Re: [ 35/48] dummy: fix rcu_sched self-detected stalls

2012-07-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 16:49 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Ben Hutchings > Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:47:06 +0100 > > > I built on x86_64... > > As did I :-) > > > But it's not an important bug in mainline (yet) so perhaps we can treat > > it as only required in stable. > > I think this is

Re: [ 35/48] dummy: fix rcu_sched self-detected stalls

2012-07-09 Thread David Miller
From: Ben Hutchings Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:47:06 +0100 > I built on x86_64... As did I :-) > But it's not an important bug in mainline (yet) so perhaps we can treat > it as only required in stable. I think this is the best thing to do for now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [ 35/48] dummy: fix rcu_sched self-detected stalls

2012-07-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 20:39 -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 03:31:51PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > -- > > > > From: Eric Dumazet > > > > [ Upstream commit

Re: [ 35/48] dummy: fix rcu_sched self-detected stalls

2012-07-09 Thread Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 03:31:51PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Eric Dumazet > > [ Upstream commit 16b0dc29c1af9df341428f4c49ada4f626258082 ] > > Trying to "modprobe dummy

[ 35/48] dummy: fix rcu_sched self-detected stalls

2012-07-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Eric Dumazet [ Upstream commit 16b0dc29c1af9df341428f4c49ada4f626258082 ] Trying to "modprobe dummy numdummies=3" triggers : INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 8} (t=6

[ 35/48] dummy: fix rcu_sched self-detected stalls

2012-07-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com [ Upstream commit 16b0dc29c1af9df341428f4c49ada4f626258082 ] Trying to modprobe dummy numdummies=3 triggers : INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU {

Re: [ 35/48] dummy: fix rcu_sched self-detected stalls

2012-07-09 Thread Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 03:31:51PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com [ Upstream commit 16b0dc29c1af9df341428f4c49ada4f626258082 ] Trying to modprobe dummy

Re: [ 35/48] dummy: fix rcu_sched self-detected stalls

2012-07-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 20:39 -0300, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski wrote: On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 03:31:51PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Eric Dumazet eduma...@google.com [ Upstream

Re: [ 35/48] dummy: fix rcu_sched self-detected stalls

2012-07-09 Thread David Miller
From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:47:06 +0100 I built on x86_64... As did I :-) But it's not an important bug in mainline (yet) so perhaps we can treat it as only required in stable. I think this is the best thing to do for now. -- To unsubscribe from this

Re: [ 35/48] dummy: fix rcu_sched self-detected stalls

2012-07-09 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 16:49 -0700, David Miller wrote: From: Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:47:06 +0100 I built on x86_64... As did I :-) But it's not an important bug in mainline (yet) so perhaps we can treat it as only required in stable. I think