On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 07:43 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:45:02AM -0200, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:07:11PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Howdy Greg,
> > > >
> > > > Somehow the following patch is missing for this series
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:45:02AM -0200, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:07:11PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > >
> > > Howdy Greg,
> > >
> > > Somehow the following patch is missing for this series submission:
> > > > Len Brown
> > > > x86: Remove the ancient and
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:07:11PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >
> > Howdy Greg,
> >
> > Somehow the following patch is missing for this series submission:
> > > Len Brown
> > > x86: Remove the ancient and deprecated disable_hlt() and enable_hlt()
> > > facility
> >
> > I glanced
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:07:11PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Howdy Greg,
Somehow the following patch is missing for this series submission:
Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
x86: Remove the ancient and deprecated disable_hlt() and enable_hlt()
facility
I glanced at
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:45:02AM -0200, Rafael Aquini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:07:11PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Howdy Greg,
Somehow the following patch is missing for this series submission:
Len Brown len.br...@intel.com
x86: Remove the ancient and
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 07:43 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:45:02AM -0200, Rafael Aquini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 09:07:11PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
Howdy Greg,
Somehow the following patch is missing for this series submission:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:31:10PM -0200, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:06:04AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.51 release.
> > There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:06:04AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.51 release.
> There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.51 release.
There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun Nov 4 17:03:28 UTC 2012.
Anything
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.51 release.
There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Sun Nov 4 17:03:28 UTC 2012.
Anything
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:06:04AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.51 release.
There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:31:10PM -0200, Rafael Aquini wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 10:06:04AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.51 release.
There are 4 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If
12 matches
Mail list logo
