Re: [1/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

2007-08-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 12:48:45AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > Here is the fix for alpha: > > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 30 14:13:57 2007 > Subject: SLUB: Force inlining for functions in slub_def.h > > Some compilers (especially older gcc releases) may skip inlining sometimes > which

Re: [1/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

2007-08-31 Thread Christoph Lameter
Here is the fix for alpha: >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 30 14:13:57 2007 Subject: SLUB: Force inlining for functions in slub_def.h Some compilers (especially older gcc releases) may skip inlining sometimes which will lead to link failures. Force the inlining of keyfunctions in slub_def.h t

Re: [1/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

2007-08-30 Thread Jan Dittmer
Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Jan Dittmer wrote: > >> Christoph Lameter wrote: >>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> Christoph, is your fix in -mm suitable for 2.6.23, or how else should this regression be fixed for 2.6.23? >>> Looks like this is just alpha an

Re: [1/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

2007-08-30 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Jan Dittmer wrote: > Christoph Lameter wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > Christoph, is your fix in -mm suitable for 2.6.23, or how else should this > > > regression be fixed for 2.6.23? > > > > Looks like this is just alpha and a certain particular

Re: [1/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

2007-08-30 Thread Jan Dittmer
Christoph Lameter wrote: On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: Christoph, is your fix in -mm suitable for 2.6.23, or how else should this regression be fixed for 2.6.23? Looks like this is just alpha and a certain particular compiler version? binutils 2.15.95, gcc 3.3.6 and I could updat

Re: [1/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

2007-08-29 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Christoph, is your fix in -mm suitable for 2.6.23, or how else should > this regression be fixed for 2.6.23? Looks like this is just alpha and a certain particular compiler version? You may get away with adding void __kmalloc_size_too_large(void) {

Re: [1/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

2007-08-29 Thread Christoph Lameter
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > CC init/version.o > > LD init/built-in.o > > LD .tmp_vmlinux1 > > arch/alpha/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0xaaa8): In function > > `pdev_save_srm_config': > > include/linux/slub_def.h:154: undefined reference to > > `__kmalloc_size_too_

Re: [1/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

2007-08-29 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 08:04:52PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote: > Michal Piotrowski wrote: > > Subject : 2.6.23-rc2 cross compile regressions (alpha,xtensa) > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/6/43 > > Last known good : alpha: 2.6.22-git8 xtensa: 2.6.22-git6 > > Submitter

Re: [1/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

2007-08-29 Thread Jeff Chua
On 8/29/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Subject : console is messed up after resume from s2ram or switching > to console from X > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/4/6 > Last known good : ? > Submitter : Jeff Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Caused-By

Re: [1/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

2007-08-29 Thread Jan Dittmer
Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Subject : 2.6.23-rc2 cross compile regressions (alpha,xtensa) > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/6/43 > Last known good : alpha: 2.6.22-git8 xtensa: 2.6.22-git6 > Submitter : Jan Dittmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Caused-By : ? > Handled-By

[1/4] 2.6.23-rc4: known regressions

2007-08-29 Thread Michal Piotrowski
Hi all, Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc4. Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc. http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions List of Aces NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007 Adrian Bunk9 Andi Kleen