From: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 08:19:42AM -0700
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 05:37:29PM +0800, Dave Young wrote:
> > Hi,
> > The kernel report warnings about sysfs filename duplicate under
> > rc8-mm1 and rc8-mm2.
> > 1.
> > cut
> > sysfs: duplicate filename 'usb
and post the *full* oops log (if it doesn't get logged to disk, you can
> try taking digicam photo, or write down *all* the messages and post here).
> I built an x86_64 kernel as per your .config, but don't see any memory
> dereference at nv_napi_poll+0x108 -- could be too
From: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, Sep 02, 2007 at 06:24:29AM +0530
>
> The dmesg you posted below doesn't cover the messages from this oops
> itself. As you mentioned you can reproduce this oops easily, please do so,
> and post the *full* oops log (if it doesn't get logged to disk
From: Paulo da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 02:07:15AM +0100
> This is a bug report. Any further information you may need, please let
> me know.
> Modules Loaded ndiswrapper
problem is, once you load ndiswrapper + the proprietary, closed source
windows drivers that
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:18:09AM -0700
>
> Yes, Neil had a whoops and a dud patch spent a day in mainline.
>
> Hopefully the below revert (from mainline) will fix it.
>
>
> Gitweb:
> http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 04:49:14PM +0200
>
> I used a working 2.6.21-rc3-mm2 tree, patched it up to 2.6.21-rc5-mm3
> and applied your patch. I ended up with the .config later in this email,
> and got this error:
>
> CC arch/x86_64/kernel/head6
From: Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 05:06:39PM +0530
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 01:17:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [..]
> > > + /*
> > > + * Make sure kernel is aligned to 2MB address. Catching it at compile
> > > + * time is better. Change your config file a
From: Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 01:11:59PM +0530
>
> How about attached patch?
>
> o X86_64 kernel should run from 2MB aligned address for two reasons.
> - Performance.
> - For relocatable kernels, page tables are updated based on difference
>
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 12:53:03AM -0700
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 09:12:20 +0200 Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A new error for me:
> >
> > loading 2.6.21rc5mm3
> > Bios data check successful
> > Destination address not 2M aligned
> > -- Sy
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 11:49:28PM -0800
>
LD init/built-in.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
fs/built-in.o: In function `load_elf_binary':
fs/binfmt_elf.c:978: undefined reference to `arch_setup_additional_pages'
make: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1
#
# Aut
From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, Jan 21, 2007 at 11:48:07AM -0500
>
> What about all of the changes with NAT? I see that it operates on
> level-3/network wise, I enabled that and backward compatiblity support as
> well, but when my iptables rules kick in, it says no such drive
From: Justin Piszcz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:03:42PM -0500
>
>
> My swap is on, 2GB ram and 2GB of swap on this machine. I can't go back
> to 2.6.17.13 as it does not recognize the NICs in my machine correctly and
> the Alsa Intel HD Audio driver has bugs etc, I guess
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:05:39AM -0800
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 12:00:12 +0100
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Okay, I have identified the patch that causes the problem to appear, which
> > is
> >
> > fix-sense-key-medium-error-pro
From: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 04:48:44PM -0500
> The "Re: Linux 2.6.20-rc1" sub-thread that had Jens and Alistair John
> Strachan replying seemed to implicate some core block layer badness.
>
The original problem (not mounting my raid6 partition) is observable i
From: Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:17:45AM -0500
>
> Remove an (incorrect) assertion that NOHIGHMEM is right for more
> users, since most systems are coming with at least 1G of memory these
> days, and even some laptops have up 4G of memory.
Given this (on a syst
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 09:00:01PM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> I ahve a PC box at hand, which ist containing 8 PCI slots.
> Four of them are sitting behind a PCI bridge.
> The error in the new kernel series is that during the
> PCI bus setup if a card is sitting behind the bridge, it
> will be
> Hi,
> Please tell me how to install a patch on linux kernel. I have
> downloaded a patch "kernel-patch-2_2_13-kdb_0_6-2.deb". How to install
> this patch? I am using a 2.2.14-12 kernel. Can I install the above
> patch.
>
You seem to ask a lot of questions starting with 'Please tell me how',
an
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 12:05:10PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> It _juuust_ so happens that I was tinkering... what do you think of
> something like the below? (and boy do I ever wonder what a certain
> box doing slrn stuff thinks of it.. hint hint;)
>
I'm sorry to say this box doesn't real
I'm running linux-2.4.5-ac15, and I can't seem to make clear to Linux that I'd
rather use less cache than use swap for my active program. I can't run a 100 Mb
program in 512 Mb memory without swapping parts of the active program?
I start a slrn (newsreader) session on a very big newsgroup; 15
On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 06:14:24AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> Then whatever sets up your ServerWorks ServerSet III LE chipset
> needs its PCI IRQ setup fixed ... I'm not sure how to do this.
>
> Perhaps someone who's familiar with arch/i386/kernel/pci-*.c
> irq setup can suggest the right pat
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 03:07:56AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I don't know, maybe it's Ok, but it looks confusing - usb-uhci is listed
> twice on the same IRQ 9.
>
My Abit VP6 (VIA694) says in dmesg:
usb.c: registered new driver hub
uhci.c: USB UHCI at I/O 0xa000, IRQ 19
usb.c: new
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 03:41:08AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > No, I'm afraid it doesn't :-(
> >
> Thanks for testing.
>
> Ok, how about this one? This is a more simple version of the logic
> presented, which should give you the value that Manfred asked you plug
> in manually.
>
No go, I'm a
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 04:42:40PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Does this patch fix things for you, such that MPS 1.1 and MPS 1.4 both
> work?
No, I'm afraid it doesn't :-(
Here are the dmesg (with some info cut out for brevity), the
/proc/interrupts and the lspci -vvvxxx from a 2.4.5-ac6 kernel
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 07:28:33PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > :setpci -s 00:07.2 INTERRUPT_LINE=15
> > :lspci -vx -s 00:07.2
> > 00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. UHCI USB (rev 16) (prog-if 00
>[UHCI])
> > Subsystem: Unknown device 0925:1
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:56:44AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Is the BIOS set to "Plug and Play supported OS" somewhere? If not, try
> enabling it.
>
It wasn't set, but with it set there is no difference.
Greetings,
Jurriaan
--
IF MICROSOFT BUILT CARS..
New seats would force everyone to have
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 05:04:50PM -0500, Jordan wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > I'm staying on 2.4.5-ac5 for whatever it's worth (putting my life on the
> > > line for the community? kidding...) and will report anything new. I will
> > > be on the lookout for later ac patches, 2.4.6 ... and h
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 01:20:23AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Looking at the diff of "lspci -vvvxxx" between MPS1.1 and MPS1.4 (on the
> same system) may be quite useful... maybe I missed the earlier "lspci
> -vvvxxx", but I only see one here...
Yep, I didn't want to keep sending long messages.
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:45:17PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > 00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. UHCI USB (rev 16) (prog-if 00
>[UHCI])
> > Subsystem: Unknown device 0925:1234
> > Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 5
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 10:21:55PM +0200, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> >
> > I know that with MPS 1.4, the USB controller finds itself at an
> > unshared interrupt 19. I can't reboot at the moment to check.
> >
> lspci -vxxx -s 00:07.0
>
> the APIC sits in the southbridge.
> the low 2 bits of offse
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 11:06:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 08:39:08PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What information would be necessary to debug this?
>
> Which kernel version?
>
> greg k-h
>
2.4.5-ac4, but I rebooted in 2.4.4 and it did the same.
I'll try and add
Hardware:
Abit VP6 (Via 694x) x86/SMP motherboard
with USB controller
If I set the bios for MPS 1.1, USB runs fine. If I set the bios
for MPS 1.4, I get this:
May 31 13:08:06 middle kernel: hub.c: USB new device connect on bus1/1, assigned
device number 4
May 31 13:08:09 middle kernel: usb_con
I got these messages in 2.4.4-ac5, and now in 2.4.4-ac6, when I expire
my news-spool. In 2.4.4, there's no problem expring my newsspool and
running 2 bonnie's in the background.
May 11 00:47:25 middle kernel: hdg: timeout waiting for DMA
May 11 00:47:25 middle kernel: ide_dmaproc: chipset support
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 02:37:53PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> 2.4.4-ac5
> >> o Fix DMA setup on hpt366/370 (Tim Hockin)
> >
> > I see definite changes; on heavy disk-access I got the following:
> >
> > hdg: timeout waiting for dma
> > ide_d
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 11:24:58PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
>
> Intermediate diffs are available from
>
> http://www.bzimage.org
>
> Please test this code **carefully** if using an HPT366/370 IDE
Should I be worried about these?
May 4 08:09:29 middle kernel: rtc: lost some interrupts at 256Hz.
May 4 08:09:38 middle last message repeated 2 times
May 4 08:09:56 middle kernel: rtc: lost some interrupts at 1024Hz.
May 4 08:10:05 middle kernel: [drm:mga_flush_ioctl] *ERROR* lock not held
M
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:13:46PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> I see you're using the alternate uhci driver... are hte results the same
> with the other UHCI driver?
I have read in the help-files that that was the one to use on this
VIA694 motherboard.
>
> Can you turn on usb mass storage verb
I cannot seem to mount my external USB host-powered 250 Mb zip-drive in
Linux-2.4.3-ac12. This is a freshly rebooted machine, rebooted with the
zip-drive attached and a zip-disk inside that Windows-2000 will read
without problems.
dmesg:
uhci.c: USB UHCI at I/O 0xc400, IRQ 7
usb.c: new USB bus re
This one is new - 2.4.3-ac12 built without problems.
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.3-ac14/drivers/net'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.3-ac14/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -m
preferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i686
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 06:19:31AM -0500, Andy Carlson wrote:
> time prime before x
> real1m23.535s
> user0m40.550s
> sys 0m42.980s
>
> /proc/mtrr before x
> reg00: base=0x ( 0MB), size= 256MB: write-back, count=1
> reg01: base=0xfd80 (4056MB), size= 4MB: write-combini
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 08:06:11PM -0500, Andy Carlson wrote:
> I was playing around with a program that I was using to time differences
> between kernels (a silly prime program that puts out 100 primes). I
> noticed a very strange behaviour. On a fresh boot, with the Penguin
> pictures that
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:55:46PM -0500, Jordan wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > J . A . Magallon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> > > > Can you back out the ide-cd changes Jens did and see if that fixes it ?
> > >
> > > Reverted the changes in ide-cd.[hc], and same result.
> >
> > You want t
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 09:28:44AM -0400, Chris Meadors wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Rafael E. Herrera wrote:
> > If the problem occurs whithout the frame buffer on, the problem seems to
> > be on the X server.
>
> Exactly. That is what I'm saying. I've seen the problem with the
> returning to
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 07:40:36AM -0700, James Simmons wrote:
>
> >If I use X on an accelerated, normal Matrox screen, my monitor complains
> >on exit:
> >
> >fH 49.4 KHz, fV 39.8 Hz
> >
> >(and it doesn't sync at 40 Hz vertical refresh :-( ).
> >
> >This is _half_ of the normal 80 Hz. Using fbs
On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 05:46:38PM +, J Brook wrote:
> > I have a similar problem with my G450, booting into the framebuffer,
> > then loading xdm and working in X, and then switching back to the
> > console. I may have another detail to add in that when I switch back
> > to the console from
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 09:19:17PM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote:
>
> On 03.12 Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
> >
>
> Silly idea: could you put the full path of the bz2 patch instead of only
> the dir ?
>
I have another idea: would it be pos
make -C arch/i386/lib modules_install
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.2-ac13/arch/i386/lib'
make[1]: Nothing to be done for `modules_install'.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.2-ac13/arch/i386/lib'
cd /lib/modules/2.4.2-ac13; \
mkdir -p pcmcia; \
find kernel -path '*
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 04:45:04PM +0100, Arjan Filius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried Erik's trigger-program.
>
> After some test i thing it's memory related, and it seems to match the
> other reports i saw on lkm.
> With my 384M ram i was not able te reproduce it.
> With "mem=32M" linux hang while
On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 11:19:49PM +0100, Erik Mouw wrote:
> I got them immediately at the first run, which more or less was what I
> expected because reiserfs ate one of my mailfolders that way (only a
> CVS log folder, so nothing special was lost). You have to remove the
> files between runs, ot
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 08:38:43AM -0500, TenThumbs wrote:
> When I am a) using modem ppp connection and b) downloading a file from a
> reasonably fast server so that the incoming connection is saturated,
> then attempting to open a new network tcp connection while this is going
> on fails quite r
>SMP machine, 2x P3/700 on an Abit VP6.
>Never any trouble with the earlier 2.2.19pre's.
>
>a strace shows the hang to be in the delete_module("hisax") call.
>
>I'm having trouble with the sysrq-key, but I hope this is enough since
>there were some changes w.r.t. modules/locking etc. in pre10.
>
I
SMP machine, 2x P3/700 on an Abit VP6.
Never any trouble with the earlier 2.2.19pre's.
a strace shows the hang to be in the delete_module("hisax") call.
I'm having trouble with the sysrq-key, but I hope this is enough since
there were some changes w.r.t. modules/locking etc. in pre10.
Good luck
This copies the sun 12x22 font to a 12x20 font.
Readability on a 21" monitor remains very high @ 1600x1200, but you get
60 lines instead of 55.
On request, a 2.2.x version is also available.
Jurriaan
--
For who are we to question her
Who stands among the stones
Big Country - The Seer
GN
Upon booting my shiny new Abit VP6 motherboard, I get:
... : IO APIC version: 0011
WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and here is the dmesg, followed by lspci -xx.
Hope it is of some use!
Greetings,
Jurriaan
Linux version 2.2.19pre3 (root@middle)
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 09:57:28AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > bug was discovered. Ever since, I have two boxes here
> > that keep falling over. Box A will randomly lock without
> > warning and box B will die and start printing this message
> > repeatedly on the screen until I physically hit re
for almost everything:
Dec 10 13:33:47 middle kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd...
Dec 10 13:33:50 middle kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for gdb...
Dec 10 13:33:50 middle last message repeated 9 times
Dec 10 13:33:57 middle kernel: VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for ksw
I know it crashes some via chipsets when autotuning (IIRC), but
if it were added behind CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL it couldn't do any
harm, could it?
I stuck between HPT370 support in 2.4.x but non-working isdn lzs
compression code and the reverse in 2.2.x. Just now I adapted Andre's
2.2.18-3 patch to
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 03:23:07PM -0400, Admin Mailing Lists wrote:
>
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
>
> >
> > Actually, the solution I think would be to use the MSDOS loader to boot
> > linux. I will look at grabbing the ELF code in Linux and loading Linux
> > from MSDOS -- if t
57 matches
Mail list logo
