Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive (ACPI related)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/9/475
> Submitter : Mathieu Bérard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Handled-By : Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Status :
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: NCQ problem with ahci and Hitachi drive (ACPI related)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/4/178
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/9/475
Submitter : Mathieu Bérard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Handled-By : Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status : problem is
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Patch reproduced below, with an acked-by (and, uhm, a couple of spelling
>> fixes in the description -- don't hate me, 'kay?).
>
> I know that my English sucks.
Your English is fantastic, and far better than my German ever will be, so
no worries :-).
~r.
-
To
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Patch reproduced below, with an acked-by (and, uhm, a couple of spelling
fixes in the description -- don't hate me, 'kay?).
I know that my English sucks.
Your English is fantastic, and far better than my German ever will be, so
no worries :-).
~r.
-
To unsubscribe
Ray,
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 17:14 -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
> (I wondered about the IPI on a UP system, seemed a bit weird :-).)
>
> Works great, booting both with NOAPIC and without. *Much* thanks for
> debugging this while you're also handling a bunch of other issues at
> the same time.
Thank you
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 19:48 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> Subject: x86_64: ACPI regression with noapic (APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3?)
>> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/8/468
>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/22/156
>> Submitter : Ray Lee <[EMAIL
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 19:48 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Subject: x86_64: ACPI regression with noapic (APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3?)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/8/468
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/22/156
> Submitter : Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Handled-By : Thomas
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 19:48 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: x86_64: ACPI regression with noapic (APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3?)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/8/468
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/22/156
Submitter : Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 19:48 +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Subject: x86_64: ACPI regression with noapic (APICTIMER_STOPS_ON_C3?)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/8/468
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/22/156
Submitter : Ray Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email lists some known regressions in Linus' tree compared to 2.6.20.
If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you caused a breakage or I'm considering you in any other way
possibly
Ray,
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 17:14 -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
(I wondered about the IPI on a UP system, seemed a bit weird :-).)
Works great, booting both with NOAPIC and without. *Much* thanks for
debugging this while you're also handling a bunch of other issues at
the same time.
Thank you for
12 matches
Mail list logo
