Re: [000/121] 3.2.51-rc1 review

2013-10-20 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/20/2013 11:05 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 09:23 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 10/20/2013 04:56 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 09:52 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 09/08/2013 01:18 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Guenter R

Re: [000/121] 3.2.51-rc1 review

2013-10-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2013-10-20 at 09:23 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/20/2013 04:56 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 09:52 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> On 09/08/2013 01:18 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >>> On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > m68k-linux-ld:

Re: [000/121] 3.2.51-rc1 review

2013-10-20 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 10/20/2013 04:56 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 09:52 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: On 09/08/2013 01:18 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: m68k-linux-ld: error: no memory region specified for loadable section `.note.gnu.build-id

Re: [000/121] 3.2.51-rc1 review

2013-10-20 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 09:52 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 09/08/2013 01:18 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> m68k-linux-ld: error: no memory region specified for loadable section > >> `.note.gnu.build-id' > > > > I can't seem to find an

Re: [000/121] 3.2.51-rc1 review

2013-09-09 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 09/09/2013 06:16 AM, Greg Ungerer wrote: On 08/09/13 18:18, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: m68k-linux-ld: error: no memory region specified for loadable section `.note.gnu.build-id' I can't seem to find an explicit fix for that since v3.2. P

Re: [000/121] 3.2.51-rc1 review

2013-09-09 Thread Greg Ungerer
On 08/09/13 18:18, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: m68k-linux-ld: error: no memory region specified for loadable section `.note.gnu.build-id' I can't seem to find an explicit fix for that since v3.2. Perhaps the fix is a side effect of f84f52a5c1

Re: [000/121] 3.2.51-rc1 review

2013-09-08 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 09/08/2013 01:18 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: m68k-linux-ld: error: no memory region specified for loadable section `.note.gnu.build-id' I can't seem to find an explicit fix for that since v3.2. Perhaps the fix is a side effect of f84f5

Re: [000/121] 3.2.51-rc1 review

2013-09-08 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > m68k-linux-ld: error: no memory region specified for loadable section > `.note.gnu.build-id' I can't seem to find an explicit fix for that since v3.2. Perhaps the fix is a side effect of f84f52a5c15db7d14a534815f27253b001735183 ("m68knommu: c

Re: [000/121] 3.2.51-rc1 review

2013-09-08 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 09/07/2013 07:52 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.51 release. There are 121 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Thanks to Guenter Roeck,

[000/121] 3.2.51-rc1 review

2013-09-07 Thread Ben Hutchings
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.51 release. There are 121 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know. Thanks to Guenter Roeck, I've been able to build-test this on a large nu