Re: [1/3] 2.6.22-rc3: known regressions v2

2007-06-05 Thread James Bottomley
On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 16:13 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 14:20:44 +0200 Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc3. > > > > Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. > > http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regress

Re: [1/3] 2.6.22-rc3: known regressions v2

2007-06-02 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 14:20:44 +0200 Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi all, > > Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc3. > > Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. > http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions > > > Unclassified > > Subject: build failed in function `v

Re: [1/3] 2.6.22-rc3: known regressions v2

2007-06-01 Thread Miklos Szeredi
> i have no better ideas that what you already tried - but unfortunately > the tracer makes the bug go away and the NMI watchdog crashes your box. > Btw., nmi_watchdog=2 might have a higher chance of surviving (it can > still lock up a T60 but with a lower likelyhood). Good tip, nmi_watchdog=2

Re: [1/3] 2.6.22-rc3: known regressions v2

2007-06-01 Thread Jeff Chua
On 6/2/07, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The fix is in -mm and sent to Andi. So it will likely be merged soon. I recommemd to ignore the warnings for now. Thanks, I'll check when the next rc4 is ready. Jeff. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"

Re: [1/3] 2.6.22-rc3: known regressions v2

2007-06-01 Thread Michael Buesch
On Friday 01 June 2007 14:20:44 Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Networking > > Subject: b44: regression in 2.6.22 > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/27/108 > Submitter : Maximilian Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Handled-By : Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Well, it looks like a highr

Re: [1/3] 2.6.22-rc3: known regressions v2

2007-06-01 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:43:06AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote: > On 6/2/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >I think that Sam is working on this. > > I'm a bit lost looking at those patches and don't know which ones are > the appropriate ones I should I apply? The fix is in -mm and s

Re: [1/3] 2.6.22-rc3: known regressions v2

2007-06-01 Thread Jeff Chua
On 6/2/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think that Sam is working on this. I'm a bit lost looking at those patches and don't know which ones are the appropriate ones I should I apply? Thanks, Jeff. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

Re: [1/3] 2.6.22-rc3: known regressions v2

2007-06-01 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Subject: long freezes on thinkpad t60 > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/24/100 > > Submitter : Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Handled-By : Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Status : problem is being debugged > > This i

Re: [1/3] 2.6.22-rc3: known regressions v2

2007-06-01 Thread Miklos Szeredi
> Subject: long freezes on thinkpad t60 > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/24/100 > Submitter : Miklos Szeredi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Handled-By : Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Status : problem is being debugged This isn't a regression strictly speaking, as 2.6.21 is known to b

[1/3] 2.6.22-rc3: known regressions v2

2007-06-01 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.22-rc3. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions Unclassified Subject: build failed in function `vic_sys_interrupt' References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/31/227 Submitter : Tor