Greg KH wrote:
For the JSM driver, its up to you whether you feel its needed or not.
However, I would like to mention that the DIGI drivers that currently
reside in the kernel sources *do* reserve that ioctl space,
and is acknowledged by "Documentation/ioctl-number.txt":
d' F0-FF linu
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:35:41PM -0600, Kilau, Scott wrote:
As it stands today, your requirement appears to be that she needs
to yank all diags ioctls and sysfs files before the driver can make
it into the kernel sources.
Not all sysfs files, sysfs files are fine, as long a
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 01:35:41PM -0600, Kilau, Scott wrote:
> As it stands today, your requirement appears to be that she needs
> to yank all diags ioctls and sysfs files before the driver can make
> it into the kernel sources.
Not all sysfs files, sysfs files are fine, as long as they are
imple
> > DPA support is a requirement for all Digi drivers, so it would
> > not be possible for me to remove them from my "dgnc" version
> > of the driver.
> "requirement" from whom and to who? The Linux kernel community?
>From our customers who are moving from other OS's to Linux,
and expect DPA su
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 11:42:31AM -0600, Kilau, Scott wrote:
> Hi Wendy, Greg, all,
>
> If IBM intends on our DPA management program to work for the JSM
> products, the ioctls are needed.
Wendy, what is IBM's stance on this?
> DPA support is a requirement for all Digi drivers, so it would
> not
sday, March 09, 2005 11:32 AM
To: Greg KH
Cc: Kilau, Scott; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ patch 6/7] drivers/serial/jsm: new serial device driver
Greg KH wrote:
>On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:50:04AM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
>
>
>>+/* Ioctls needed for dp
Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:50:04AM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
+/* Ioctls needed for dpa operation */
+#define DIGI_GETDD ('d'<<8) | 248 /* get driver info */
+#define DIGI_GETBD ('d'<<8) | 249 /* get board info */
+#define DIGI_GET_NI_INFO ('d'<<8) | 250 /* nonintellige
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 10:50:04AM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
> +/* Ioctls needed for dpa operation */
> +#define DIGI_GETDD ('d'<<8) | 248 /* get driver info */
> +#define DIGI_GETBD ('d'<<8) | 249 /* get board info */
> +#define DIGI_GET_NI_INFO ('d'<<8) | 250
Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:42:31PM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
The following email I got from Scott Kilau in digi:
Scott Kilau wrote:
The DPA program is very old, and is shared among other drivers
and OS's,
so changing the code to read the sysfs instead of doing ioctls
i
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:42:31PM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
> The following email I got from Scott Kilau in digi:
> Scott Kilau wrote:
>
>The DPA program is very old, and is shared among other drivers
> and OS's,
>so changing the code to read the sysfs instead of doing ioctls
> is
Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 05:48:56PM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
Since some tools in Digi company need these new ioctls to access device
driver. I still keep these new ioctls.
What tools? What are they used for? Why do they need them? Why can't
they just use the sysfs files?
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 05:48:56PM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
> Since some tools in Digi company need these new ioctls to access device
> driver. I still keep these new ioctls.
What tools? What are they used for? Why do they need them? Why can't
they just use the sysfs files?
As the driver isn
Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:08:44PM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
+/
+ * Structure used with ioctl commands for DIGI parameters.
+ /
+struct dig
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 04:08:44PM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
> +/
> + * Structure used with ioctl commands for DIGI parameters.
> + /
> +struct digi_t {
> +
Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 06:40:20PM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
diff -Nuar linux-2.6.9.orig/drivers/serial/jsm/digi.h linux-2.6.9.new/drivers/serial/jsm/digi.h
Oh, and please diff against at least the latest kernel release, 2.6.9 is
old...
+ * $Id: digi.h,v 1.7 2004/09/23 16:08
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 06:40:20PM -0500, Wen Xiong wrote:
>
> diff -Nuar linux-2.6.9.orig/drivers/serial/jsm/digi.h
> linux-2.6.9.new/drivers/serial/jsm/digi.h
Oh, and please diff against at least the latest kernel release, 2.6.9 is
old...
> + * $Id: digi.h,v 1.7 2004/09/23 16:08:30 scottk Ex
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 07:47:58PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >+struct shrink_buf_struct {
> >+unsigned intshrink_buf_vaddr; /* Virtual address of board
> >*/
> >+unsigned intshrink_buf_phys;/* Physical address of board
> >*/
>
> Major bug. These should be unsigne
> diff -Nuar linux-2.6.9.orig/drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_driver.h
> linux-2.6.9.new/drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_driver.h
> --- linux-2.6.9.orig/drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_driver.h1969-12-31
> 18:00:00.0 -0600
> +++ linux-2.6.9.new/drivers/serial/jsm/jsm_driver.h 2005-02-27
> 17:14:44.74795201
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Wen Xiong wrote:
This patch is all headers for this device driver.
Signed-off-by: Wen Xiong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+++ linux-2.6.9.new/drivers/serial/jsm/digi.h 2005-02-27
17:14:44.746952168 -0600
@@ -0,0 +1,416 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2003 Digi International (www.digi.com)
+ *
Wen Xiong wrote:
+struct rw_t {
+ unsigned char rw_req; /* Request type */
+ unsigned char rw_board; /* Host Adapter board number*/
+ unsigned char rw_conc;/* Concentrator number */
+ unsigned char rw_reserved;/*
This patch is all headers for this device driver.
Signed-off-by: Wen Xiong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -Nuar linux-2.6.9.orig/drivers/serial/jsm/digi.h
linux-2.6.9.new/drivers/serial/jsm/digi.h
--- linux-2.6.9.orig/drivers/serial/jsm/digi.h 1969-12-31 18:00:00.0
-0600
+++ linux-2.6.9.new/dr
21 matches
Mail list logo
