Re: [2.6 patch] IDE: remove WAIT_READY dependency on APM

2005-02-02 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
applied, sorry for the delay - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Re: [2.6 patch] IDE: remove WAIT_READY dependency on APM

2005-02-02 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
applied, sorry for the delay - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[2.6 patch] IDE: remove WAIT_READY dependency on APM

2005-01-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On the one hand APM isn't enabled on all laptops. On the other hand, this also affects regular PCs with APM support (or using a distribution kernel with APM support). The time for the !APM case was already increased from 30msec in 2.4 . Isn't there a timeout that is suitable for all cases? Alan

[2.6 patch] IDE: remove WAIT_READY dependency on APM

2005-01-31 Thread Adrian Bunk
On the one hand APM isn't enabled on all laptops. On the other hand, this also affects regular PCs with APM support (or using a distribution kernel with APM support). The time for the !APM case was already increased from 30msec in 2.4 . Isn't there a timeout that is suitable for all cases? Alan

[2.6 patch] IDE: remove WAIT_READY dependency on APM

2005-01-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On the one hand APM isn't enabled on all laptops. On the other hand, this also affects regular PCs with APM support (or using a distribution kernel with APM support). The time for the !APM case was already increased from 30msec in 2.4 . Isn't there a timeout that is suitable for all cases? Alan

[2.6 patch] IDE: remove WAIT_READY dependency on APM

2005-01-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On the one hand APM isn't enabled on all laptops. On the other hand, this also affects regular PCs with APM support (or using a distribution kernel with APM support). The time for the !APM case was already increased from 30msec in 2.4 . Isn't there a timeout that is suitable for all cases? Alan