scenario as already
> described but just shutdowned
> both UML imag
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Marco Stornelli
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is an attempt to include pramfs in mainline. At the moment pramfs
> has been included in LTSI kernel. Since last review the code is more
> or less the same but, with a really big thanks to Vladimir Davydov and
> Parallels,
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Ian Jeffray wrote:
> All,
>
> A previously stable solid system Core2 upgraded from 3.9.2 to
> 3.11 is now showing oops's more than every 24 hours.
>
> Would appreciate any advice on how to begin to help debug this
> as it appears to be deep in areas of the kernel I
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Michael Opdenacker
wrote:
> This patch proposes to remove the IRQF_DISABLED flag from h8300 architecture
> code. It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker
> ---
> arch/h8300/kernel/timer/itu.c | 2 +-
> arc
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 11:46:13 -0400
>> Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>
>>> > Fedora should really look into defaulting to syslinux.
>>>
>>> Doesn't support all the usecases we have, and it's not m
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> There is plenty of consumer hardware (e.g., mac books) that does not use
> AT keyboards or PS/2 mice. It therefore makes sense for distro kernels
> to build the related drivers as modules to avoid loading them on hardware
> that does not need
Hi!
Today one of my computers crashed with the following panic.
The machine is heavily using reflinks.
Looks like it managed to hit a CATCH_BH_JBD_RACES error check.
<3>[37628.934461] (reflink,512,0):ocfs2_reflink_ioctl:4459 ERROR: status = -17
<3>[37628.943160] (kworker/u:2,809,1):ocfs2_read_blo
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 08/29/2013 11:34 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>
>> On 08/30/2013 12:53 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>
>>> On 08/29/2013 08:59 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
The related error (allmodconfig for h8300):
arch/h8300/kernel/setup.c: In fun
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 08/27/2013 08:06 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 05:53:14PM -0400, bfields wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:36:40PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
On Sun 11-08-13 11:48:49, Toralf Förster wrote:
> so that the s
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Ezequiel Garcia
wrote:
> Some platforms have MMIO regions that are shared across orthogonal
> subsystems. This commit implements a possible solution for the
> thread-safe access of such regions through a spinlock-protected API.
>
> Concurrent access is protected wi
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> I'll probably delay committing it until tomorrow, in the hope that
> somebody using one of the other architectures will at least ack that
> it compiles. I'm re-attaching the patch (with the two "logn" -> "long"
> fixes) just to encourage tha
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Bob Smith wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>
>> Otherwise, to accept this code, I need to see a way that normal users
>> can use it (i.e. no root or mknod), and that it can handle namespaces
>> and the security interface that the kernel has to support. To do s
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Tony Lu wrote:
>
>> With this change, tile Linux now supports address-space layout
>> randomization for shared objects, stack, heap and vdso.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tony Lu
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Metcalf
>> ---
>> arch/til
Adding Al again, someone dropped him from the CC list...
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Lennart,
>
> Am 23.07.2013 00:32, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
>> On Mon, 22.07.13 16:13, Ramkumar Ramachandra (artag...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> [Corrected Lennart's email ID]
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:46 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 10:42 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> We want to reduce pvops and pvops users, not increase them...
>>
>> I see. So the future is true virtualization which exposes the
>> underlying hardware, like
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> does not work on 64-bit hosts, because the build-infrastructure is
> hard-wired to pick a 32-bit defconfig when ARCH=um. This series fixes
> the problem.
>
> [1/3] is somewhat unrelated to the series, and I happened to notice it
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 03:32:27PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> I just got a new wireless router and stumbled across an odd set of
>> out-of-tree modules, where two GPL licensed modules were used by a third
>> proprietary licensed one.
>>
>>
Let's do the same as in 2009[1] and finish this thread.
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/reiserfs-devel/msg01543.html
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http:
Hi!
While playing with user namespaces my kernel crashed under heavy load.
Kernel is 3.9.0 plus some trivial patches.
[35355.882105] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
at 01a8
[35355.883056] IP: [] mem_cgroup_page_lruvec+0x79/0x90
[35355.883056] PGD 0
[35355.883056]
Please don't feed the trolls.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Mats Liljegren
wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Amit C
> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Linux OS Desktop has not become very popular because of the following
>> reasons:
>>
>> 1. It is not because its GUI is not good.
>> 2. It is
rm arch part kernel code ?
See MAINTAINERS file.
CC'ing linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
>
> Thanks
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wang, Yalin
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 3:38 PM
> To: 'richard -rw- weinberger'
> Cc: linux-a...@vger.kernel.o
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:12 AM, johnspaul92 wrote:
> Where can i find the definition of the sys_access function???
> I tried checking in syscalls.h. But there i found only the declaration.
> Where can i find the definition so that i can understand what that function
> actually does.
Use git gre
Hi!
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am a new comer to this mailing list ,
> I am happy to join this community .
>
> I have a bug reported from our android phones which is caused by the system
> call .
> It seems like kernel bugs from my view .
Is this a unm
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:47 AM, johnspaul92 wrote:
> When i tried to apply the GrSecurity patch on linux kernel 3.10 and there the
> patch actually modifies atomic_set to atomic_set_unchecked. When i checked
> the gcc patch to compile this code it just redefines atomic_set as
> atomic_set_uncheck
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> fixes
>
> CC kernel/auditfilter.o
> kernel/auditfilter.c: In function ‘audit_data_to_entry’:
> kernel/auditfilter.c:426:3: warning: this decimal constant is unsigned
> only in ISO C90 [enabled by default]
>
> Signed-off-by: Tor
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 05:55:22PM +0700, Antoine Martin wrote:
>> Linus' vm patches broke the UML build in 3.0.75 onwards:
>>
>> CC mm/memory.o
>> mm/memory.c: In function ‘vm_iomap_memory’:
>> mm/memory.c:2363:2: error: implicit declaratio
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:00 PM, wrote:
> richard -rw- weinberger 2013-05-13
> 16:08:35:
>
>>
>> I tried to apply/test your patch.
>> It has lots of white spaces damages.
>> Can you please resend it using git send-email?
>> And also run checkpatc
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Timo Teras wrote:
> I got the below with Linux 3.8.7-grsec and 3.9.2-grsec. Where as
> 3.6.11-grsec is a known good. I believe the same would happen on on
> vanilla kernels too.
If you post to linux-kernel@vger, please make sure that you're using a
vanilla kernel.
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:51 AM, Mehaffey, John
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I am proposing a microconference on fastboot at the Linux Plumber's
> conference 2013 in New Orleans. The goal is to get to sub 1S boot times for a
> large (IVI) system using NAND flash. This pushes the state of the art, and
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:07 PM, richard -rw- weinberger
> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Michael Ellerman
>> wrote:
>
>>> Possibly. We're cross compiling these on powerpc so perha
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Michael Ellerman
wrote:
>
>
> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
>>On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 11:17 PM, richard -rw- weinberger
>> wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Sun
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:31 AM, wrote:
> richard -rw- weinberger write 2013-05-03
> 03:21:33:
>
>> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:30 AM, wrote:
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
>> >> > Hello,
>&
Geert,
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> However, the full list of errors isn't that unmanageable, so I'm following
>> up with a digested list...
>
> arch/um/drivers/cow_user.c:216: error: implicit declaration of functi
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 5:40 AM, quickbooks office
wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 12:09 AM, quickbooks office
>> wrote:
>>> Please Merge VirtualBox Kernel Modules into the Kernel.
>>>
>>> --
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:30 AM, wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > Sorry, there is still something wrong with the previous
> patch's
>> > format, try to submit it again. When use ubi fastmap, there is a
> memory
>> > leak which will make destr
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Warlich, Christof
wrote:
> Mikael Pettersson writes:
>> You're looking at the wrong header: glibc-2.17/sysdeps/i386/sys/ucontext.h
>> is legacy SVR4.
>> Instead look at glibc-2.17/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86/sys/ucontext.h.
>>
>> (If the old one got installed on y
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 04/29/2013 02:45:45 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Serge,
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 15, 201
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 6:08 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In Ext3 performance can be improved by placing journal on SSD. I am able
> to place ext3 journal on an external device. Can you please help me
> placing ext3 journal on mtd device.
*very* bad idea.
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from thi
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> Hi Serge,
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> you mention that after creating a new user namespace you at first have
>> all capabilities in the new ns. You don't explicitly mention (or I
>> mi
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
> Hello,
> Sorry, there is still something wrong with the previous patch's
> format, try to submit it again. When use ubi fastmap, there is a memory
> leak which will make destroy_ai() fail to free the slab alloced in
> scan_fast(). The follow
Hi!
If I create a process with CLONE_NEWNS|CLONE_NEWUSER set, how can I
modify the mount namespace later?
I thought I simply can run setns(/proc//ns/mnt) within my
privileged process which resists in the initial userns and then mount
whatever I want into the child's mount namespace.
But this fail
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Eric W. Biederman
wrote:
> richard -rw- weinberger writes:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
>> wrote:
>>>Inside the user namespace, the shell has user and group ID 0,
>>>
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> The util-linux release 2.23 is available at
>
>ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/v2.23
>
> Feedback and bug reports, as always, are welcomed.
>
>Karel
>
>
>
> Util-linux 2.23 Release Notes
> =
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
> The file header declares the code to be covered by GPL v2 only, so use
> explicit v2 for MODULE_LICENSE, too.
Doesn't this apply to almost any driver?
I don't understand why you explicitly "fix" this one.
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsub
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
>Inside the user namespace, the shell has user and group ID 0,
>and a full set of permitted and effective capabilities:
>
>bash$ cat /proc/$$/status | egrep '^[UG]id'
>Uid: 000
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Stephan von Krawczynski
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> can some kind soul please explain how I can get my serial port back under
> kernel 3.8.X. Earlier kernels showed:
>
> Jan 10 13:57:18 mybox kernel: [0.712829] serial8250: ttyS0 at I/O 0x3f8
> (irq = 4) is a 16550A
>
>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>
>
> Change KBUILD_CFLAGS to -O0 in Makefile and got the compilation error as
> below.
> Is the Linux kernel support -O0 optimization flag?
No. If I'm not mistaken we need this to make sure that the compiler
inlines some functions.
In your ca
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 04/12/2013 07:41 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>> You .config build perfectly fine here.
>> Have you tried a "make mrproper"?
> ick - I forgot to un-apply your patch you sent to me related to the
&
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 04/12/2013 05:00 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>> Did you specify ARCH=um and SUBARCH=?
> Only ARCH=um, but the full line give the same :
>
> $ make ARCH=um SUBARCH=x86
> scripts/kconfig/conf --silentoldconfi
David,
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:51 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> -SUBARCH := $(shell uname -m | sed -e s/i.86/i386/ -e s/sun4u/sparc64/ \
> +SUBARCH := $(shell uname -m | sed -e s/i.86/x86/ -e s/x86_64/x86/ \
> + -e s/sun4u/sparc64/ \
>
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> I get :
> ..
> CC kernel/bounds.s
> GEN include/generated/bounds.h
> CC arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s
> In file included from
> /home/tfoerste/devel/linux/arch/um/include/asm/mman.h:5:0,
> from
> /home/t
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 9:05 PM, Alex Williamson
wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> Here's one small fix for vfio that I'd like to get in for 3.9;
> tightening the range checking around a vfio ioctl. Thanks!
>
> Alex
>
> The following changes since commit 25e9789ddd9d14a8971f4a421d04f282719ab733:
>
> vfio:
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 04/06/2013 02:47 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
>> On 04/06/2013 01:43 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>>>> What I get with the this trinity command line
>>>>
>>>> gt; trinity --children 2 -c ma
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Toralf Foerster wrote:
>> On 03/25/2013 11:53 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > On Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:28:36 +0100 Toralf Foerster
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> > Using trinity I often trigger under a user mode linux image with ho
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:24 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 03/14/2013 10:21 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
>> hah, strndup_user taking a signed long instead of a size_t as it's length
>> arg.
>>
>> either it needs to change, or it needs an explicit check for < 1
>>
>> I wonder how many other paths make
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> The following WARNING: can be triggered sometimes with trinity [1] under a
> user mode linux image
> using the SLUB allocator (and not with SLAB)
>
>
> 2013-03-14T19:09:51.071+01:00 trinity kernel: [ cut here
> ]
>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> The following WARNING: can be triggered sometimes with trinity [1] under a
> user mode linux image
> using the SLUB allocator (and not with SLAB)
>
>
> 2013-03-14T19:09:51.071+01:00 trinity kernel: [ cut here
> ]
>
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Alexey Vlasov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 08:20:23AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>> What are gr_ symbols ?
>
> This is grsecurity patches ;)
Please reproduce without grsec...
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubsc
sing
try_to_grab_pending())
introduced that regression, it is time to CC Tejun.
>
> On 03/01/2013 01:25 PM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Using 3.8.1 OCFS2 crashes while joining nodes to the cluster.
>> The cluster consists of 10 nodes, while no
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Srinivas Eeda wrote:
> On 02/27/2013 03:52 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:54 AM, richard -rw- weinberger
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Srinivas Eeda
>>>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:54 AM, richard -rw- weinberger
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Srinivas Eeda
> wrote:
>> This is due to a race in lock mastery/purge. I have recently fixed this
>> problem but haven't yet submitted the patch to mainline. Please file a
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Srinivas Eeda wrote:
> This is due to a race in lock mastery/purge. I have recently fixed this
> problem but haven't yet submitted the patch to mainline. Please file a
> Service request with Oracle to get a one-off fix.
Please submit the patch immediately.
Why doe
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> Moin,
>
> got this wit the attached .config :
>
> ...
> CC kernel/mutex.o
> CC kernel/hrtimer.o
> kernel/mutex.c:34:37: error: include/asm-generic/mutex-null.h: Input/output
> error
The compiler got -EIO while opening includ
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> until now I could successfully suppress my curiosity about those tip:foo
> messages, but as the bot (or one of them) has now catched me too, I want to
> ask what it is.
>
> Searching for "tip(-)bot" or similiar doesn't reveal s
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> This is the 2nd time in a row that a stable kernel (3.7.8 currently) crashes
> in such a way
> that even the sys-rq key doesn't work any longer.
> Found nothing in the log. The screen shot is here [1]. First time this issue
> was reported
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:27:12PM +0100, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> > Upon exec(), we determine if executable is signed. If it is, then locks
>> &g
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Upon exec(), we determine if executable is signed. If it is, then locks
> down the pages in memory (using MAP_LOCKED) and verfies the signature.
> If signature does not match, process is killed. Unsigned processes
> don't get affected at all.
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
wrote:
> to document the reason why a firmware is not present
>
> Cc: Daniel Drake
> Cc: Ulrich Kunitz
> Cc: David Woodhouse
> Cc: Ben Hutchings
> Cc:
> Cc:
> Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez
> ---
> MISSING | 20
>
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Building ewrk3.o triggers this GCC warning:
> drivers/net/ethernet/dec/ewrk3.c: In function '__check_irq':
> drivers/net/ethernet/dec/ewrk3.c:1915:1: warning: return from
> incompatible pointer type [enabled by default]
>
> This can be
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Block device emulation on top of ubi volumes with read/write support.
> Block devices get automatically created for each ubi volume present.
>
> Each ubiblock is fairly cheap since it's based on workqueues
> and not on threads.
>
> Read/wr
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Nick Bowler wrote:
> On 2012-11-14 13:05 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 15:03:00 -0400
>> Nick Bowler wrote:
>>
>> > There is absolutely no reason to crash the kernel when we have a
>> > perfectly good return value already available to use for
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, David R wrote:
> Spell "logarithmic" correctly in sched debug.
>
> --- kernel/sched/debug.c.orig 2012-11-13 11:52:59.0 +
> +++ kernel/sched/debug.c2012-11-13 11:53:30.0 +
> @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@
>
> static const char *sched_tunable_
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> While implementing the same functionality for arm, I've noticed that
> memtest does an unnecessary round to zero the memory. Just reversing the
> order so that the last round writes 0s spares that round.
>
> While there, I've also changed t
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Troy Abercrombia wrote:
> Hello Kamal
>
> Unfortunately, We're not able to upstream the driver as it would be denied
> because it changes the Linux mouse structure framework.
Then write a sane driver or submit patches which add the features you
need in the Linux
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Melby Sjamsuddin
wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> I tested 3.5.7 and everything seems to be normal, so it must be 3.6.
> Let me know if there's anything I can help.
Now you can do a git bisect between 3.5 and 3.6 to find the bad commit.
And you can report the issue (in det
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Melby Sjamsuddin
wrote:
> I have a network issue with two routers at work. They're setup with vrrp and
> do load balancing with
> 'ip route nexthop' and iptables connmark, using different vlan to connect to
> different modems.
>
> They have been working fine unti
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I can reliably trigger the following warning by physically detaching my disk
> array after
> stopping md1.
>
> ---cut---
> [ 149.780554] md: md1 stopped.
> [ 149.780559] md: unbind
> [ 149.782025] md: export_rdev(sdh1)
> [ 14
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
> Current mem= implementation seems buggy because specification and
> implementation doesn't match. Current mem= has been working
> for many years and it's not buggy, it works as expected. So
> we should update the specification.
>
> Signed-off-
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton
> Reviewed-by: richard -rw- weinberger
I did *not* review this patch, nor did Andrew.
--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe li
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 4:27 AM, Richard Yang
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:56:02PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:34:43 +0200 (CEST)
>>Jiri Kosina wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 19 Oct 2012, Stefani Seibold wrote:
>>>
>>> > > > In kfifo_in marco, one piece of code is arounded
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> You are wrong on three counts:
>
> - As I mentioned it in my first mail to you this is not the
>same as 'vm run': you still have a qemu-root.img while
>tools/kvm does not ...
>
>'vm run' works without having any disk image around,
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 01:07:31PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> Why couldn't this script just be a wrapper around qemu?
>>
>> I get the kvm developers developing features that isn't ideal, but for
>> the quick boot a kernel tests, I don't s
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Richard Yang
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 07:23:09AM +0200, Stefani Seibold wrote:
>>
>>Am Freitag, den 19.10.2012, 00:37 +0200 schrieb richard -rw- weinberger:
>>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Wei Yang
>>> wrote:
>
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
> In kfifo_in marco, one piece of code is arounded by if(0). This code in
> introduced by Stefani Seibold to suppress a compiler
> warning. This warning is not there with the upgrade of gcc version.
>
> This patch just remove this code.
Are you su
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2012, Adil Mujeeb wrote:
>
>> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:42:56 +0530
>> From: Adil Mujeeb
>> To: ty...@mit.edu, adilger.ker...@dilger.ca, linux-e...@vger.kernel.org,
>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Adil Mujeeb
>> Su
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
>>
>> Building um (uml) for x86_64 (defconfig) has lots of errors like:
>>
>> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:22:0,
>> from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:12,
>> from arch/um/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt
>
> All the headers but kvm_para.h use the Kbuild infrastructure to
> get to the asm-generic headers.
>
> (also had to add ipcbuf.h)
>
> Cc: linux-kbu...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: user-mode-linux-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 21:54:18 +1100 (EST)
> James Morris wrote:
>
>> Please pull these fixes for the TPM code.
>>
>> The following changes since commit 12250d843e8489ee00b5b7726da855e51694e792:
>>
>> Merge branch 'i2c-embedded/for-next' of
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> The new option is CONFIG_CC_DISABLE_AUTO_INLINE and it's
> located at:
> * Kernel hacking
> * Disable gcc automatic inlining
Can you guarantee that this will still produce a valid kernel?
AFAIK we have some functions which have to be
CC'in akpm.
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there some official maintainer who feels responsible for
> pushing the LZO update to Linus?
>
> Otherwise I also could issue a pull-request on github, but somehow I
> don't think that this is the preferre
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:15 PM, richard -rw- weinberger
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:04 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 09:44 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Sasha Levin
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>&
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:04 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 09:44 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> >
>> > Is anyone planning on picking up Linus' patch? This is still not in -next
>> > even.
>>
>> I was really hoping it wo
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> MAINTAINERS |6 +
> drivers/mtd/ubi/Kconfig | 20 ++
> drivers/mtd/ubi/Makefile|1 +
> drivers/mtd/ubi/attach.c| 386 +++-
> drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c | 70 +-
> dri
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Mark Jackson wrote:
> Apologies if this is the wrong place to post this query. Please feel free
> to redirect me to the correct place.
>
> I have come across a weird (but documented [1]) "feature" of mmap(), which
> is:-
>
> "The mmap()function adds an extra refer
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>> Just using futex is unfortunately not the answer either.
>
> Yes, postgress performs loads better with it's spinlocks, but due to
> that, it necessarily _hates_ preemption. How the is the scheduler
> supposed to know that any specific user
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
