Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:32:10PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> (No patch at this time, -- just asking about an.. idea ;)
>
> Let's see what such a patch looks like to see if it would be workable or
> not.
Umm.. it's definitely workable, and even almost trivial.
Just
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:32:10PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
> (No patch at this time, -- just asking about an.. idea ;)
Let's see what such a patch looks like to see if it would be workable or
not.
And no one forces you to use udev, I have machines with a static /dev
that work just fine
Not-so-recently already, device directories in /sys started providing
files like modalias, which corresponds to $MODALIAS env. variable at
uevent time. Also not-so-recently, uevent file appeared, which, when
written, triggers re-execution of an uevent corresponding to the
device. So far so good.
Not-so-recently already, device directories in /sys started providing
files like modalias, which corresponds to $MODALIAS env. variable at
uevent time. Also not-so-recently, uevent file appeared, which, when
written, triggers re-execution of an uevent corresponding to the
device. So far so good.
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:32:10PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
(No patch at this time, -- just asking about an.. idea ;)
Let's see what such a patch looks like to see if it would be workable or
not.
And no one forces you to use udev, I have machines with a static /dev
that work just fine :)
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:32:10PM +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote:
(No patch at this time, -- just asking about an.. idea ;)
Let's see what such a patch looks like to see if it would be workable or
not.
Umm.. it's definitely workable, and even almost trivial.
Just splitting
6 matches
Mail list logo
