On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> by mixing large order pages into the regular lru, page aging gets rather
> unfair.
Not in general, only for particular loads. On average this is okay. It is
consistent to age the whole block and not just a part of it.
-
To unsubscribe from this lis
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 12:05 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Todo/Issues:
- reclaim
by mixing large order pages into the regular lru, page aging gets rather
unfair.
One possible solution to this is address_space based reclaim, something
which might also be beneficial for containers.
-
To un
Thanks to some help Mingming Cao we now have support for extX with up to
64k blocksize. There were several issues in the jbd layer (The ext2
patch that Christoph complained about was dropped).
The patchset can be tested (assuming one has a current git tree)
git checkout -b largeblock
git pu
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> one patch per file is the most braindead and most unacceptable way
> to split a series. Please stop whatever you're doing right now and
> correct it and send out a patch that has one patch per logical change
> for the whole tree. This means people
Stoopp!
This patchseries is entirely unacceptable!
one patch per file is the most braindead and most unacceptable way
to split a series. Please stop whatever you're doing right now and
correct it and send out a patch that has one patch per logical change
for the whole tree. This means peopl
[An update before the Kernel Summit because of the numerous requests that I
have had for this patchset. Please speak up if you feel that we need something
like this.]
This patchset modifies the Linux kernel so that larger block sizes than
page size can be supported. Larger block sizes are handled
6 matches
Mail list logo
