On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 12:48:45AM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Here is the fix for alpha:
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 30 14:13:57 2007
> Subject: SLUB: Force inlining for functions in slub_def.h
>
> Some compilers (especially older gcc releases) may skip inlining sometimes
> which
Here is the fix for alpha:
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 30 14:13:57 2007
Subject: SLUB: Force inlining for functions in slub_def.h
Some compilers (especially older gcc releases) may skip inlining sometimes
which will lead to link failures. Force the inlining of keyfunctions in
slub_def.h t
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Jan Dittmer wrote:
>
>> Christoph Lameter wrote:
>>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>>
Christoph, is your fix in -mm suitable for 2.6.23, or how else should this
regression be fixed for 2.6.23?
>>> Looks like this is just alpha an
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > > Christoph, is your fix in -mm suitable for 2.6.23, or how else should this
> > > regression be fixed for 2.6.23?
> >
> > Looks like this is just alpha and a certain particular
Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Christoph, is your fix in -mm suitable for 2.6.23, or how else should
this regression be fixed for 2.6.23?
Looks like this is just alpha and a certain particular compiler version?
binutils 2.15.95, gcc 3.3.6 and I could updat
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Christoph, is your fix in -mm suitable for 2.6.23, or how else should
> this regression be fixed for 2.6.23?
Looks like this is just alpha and a certain particular compiler version?
You may get away with adding
void __kmalloc_size_too_large(void)
{
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > CC init/version.o
> > LD init/built-in.o
> > LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> > arch/alpha/kernel/built-in.o(.text+0xaaa8): In function
> > `pdev_save_srm_config':
> > include/linux/slub_def.h:154: undefined reference to
> > `__kmalloc_size_too_
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 08:04:52PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > Subject : 2.6.23-rc2 cross compile regressions (alpha,xtensa)
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/6/43
> > Last known good : alpha: 2.6.22-git8 xtensa: 2.6.22-git6
> > Submitter
On 8/29/07, Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject : console is messed up after resume from s2ram or switching
> to console from X
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/4/6
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Jeff Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Caused-By
Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Subject : 2.6.23-rc2 cross compile regressions (alpha,xtensa)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/6/43
> Last known good : alpha: 2.6.22-git8 xtensa: 2.6.22-git6
> Submitter : Jan Dittmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Caused-By : ?
> Handled-By
Hi all,
Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc4.
Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.
http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions
List of Aces
NameRegressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007
Adrian Bunk9
Andi Kleen
11 matches
Mail list logo