On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 06:17:50PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:36:53PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > - egcs is not supported by kernel 2.6
>
> Ok.
>
> > - Am I right to assume that gcc 2.95.3 is not worse than gcc 2.95.1?
>
> No idea - I've given up tracking what comp
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 12:36:53PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> - egcs is not supported by kernel 2.6
Ok.
> - Am I right to assume that gcc 2.95.3 is not worse than gcc 2.95.1?
No idea - I've given up tracking what compilers work and don't work on
the grounds that I'm too scared to change my comp
- egcs is not supported by kernel 2.6
- Am I right to assume that gcc 2.95.3 is not worse than gcc 2.95.1?
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.13-rc6-mm2-full/Documentation/arm/README.old 2005-08-24
11:51:22.0 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13-rc6-mm2-full/Documentati
3 matches
Mail list logo