On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 16:49 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings
> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:47:06 +0100
>
> > I built on x86_64...
>
> As did I :-)
>
> > But it's not an important bug in mainline (yet) so perhaps we can treat
> > it as only required in stable.
>
> I think this is
From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:47:06 +0100
> I built on x86_64...
As did I :-)
> But it's not an important bug in mainline (yet) so perhaps we can treat
> it as only required in stable.
I think this is the best thing to do for now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 20:39 -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 03:31:51PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: Eric Dumazet
> >
> > [ Upstream commit
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 03:31:51PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Eric Dumazet
>
> [ Upstream commit 16b0dc29c1af9df341428f4c49ada4f626258082 ]
>
> Trying to "modprobe dummy
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Dumazet
[ Upstream commit 16b0dc29c1af9df341428f4c49ada4f626258082 ]
Trying to "modprobe dummy numdummies=3" triggers :
INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 8} (t=6
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com
[ Upstream commit 16b0dc29c1af9df341428f4c49ada4f626258082 ]
Trying to modprobe dummy numdummies=3 triggers :
INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU {
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 03:31:51PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com
[ Upstream commit 16b0dc29c1af9df341428f4c49ada4f626258082 ]
Trying to modprobe dummy
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 20:39 -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 03:31:51PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com
[ Upstream
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:47:06 +0100
I built on x86_64...
As did I :-)
But it's not an important bug in mainline (yet) so perhaps we can treat
it as only required in stable.
I think this is the best thing to do for now.
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 16:49 -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:47:06 +0100
I built on x86_64...
As did I :-)
But it's not an important bug in mainline (yet) so perhaps we can treat
it as only required in stable.
I think
10 matches
Mail list logo