Re: ***SPAM*** [PATCH 4.1 000/202] 4.1.11-stable review

2015-10-19 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/19/2015 08:28 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:14:12AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: Who added the "***SPAM***" prefix? Since it was present in Guenter's response without corresponding spam headers, I suspect it was added between vger and Gunter's mail server on you

Re: ***SPAM*** [PATCH 4.1 000/202] 4.1.11-stable review

2015-10-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:14:12AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Who added the "***SPAM***" prefix? Since it was present in Guenter's response without corresponding spam headers, I suspect it was added between vger and Gunter's mail server on your announce and that he responded with it. Will

Re: ***SPAM*** [PATCH 4.1 000/202] 4.1.11-stable review

2015-10-19 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
Who added the "***SPAM***" prefix? On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 09:12:13PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/17/2015 06:56 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.11 release. > >There are 202 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >

Re: ***SPAM*** [PATCH 4.1 000/202] 4.1.11-stable review

2015-10-18 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/17/2015 06:56 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.11 release. There are 202 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Responses should be m