On 26/09/2019 20:52:38+0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Does this feedback indicate also an agreement for the detail
> >> if the mapping of internal phy registers would be a required operation?
> >> (Would such a resource allocation eventually be optional?)
> >
> > It is optional.
>
> Would you
>> Does this feedback indicate also an agreement for the detail
>> if the mapping of internal phy registers would be a required operation?
>> (Would such a resource allocation eventually be optional?)
>
> It is optional.
Would you like to integrate an other patch variant then?
Regards,
Markus
On 26/09/2019 17:29:02+0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Simplify this function implementation by using a known wrapper function.
> …
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn
>
> Does this feedback indicate also an agreement for the detail
> if the mapping of internal phy registers would be a required
>> Simplify this function implementation by using a known wrapper function.
…
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn
Does this feedback indicate also an agreement for the detail
if the mapping of internal phy registers would be a required operation?
(Would such a resource allocation eventually be optional?)
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:02:40PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 20:20:34 +0200
>
> Simplify this function implementation by using a known wrapper function.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 20:20:34 +0200
Simplify this function implementation by using a known wrapper function.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring
---
drivers/net/phy/mdio-mscc-miim.c | 18 +-
1 file
6 matches
Mail list logo