On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Robert Love wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:28 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > > > The below patch against 2.6.13-rc1-mm1 fixes the umount hangs caused by
> > > > inotif
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Robert Love wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:28 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > > The below patch against 2.6.13-rc1-mm1 fixes the umount hangs caused by
> > > inotify.
> >
> > Thank you, very much, Anton, for hacking on
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Robert Love wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:28 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > The below patch against 2.6.13-rc1-mm1 fixes the umount hangs caused by
> > inotify.
>
> Thank you, very much, Anton, for hacking on this over the weekend.
You are welcome. (-:
> It's defi
On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 20:28 +0100, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> The below patch against 2.6.13-rc1-mm1 fixes the umount hangs caused by
> inotify.
Thank you, very much, Anton, for hacking on this over the weekend.
It's definitely not the prettiest thing, but there may be no easier
approach. One
Hi Andrew, Robert,
The below patch against 2.6.13-rc1-mm1 fixes the umount hangs caused by
inotify.
It excludes more inodes from being messed around with in
inotify_unmount_inodes(): the ones with zero i_count as they cannot have
any watches and the I_WILL_FREE ones which it is not allowed to
5 matches
Mail list logo