On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 16:56 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On 09/09/13 02:46 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Initially, LKML would be archived on kernel.org, but that never
> > happened and doesn't seem it will after the whole security breach
> > incident.
>
> I believe we're hoping vger will
On 09/09/13 02:46 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Initially, LKML would be archived on kernel.org, but that never
> happened and doesn't seem it will after the whole security breach
> incident.
I believe we're hoping vger will eventually start doing it on its own. :)
We do archive some of it as part
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:01:15PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:02:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > 3.2.49-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > --
> >
> > From: Hauke Mehrtens
> >
> > commit 693026ef2e751fd
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 19:39:04 +0100
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:01:15PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:02:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > 3.2.49-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me
> > > know.
> > >
> > > ---
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:02:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> 3.2.49-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> --
>
> From: Hauke Mehrtens
>
> commit 693026ef2e751fd94d2e6c71028e68343cc875d5 upstream.
>
> When b43 gets build into the kernel and
3.2.49-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Hauke Mehrtens
commit 693026ef2e751fd94d2e6c71028e68343cc875d5 upstream.
When b43 gets build into the kernel and it should use bcma we have to
ensure that bcma was also build into the kernel an
6 matches
Mail list logo