On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 03:22:29PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:55 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:25:46PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:38 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0800,
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:55 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:25:46PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:38 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > > > Hi Greg,
> > > >
> > > > While playing with
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 08:42 -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
>
> I can add remove link before unregister() as you suggested.
>
> Regarding accessing kobject after freeing up, no one calls with
> "root".
> Why not clean it up first, like this ?
>
> Dave, are you okay with this ?
Yeah, I don't
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 21:41 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:08:42PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:55 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:25:46PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:38 -0800, Greg
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 03:22:29PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:55 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:25:46PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:38 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0800, Badari
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 21:41 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:08:42PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:55 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:25:46PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:38 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 08:42 -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
I can add remove link before unregister() as you suggested.
Regarding accessing kobject after freeing up, no one calls with
root.
Why not clean it up first, like this ?
Dave, are you okay with this ?
Yeah, I don't see any
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:55 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:25:46PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:38 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Hi Greg,
While playing with hotplug memory
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:08:42PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:55 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:25:46PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:38 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0800,
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:55 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:25:46PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:38 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > > > Hi Greg,
> > > >
> > > > While playing with
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:25:46PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:38 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > While playing with hotplug memory remove on 2.6.24-mm1, I
> > > noticed that
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:38 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > While playing with hotplug memory remove on 2.6.24-mm1, I
> > noticed that /sysfs directory entries are not getting removed.
> >
> > sysdev_unregister()
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> While playing with hotplug memory remove on 2.6.24-mm1, I
> noticed that /sysfs directory entries are not getting removed.
>
> sysdev_unregister() used to call kobject_unregister().
> But in 2.6.24-mm1, its only
Hi Greg,
While playing with hotplug memory remove on 2.6.24-mm1, I
noticed that /sysfs directory entries are not getting removed.
sysdev_unregister() used to call kobject_unregister().
But in 2.6.24-mm1, its only dropping the ref. It should
call kobject_del() to remove the object. Correct ?
Hi Greg,
While playing with hotplug memory remove on 2.6.24-mm1, I
noticed that /sysfs directory entries are not getting removed.
sysdev_unregister() used to call kobject_unregister().
But in 2.6.24-mm1, its only dropping the ref. It should
call kobject_del() to remove the object. Correct ?
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Hi Greg,
While playing with hotplug memory remove on 2.6.24-mm1, I
noticed that /sysfs directory entries are not getting removed.
sysdev_unregister() used to call kobject_unregister().
But in 2.6.24-mm1, its only dropping
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:38 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Hi Greg,
While playing with hotplug memory remove on 2.6.24-mm1, I
noticed that /sysfs directory entries are not getting removed.
sysdev_unregister() used to call
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:25:46PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:38 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Hi Greg,
While playing with hotplug memory remove on 2.6.24-mm1, I
noticed that /sysfs directory
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:55 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:25:46PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:38 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
Hi Greg,
While playing with hotplug memory
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 09:08:42PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:55 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:25:46PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 16:38 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:56:58PM -0800, Badari
20 matches
Mail list logo