Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-22 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 22/06/07, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:39:50 +0300 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have patches for "very high non-preempt latency in > > context_struct_compute_av()" and "list_add corruption. prev->next > > should be next (f7d28794), but

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That would be a bit like waiting for a Debian release and never happen. Ok, but Debian seems to be stable and sometimes their teem make releases =). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-22 Thread Alan Cox
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:39:50 +0300 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have patches for "very high non-preempt latency in > > context_struct_compute_av()" and "list_add corruption. prev->next > > should be next (f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug > > at

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have patches for "very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av()" and "list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33", but both are too intrusive. Anyway, those bugs are not regressions. Are you

[1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello! I'm a newbuy in kernel development. Now I'm just trying to find out what is going in it =). I noticed this: (BTW. There is a new category called "Will be fixed in 2.6.23") Is it really important to release 2.6.22 as soon as possible? I think kernel should be 99% stable. Why not to wait

[1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello! I'm a newbuy in kernel development. Now I'm just trying to find out what is going in it =). I noticed this: (BTW. There is a new category called Will be fixed in 2.6.23) Is it really important to release 2.6.22 as soon as possible? I think kernel should be 99% stable. Why not to wait

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-22 Thread Alan Cox
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:39:50 +0300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have patches for very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av() and list_add corruption. prev-next should be next (f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33,

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We have patches for very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av() and list_add corruption. prev-next should be next (f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4 (prev=f0df8ed4) Kernel Bug at lib/list_debug.c:33, but both are too intrusive. Anyway, those bugs are not regressions. Are you going

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-22 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That would be a bit like waiting for a Debian release and never happen. Ok, offtopbut Debian seems to be stable and sometimes their teem make releases =)./offtop - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-22 Thread Michal Piotrowski
On 22/06/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:39:50 +0300 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have patches for very high non-preempt latency in context_struct_compute_av() and list_add corruption. prev-next should be next (f7d28794), but was f0df8ed4

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-21 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Linus Torvalds pisze: On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Subject: long freezes on thinkpad t60 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/24/100 Submitter : Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Handled-By : Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Patch :

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-21 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Subject: long freezes on thinkpad t60 > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/24/100 > Submitter : Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Handled-By : Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/16/81 >

[1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-21 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc5 with patches available. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions (BTW. There is a new category called "Will be fixed in 2.6.23") Unclassified Subject: Device hang when

[1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-21 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc5 with patches available. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions (BTW. There is a new category called Will be fixed in 2.6.23) Unclassified Subject: Device hang when

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-21 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Subject: long freezes on thinkpad t60 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/24/100 Submitter : Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handled-By : Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/16/81 Status :

Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc5: known regressions with patches v2

2007-06-21 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Linus Torvalds pisze: On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote: Subject: long freezes on thinkpad t60 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/24/100 Submitter : Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Handled-By : Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/16/81