>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 5:06 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I believe you have _way_ too many config variables. If this can be set
> at runtime, does it need a config option, too?
Generally speaking, I think until this algorithm has an adapti
On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 23:06 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2008-02-25 11:01:08, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > From: Sven Dietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Why is this good idea?
>
The timeout is useful to eliminate excessive CPU utilization when
waiting for long-held critical sections.
The p
On Mon 2008-02-25 14:19:47, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:06:01PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2008-02-25 11:01:08, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > > From: Sven Dietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Why is this good idea?
>
> It preserves the original author when the patch is app
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:06:01PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2008-02-25 11:01:08, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > From: Sven Dietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Why is this good idea?
It preserves the original author when the patch is applied by git.
Otherwise the author of the email would be c
On Mon 2008-02-25 11:01:08, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> From: Sven Dietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Why is this good idea?
> Signed-off-by: Sven Dietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> +config RTLOCK_DELAY
> + int "Default delay (in loops) for adaptive rtlocks"
> + range 0 10
> + d
From: Sven Dietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Sven Dietrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
kernel/Kconfig.preempt| 11 +++
kernel/rtmutex.c |4
kernel/rtmutex_adaptive.h | 11 +--
kernel/sysctl.c | 12
4 files changed, 36 inser
6 matches
Mail list logo
