On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:52:00PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:57:45 -0700 Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:51:04AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 13:34 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > 3.0-stable review patch. If
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:57:45 -0700 Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:51:04AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 13:34 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > 3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > know.
> > >
> > >
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 12:51:04AM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 13:34 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: NeilBrown
> >
> > commit 6dafab6b1383e912cd252fa
On Fri, 2012-09-28 at 13:34 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> 3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: NeilBrown
>
> commit 6dafab6b1383e912cd252fa809570b484eb6e0dc upstream.
[...]
> This is suitable for -stable as out-of-data
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: NeilBrown
commit 6dafab6b1383e912cd252fa809570b484eb6e0dc upstream.
It isn't always necessary to update the metadata when spares are
removed as the presence-or-not of a spare isn't really impor
5 matches
Mail list logo