Re: [2.6 patch] Makefile: use -fno-optimize-sibling-calls unconditionally

2007-07-17 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 06:18:47AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > We don't have to check for -fno-optimize-sibling-calls since even > gcc 3.2 supports it. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Applied, Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: [2.6 patch] Makefile: use -fno-optimize-sibling-calls unconditionally

2007-07-17 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 06:18:47AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: We don't have to check for -fno-optimize-sibling-calls since even gcc 3.2 supports it. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Applied, Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in

[2.6 patch] Makefile: use -fno-optimize-sibling-calls unconditionally

2007-07-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
We don't have to check for -fno-optimize-sibling-calls since even gcc 3.2 supports it. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- --- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/Makefile.old 2007-07-13 06:01:20.0 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/Makefile 2007-07-13 06:01:44.0 +0200 @@

[2.6 patch] Makefile: use -fno-optimize-sibling-calls unconditionally

2007-07-12 Thread Adrian Bunk
We don't have to check for -fno-optimize-sibling-calls since even gcc 3.2 supports it. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/Makefile.old 2007-07-13 06:01:20.0 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/Makefile 2007-07-13 06:01:44.0 +0200 @@