On 08/01/2013 07:35 AM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
Hi Guenter,
Sorry, I am way behind on this...
No problem. Happens to me too.
and so on. Not that it tells me anything. I'd guess I have the wrong compiler,
but it does
build for 3.9, so maybe not. If you have an insight, please let me know.
Yes,
Hi Guenter,
Sorry, I am way behind on this...
On 27/06/13 09:29, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:06:11AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
On 26/06/13 17:34, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:32:26PM +0200, Ge
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:06:11AM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
> On 26/06/13 17:34, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:32:26PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >>>Hi Günther,
> >>>
> >>>On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:23 PM,
On 26/06/13 17:34, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:32:26PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Günther,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Build m68k:defconfig passed
Build m68k:apollo_defconfig pa
On 06/25/2013 04:00 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.84 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses sho
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:34:42AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:32:26PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> Hi Günther,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> > Build m68k:de
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:32:26PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Günther,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> > Build m68k:defconfig passed
>> > Build m68k:apollo_defconfig passed
>> > Build m68k:m5272c3_d
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:23:00PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:39:15AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.84 release.
> > There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. I
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 09:32:26PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Günther,
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Build m68k:defconfig passed
> > Build m68k:apollo_defconfig passed
> > Build m68k:m5272c3_defconfig failed
> > Build m68k:m5307c3_defconfig failed
> > Bu
Hi Günther,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Build m68k:defconfig passed
> Build m68k:apollo_defconfig passed
> Build m68k:m5272c3_defconfig failed
> Build m68k:m5307c3_defconfig failed
> Build m68k:m5249evb_defconfig failed
> Build m68k:m5407c3_defconfig failed
> Build m68
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:39:15AM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.84 release.
> There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.0.84 release.
There are 17 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jun 27 18:35:59 UTC 2013.
Anything receive
12 matches
Mail list logo
