On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:35:34PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
[]
> there's a difference between NACKing my changes because the patch
> breaks things versus because you think the whole system should be
> taking some other form.
After all, i was giving negative acknowledgement to only-good-branch
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:28:03AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >proposition is to substitute:
> > "$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE)"
> >with
> > "mkimage"
>
> this isnt a one-to-one change
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:28:03AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >proposition is to substitute:
> > "$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE)"
> >with
> > "mkimage"
>
> this isnt a one-to-one change ... let's look at the typical
> mkimage-missing
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 05:38:28PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
>
> > BTW, Debian shell policy is to be bashizms-clear. Purpose -- to have
> > compatibility with any `sh'. Shall we?
>
> Wrong.
>
>
Hi,
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
> BTW, Debian shell policy is to be bashizms-clear. Purpose -- to have
> compatibility with any `sh'. Shall we?
Wrong.
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-scripts
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
proposition is to substitute:
"$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE)"
with
"mkimage"
this isnt a one-to-one change ... let's look at the typical
mkimage-missing scenario ...
with mkuboot.sh you'd get output like:
...
UIMAGE
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel.commits.mm
> Subject: + search-a-little-harder-for-mkimage.patch added to -mm tree
> Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:07:38 -0800
[]
> --
> Subject: search a little harder
On Feb 8 2007 07:43, Oleg Verych wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > If that matter, `type -path' is bashizm (BloAted SHell), and "blackbox"
>> >> > with "dash" (very good `sh' equivalents) will fail.
>> >>
>> >> Does the kernel presently build with that shell?
>> >
>> >build - yes, with dash being `$(shell)'.
On Feb 8 2007 07:43, Oleg Verych wrote:
If that matter, `type -path' is bashizm (BloAted SHell), and blackbox
with dash (very good `sh' equivalents) will fail.
Does the kernel presently build with that shell?
build - yes, with dash being `$(shell)'. All scripts with `#!/bin/bash'
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.kernel.commits.mm
Subject: + search-a-little-harder-for-mkimage.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:07:38 -0800
[]
--
Subject: search a little harder for mkimage
From: Mike
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
proposition is to substitute:
$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE)
with
mkimage
this isnt a one-to-one change ... let's look at the typical
mkimage-missing scenario ...
with mkuboot.sh you'd get output like:
...
UIMAGE
Hi,
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
BTW, Debian shell policy is to be bashizms-clear. Purpose -- to have
compatibility with any `sh'. Shall we?
Wrong.
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-scripts
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 05:38:28PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
BTW, Debian shell policy is to be bashizms-clear. Purpose -- to have
compatibility with any `sh'. Shall we?
Wrong.
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:28:03AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
proposition is to substitute:
$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE)
with
mkimage
this isnt a one-to-one change ... let's look at the typical
mkimage-missing scenario ...
You are
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:28:03AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
proposition is to substitute:
$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE)
with
mkimage
this isnt a one-to-one change ... let's look at
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 03:35:34PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
[]
there's a difference between NACKing my changes because the patch
breaks things versus because you think the whole system should be
taking some other form.
After all, i was giving negative acknowledgement to only-good-branch
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:40:28AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
[]
> by this argument, why does mkuboot.sh exist at all then ? let's
> simply delete mkuboot.sh and change all arch Makefile's like so:
> -$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE) ...
> +-mkimage ...
Yes (with TOOLCHAIN prefix).
> i of
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:56:17AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Check to see if `${CROSS_COMPILE}mkimage` exists and if not, fall back to
> >> the standard `mkimage`
> >
> >Why this can't
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:56:17AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Check to see if `${CROSS_COMPILE}mkimage` exists and if not, fall back to
> >> the standard `mkimage`
> >
> >Why this can't be done by
> >
> > PATH=$CROSS_COMPILE:$PATH
> >
>
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:58:26AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Trivial shell scripts, especially for embedded archs (Blackfin is
> >one, IIRC), may be easily converted.
>
> yes, but Blackfin
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:58:26AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:19:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 06:24:40 +0100 Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > If that matter, `type
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:19:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 06:24:40 +0100 Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If that matter, `type -path' is bashizm (BloAted SHell), and "blackbox"
> > with "dash" (very good
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:19:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 06:24:40 +0100 Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If that matter, `type -path' is bashizm (BloAted SHell), and "blackbox"
> > with "dash" (very good `sh' equivalents) will fail.
>
> Does the kernel
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:19:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 06:24:40 +0100 Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If that matter, `type -path' is bashizm (BloAted SHell), and blackbox
with dash (very good `sh' equivalents) will fail.
Does the kernel presently build
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:19:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 06:24:40 +0100 Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If that matter, `type -path' is bashizm (BloAted SHell), and blackbox
with dash (very good `sh' equivalents)
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:58:26AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:19:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 06:24:40 +0100 Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If that matter, `type -path' is bashizm
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:58:26AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trivial shell scripts, especially for embedded archs (Blackfin is
one, IIRC), may be easily converted.
yes, but Blackfin is no-mmu
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:56:17AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check to see if `${CROSS_COMPILE}mkimage` exists and if not, fall back to
the standard `mkimage`
Why this can't be done by
PATH=$CROSS_COMPILE:$PATH
in your environment?
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 12:56:17AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 2/8/07, Oleg Verych [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check to see if `${CROSS_COMPILE}mkimage` exists and if not, fall back to
the standard `mkimage`
Why this can't be done by
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 02:40:28AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
[]
by this argument, why does mkuboot.sh exist at all then ? let's
simply delete mkuboot.sh and change all arch Makefile's like so:
-$(CONFIG_SHELL) $(MKIMAGE) ...
+-mkimage ...
Yes (with TOOLCHAIN prefix).
i of
30 matches
Mail list logo
